On 7/28/24 19:53, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2024-07-28 at 16:25 -0700, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> Gratuitous:
>>>
>>> * Jaff has been Speaker since April.
>>>
>>> * On or about June 4, ais523 won (Paradox, Zen, High Score).
>>>
ais523 wrote:
On Sun, 2024-07-28 at 16:25 -0700, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
Gratuitous:
* Jaff has been Speaker since April.
* On or about June 4, ais523 won (Paradox, Zen, High Score).
* On or about June 22, Janet won (Zen).
* On or about June 27, snail won (B
On Wed, 2024-07-24 at 11:25 -0400, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
I believe I am Prime Minister.
I appoint Mischief (the sole Laureled player) to the office of
Speaker.
I appoint Mischief (the sole Laureled player) to the office of
Speaker.
I appoint Mischief (the sole Laureled player) t
On 7/24/24 00:36, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote:
> So, "an action ordinarily reserved for an office-holder as if e held the
> office"
> is duty.
Ah, sorry, I meant *list item* 1.
--
Janet Cobb
Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
Whenever the prime minister CAN [...], e SHALL do so [...].
(Hopefully I didn't misquote, but) does some part of the [...] portions
change that an obligation is created each time the conditions are
fulfilled?
IMO, there are many outstanding appointments to speaker. We've just
automatically forgive
On Tue, 2024-07-23 at 21:36 -0700, 4st nomic via agora-discussion
wrote:
> So, "an action ordinarily reserved for an office-holder as if e held
> the
> office"
> is duty.
>
> Items 1,2,3,5, by saying "the action", are actually referring to the
> duty,
> not to the action the deputy is taking? Beca
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 9:15 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 7/24/24 00:13, 4st nomic wrote:
> > Sure, but duty is not the term used in the deputisation rule.
>
>
> What I'm calling the "duty" is the requirement to perform the action
> referred to
On 7/24/24 00:13, 4st nomic wrote:
> Sure, but duty is not the term used in the deputisation rule.
What I'm calling the "duty" is the requirement to perform the action
referred to by paragraph 1 of R2160.
--
Janet Cobb
Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
Sure, but duty is not the term used in the deputisation rule.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 9:11 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 7/24/24 00:08, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote:
> > I'm confused. What do you mean?
> >
> > 2) It would be POSSIBLE for
On 7/24/24 00:08, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote:
> I'm confused. What do you mean?
>
> 2) It would be POSSIBLE for the deputy to perform the action,
> other than by deputisation, if e held the office.
> You said it was not possible to appoint snail to Speaker.
>
>5) A time
I'm confused. What do you mean?
2) It would be POSSIBLE for the deputy to perform the action,
other than by deputisation, if e held the office.
You said it was not possible to appoint snail to Speaker.
5) A time limit by which the rules require the action to be
performe
On 7/23/24 23:17, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 8:09 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 23, 2024 10:46 PM, 4st nomic via agora-business
>> wrote:
>>
>> The rules require the Prime Minister to appoint a speaker
12 matches
Mail list logo
