On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 02:03:40AM +1100, Sarah S. via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 1:48 PM Aspen via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 7:39 PM Falsifian via agora-business <
> > agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> >
> > >
On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 1:48 PM Aspen via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 7:39 PM Falsifian via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 12:44:47PM -0400, Jason Cobb via agora-business
> > wrote:
> > > I i
On Tue, 2021-10-05 at 12:44 -0400, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> I intend, with 4 support from other players who own at least 2 types
> of ribbon, to start a Rank 2 Festival.
I do not yet support, but I agree that it's worth keeping an eye on the
situation, and may well support in the nea
Elysion wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:03:20 -0800
> Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> root wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:30 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I intend, with 2 support, to make Proposals 5956 and 5962 democratic.
>>> I support. With 2 support, I mak
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Joshua Boehme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only argument I can see around that is to argue that a substantially and
> deliberately incorrect attempted resolution fails to satisfy 208(c), and thus
> the Agoran decisions on proposals 5956 and 5962 have not been
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:03:20 -0800
Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> root wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:30 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I intend, with 2 support, to make Proposals 5956 and 5962 democratic.
> >
> > I support. With 2 support, I make Proposals 5956 a
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CFJ 2117
That contradicts CFJ 2002. "Monster" and by association "Monstrous"
are either defined by the rules or not. It can't be both ways.
-root
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:23 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Really, P5719 passed at the worst possible time; I didn't even expect
>>> it to pass.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:23 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Really, P5719 passed at the worst possible time; I didn't even expect
>> it to pass. Nevertheless...
>>
>> I intend, with Monstrous Consent, to remove this fro
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:23 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Really, P5719 passed at the worst possible time; I didn't even expect
> it to pass. Nevertheless...
>
> I intend, with Monstrous Consent, to remove this from Rule 2193:
> A player MAY perform an action on behalf of The Monster
10 matches
Mail list logo
