On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> Origin IP is 64.17.129.3 or possibly 64.17.152.116. There were two
> messages within the past 15 minutes, both with the subject "BobTHJ's
> actions (automated)".
Your origin IP is smh*.opentransfer.com. Only one was received at my
end, the one
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> Origin IP is 64.17.129.3 or possibly 64.17.152.116. There were two
> messages within the past 15 minutes, both with the subject "BobTHJ's
> actions (automated)".
>
> Thanks,
> BobTHJ
I received one such message.
--
-c.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:21, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:19, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:15, Taral wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
H. Distributor: the automated e-mails from my site don't seem to be
reaching the li
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:15, Taral wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> H. Distributor: the automated e-mails from my site don't seem to be
>> reaching the list. Do you have spam filtering of some sort active that
>> may be catching them?
>
> I can look if you give me
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:19, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:15, Taral wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>>> H. Distributor: the automated e-mails from my site don't seem to be
>>> reaching the list. Do you have spam filtering of some sort active that
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> H. Distributor: the automated e-mails from my site don't seem to be
> reaching the list. Do you have spam filtering of some sort active that
> may be catching them?
I can look if you give me a timestamp and origin IP or envelope return address
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 08:50, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> I harvest 2631, 2632, 2633, 2634, 2635 (CFJ numbers) for two WRV each,
>> using X crops as needed. If I am unable to harvest all of these
>> numbers I instead harvest as many as possible.
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> I harvest 2631, 2632, 2633, 2634, 2635 (CFJ numbers) for two WRV each,
> using X crops as needed. If I am unable to harvest all of these
> numbers I instead harvest as many as possible.
Note: the Date: header on this message is earlier than th
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> I feel generous and give Tom (who has no ranches) a 3, a 4, a 5, and an 8.
I'm treating this as too ambiguous to succeed; was this intended to
transfer ranches or crops?
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 18:51 -0400, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> I offer ais523 a trade of my 4s for eir 9s
I'm happy to trade up to half of the 9s I own to you in exchange for an
equal number of 4s.
I'll give you a pledge to this effect if you want, but I'm catching up
on the Notary's report atm and
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 5:11 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You can't harvest the same CFJ twice.
>
> I don't see that in the contract.
"Within one week after an ID number is assigned to a CFJ, a Farmer CAN
o
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can't harvest the same CFJ twice.
I don't see that in the contract.
On 6/11/08, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I harvest 1990, a CFJ, for 2 WRV.
> > I mill 6 * 9 to get X.
> > I harvest 1990, a CFJ, for 2 WRV.
>
> You can't harvest the same CFJ twice.
Aw. Well, I guess I have to wai
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I harvest 1990, a CFJ, for 2 WRV.
> I mill 6 * 9 to get X.
> I harvest 1990, a CFJ, for 2 WRV.
You can't harvest the same CFJ twice.
-root
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I mill 2 '9' crops with my '*' mill to create a '1' crop.
>
> I harvest 1919.
>
> --Wooble
>
I recognize your milling action. However, your harvesting is invalid
due to the first line of section 6:
6. A Farmer CANNOT Ha
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:06 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/22/08, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Note that in the SoA report I was mistakenly mis-quoting the agreement
> > as I had forgotten to add the "for the first time" when I updated the
> > changes.
>
> That's
On 2/22/08, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Note that in the SoA report I was mistakenly mis-quoting the agreement
> as I had forgotten to add the "for the first time" when I updated the
> changes.
That's really obnoxious. And all that work because you didn't properly
update your repor
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Iammars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> They get new lands and water rights vouchers for joining up.
>
Ah, I don't think this trick worked. Here is the text of the last
change I made to the AAA agreement:
{
Amend section 3 by replacing:
{{
As soon as possible after a f
They get new lands and water rights vouchers for joining up.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2/22/08, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:27 PM, T
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/22/08, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I transfer 3 Water Rights Vouchers, 2 #4 crops, and land #7 to root.
> >
>
> > I transfer 6 Water Ri
20 matches
Mail list logo
