On 13/04/2008, Ben Caplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 12 April 2008 9:57 Ian Kelly wrote:
> > Doubtful. The rules do not grant a contract the power to make
> > arbitrary changes to asset holdings, whether the contract happens to
> > be the backing document for that class of assets
On Saturday 12 April 2008 9:57 Ian Kelly wrote:
> Doubtful. The rules do not grant a contract the power to make
> arbitrary changes to asset holdings, whether the contract happens to
> be the backing document for that class of assets or not. I hadn't
> noticed the Bank of Agora was claiming to do
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doubtful. The rules do not grant a contract the power to make
> arbitrary changes to asset holdings, whether the contract happens to
> be the backing document for that class of assets or not. I hadn't
> noticed the Bank o
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 4:37 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > ? Consider allowing acting on behalf for the purpose of fulfilling
> > > marker-holder's obligations?
> >
> > Good idea. Could this be automatic?
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 4:37 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ? Consider allowing acting on behalf for the purpose of fulfilling
> > marker-holder's obligations?
>
> Good idea. Could this be automatic? It is triggered manually, after
> all, and so far I seem to be getting away with it
On 12/04/2008, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're probably going to need explicit language to allow the other
> person to announce the spending on behalf of the spender.
Easy fix, I suppose:
If a person holds a set of Credits, e may by announcement redeem the
Credits, specifying a
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 6:37 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/04/2008, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> > ? Consider allowing acting on behalf for the purpose of fulfilling
> > marker-holder's obligations?
>
> Good idea. Could this be automatic? It is triggered man
On 12/04/2008, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * You probably should restrict the ownership of these currencies; at
> least of Markers. A marker-holder cannot be obliged to redeem unless
> the Marker-holder bound by the contract.
Indeed, you're right.
> * Needs an exit clause;
> {
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 5:34 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> {This is a public contract and a pledge by the name of "The Note Exchange".
>
> For each pitch of Note, the corresponding Credit is a currency, and
> the corresponding Marker is a fixed currency. Ivan Hope CXXVII is the
> record
{This is a public contract and a pledge by the name of "The Note Exchange".
For each pitch of Note, the corresponding Credit is a currency, and
the corresponding Marker is a fixed currency. Ivan Hope CXXVII is the
recordkeepor of Credits and Markers, and generally cannot create them
by announcemen
10 matches
Mail list logo
