On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
>> 2008/11/17 Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Clinching evidence:
>>
>> The player did not deregister. The registrar deregistered the player.
>
> Wasn't this the source of BobT
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
> 2008/11/17 Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Clinching evidence:
>
> The player did not deregister. The registrar deregistered the player.
Wasn't this the source of BobTHJs contract-to-deregister scam (e
contracted to deregister for a fee, had the Reg
2008/11/17 Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/11/17 Joshua Boehme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> The second instance is BobTHJ in January 2008. Digging through the archives,
>> it looks like it generated some discussion, but I don't see a CFJ on it.
>> Thus, we cannot conclusively say that BobTHJ'
2008/11/17 Joshua Boehme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The second instance is BobTHJ in January 2008. Digging through the archives,
> it looks like it generated some discussion, but I don't see a CFJ on it.
> Thus, we cannot conclusively say that BobTHJ's registration was permitted --
> it could have b
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 01:03:02 +
"Elliott Hird" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/11/17 Joshua Boehme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > The question is, does the "so" in the second sentence refer to
> > "deregister[ing]" or to "deregister[ing] by announcement?" If the latter,
> > then even deregistrati
5 matches
Mail list logo
