Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Birthdays II

2018-12-19 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 18 Dec 2018, Gaelan Steele wrote: > I feel like the first one is more of a birthday—the day you first became > a part of Agora is a lot more momentous than the last time you were> > involved in some deregistration scam (or even the last time you came back). > As for unknown birthdays,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Birthdays II

2018-12-18 Thread Gaelan Steele
I feel like the first one is more of a birthday—the day you first became a part of Agora is a lot more momentous than the last time you were involved in some deregistration scam (or even the last time you came back). As for unknown birthdays, maybe we could fall back to date of first message to

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Birthdays II

2018-12-18 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Sun, 16 Dec 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote: Using the Registrar's monthly report, my Agoran birthdays would be: 4-Feb-01, 14-Jul-03, 23-Feb-07, 27-Oct-07, 19-Jun-08, 4-May-09, 29-Oct-09, 18-Oct-11 and 25-Aug-17. You may want to use "day e most recently registered" or "day e first registered"?

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Birthdays II

2018-12-16 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sat, 15 Dec 2018, Reuben Staley wrote: > Enact a new rule entitled "Birthday Gifts", power=1, with the text: > It is considered to be a player's Agoran Birthday when on the > Agoran day e registered, if it is also a different Agoran year. > Exactly once each time it is a

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Birthdays II

2018-12-15 Thread ATMunn
I thought that might have been the case. I wasn't sure what to say, really, because I didn't want to make you look stupid, but I didn't want the proposal to fail for no good reason :P On 12/15/2018 5:02 PM, Reuben Staley wrote: ATMunn: I pasted the wrong thing and that's why it's the same.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Birthdays II

2018-12-15 Thread Aris Merchant
Or, you could just say “on each anniversary of eir registration”, which is a lot clearer, IMO. -Aris On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 1:52 PM ATMunn wrote: > I think that's the exact same as the first one? Sorry if I wasn't clear. > I wasn't making a suggestion of what it should be changed to, I was >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Birthdays II

2018-12-15 Thread ATMunn
I think that's the exact same as the first one? Sorry if I wasn't clear. I wasn't making a suggestion of what it should be changed to, I was showing the weirdness. I think just getting moving the "if" to before the "when" should work. On 12/15/2018 4:22 PM, Reuben Staley wrote: pf On

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Birthdays II

2018-12-15 Thread Reuben Staley
I retract the last one and submit this one: Title: Happy Birthday To You Author: Trigon Coauthors: ATMunn AI: 1 Enact a new rule entitled "Birthday Gifts", power=1, with the text: It is considered to be a player's Agoran Birthday when on the Agoran day e registered, if it is

DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Birthdays II

2018-12-15 Thread ATMunn
The first sentence doesn't seem to make sense grammatically. "It is considered ... when on the Agoran day e registered, if ..." On 12/15/2018 3:09 PM, Reuben Staley wrote: I am not sure if this is better, but whatever. I submit the following proposal. Title: Happy Birthday To You Author: