DIS: Re: BUS: Calling 2 CFJs

2017-07-30 Thread Alex Smith
On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 10:24 +1000, V.J Rada wrote: > I hope these are remotely meritorious. I remember some controversy about > whether the overhaul rule violated 217, I don't agree that it does but I wish > to > put it to rest. > > I call a CFJ on "The rule change purporting to enact a rule enti

DIS: Re: BUS: Calling 2 CFJs

2017-07-30 Thread Nicholas Evans
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 7:24 PM, V.J Rada wrote: > I hope these are remotely meritorious. I remember some controversy about > whether > the overhaul rule violated 217, I don't agree that it does but I wish to > put it to rest. > > I call a CFJ on "The rule change purporting to enact a rule entitl