coppro wrote:
> On 10/11/2010 12:34 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>- A player CAN move an indicated player an indicated number of
>> positions P on the list in an indicated direction (up or down)
>> for a charge equal to the sum of the Influence Levels of all
>> the po
bOn 10/11/2010 12:11 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Hmm, yes. Looking at a table for both, it depends on whether you think
players should be able to move through multiple named positions in a single
week. My feeling is no; moving a single named position should take all your
savings for that week (bring
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 10/11/2010 01:44 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > > On 10/11/2010 12:34 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > > > - A player CAN move an indicated player an indicated number of
> > > > positions P on the li
On 10/11/2010 05:09 AM, ais523 wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 01:20 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
Oh, also, CFJ: {Posting an intent to perform a dependent action is
itself an action.}
This is relevant because of "I intend, with support, to intend, without
objection, to...", presumably?
And, in the
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 01:20 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Oh, also, CFJ: {Posting an intent to perform a dependent action is
> itself an action.}
This is relevant because of "I intend, with support, to intend, without
objection, to...", presumably?
--
ais523
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, com...@gmail.com wrote:
> >Upon an Appeals Judgement overturning a judgement for
> >containing an inappropriate judicial declaration, the
> >Appeals Panel SHALL publish a judicial declaration nullifying
> >the effects of the initial judicial declaration. Su
On 10/11/2010 01:44 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
On 10/11/2010 12:34 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
- A player CAN move an indicated player an indicated number of
positions P on the list in an indicated direction (up or down)
for a charge eq
On 10/11/2010 01:44 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Need to fix something here or the list isn't stable... Less intrusive patch
idea?
-G.
To fix the immediate problem, just say "If a judicial finding indicates
that the list's order is ambiguous, then the judge SHALL issue a
judicial declaration" etc
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On 10/11/2010 12:34 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >- A player CAN move an indicated player an indicated number of
> > positions P on the list in an indicated direction (up or down)
> > for a charge equal to the sum of the Influence Leve
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 11, 2010, at 12:34 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>- A player CAN move an indicated player an indicated number of
> positions P on the list in an indicated direction (up or down)
> for a charge equal to the sum of the Influence Levels of all
> the positi
On 10/11/2010 12:34 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
- A player CAN move an indicated player an indicated number of
positions P on the list in an indicated direction (up or down)
for a charge equal to the sum of the Influence Levels of all
the positions between the indicat
11 matches
Mail list logo
