On 24 June 2012 23:26, FKA441344 <441...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I intend to, With Notice, initiate a criminal case: omd violated Rule
> 2143 by failing to distribute by the end of Sun. 24 June proposals in
> the proposal pool that were in there at the beginning of Mon. 18 June.
Do we really need cons
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 3:26 PM, FKA441344 <441...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I intend to, With Notice, initiate a criminal case: omd violated Rule
> 2143 by failing to distribute by the end of Sun. 24 June proposals in
> the proposal pool that were in there at the beginning of Mon. 18 June.
Oh, come on!
FKA441344 wrote:
TTttPF
-- Forwarded message --
From: FKA441344<441...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Let's get things moving
To: agora-discussion@agoranomic.org
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
On Mon, J
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Even if that wasn't so, my preface "if I haven't already" probably would
> have rendered the assignments to FKA441344 ineffective.
>
> Proto: Refactor non-self-judgement
> (AI = 2, co-author = ais523)
>
> Amend Rule 1868 (Judge Assignment Gener
ais523 wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 12:20 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
Granted on "whether the case existed", but I don't follow how it would
have existed and been assigned to someone else (especially FKA441344,
who initiated it).
You purported to assign it to FKA441344, so it rather depends on wh
ais523 wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 18:42 +0100, FKA441344 wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 5:51 PM, FKA441344<441...@gmail.com> wrote:
*scshunt violated Rule 2158 by failing to assign judgement to case 3218
ASAP after it was assigned to e
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 5:51 PM, FKA441344 <441...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> *scshunt violated Rule 2158 by failing to assign judgement to case 3218
>> ASAP after it was assigned to em.
>
> Evidence: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 5:51 PM, FKA441344 <441...@gmail.com> wrote:
> *scshunt violated Rule 2158 by failing to assign judgement to case 3218
> ASAP after it was assigned to em.
Evidence: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3218
Arguments: It wasn't me, boss!
-scshunt
8 matches
Mail list logo
