On 20 October 2011 12:49, Geoffrey Spear woo...@nomictools.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
I nominate Arkady English for Promotor.
I nominate myself as Promotor.
--
Wooble
I accept my nomination. (Do we have to do that? I can't remember,
On 20 October 2011 13:09, Arkady English arkadyenglish+ag...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 October 2011 12:49, Geoffrey Spear woo...@nomictools.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
I nominate Arkady English for Promotor.
I nominate myself as Promotor.
On 20 October 2011 13:20, Arkady English arkadyenglish+ag...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 October 2011 13:09, Arkady English arkadyenglish+ag...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 20 October 2011 12:49, Geoffrey Spear woo...@nomictools.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com
Arkady English wrote:
I accept my nomination.
NttPF
(Do we have to do that? I can't remember, and
don't want to go looking through the rules at work.)
Yes, unless you nominated yourself. Rule 2154 (Election Procedure),
relevant excerpt:
1) The valid options are the active players
Arkady English wrote:
Ah, right, IADoP initiated the election, though I don't think I ever
actually went inactive between nomination and election. (The census
doesn't seem to think so...)
Sat 6 Aug 10:36:50 Walker declines Promotor and Rulekeepor; nominates
ais523,
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Warrigalihope12...@gmail.com wrote:
I nominate myself for Conductor, and promise to publish a monthly
Agoran budget so you can see where your money's going.
I nominate myself for
On 16 Dec 2008, at 14:48, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
Other than this claim that the office of Rulekeepor
constitutes a permanent dictatorship, I think comex is doing a fine
job.
I never said permanent; I was under the assumption that the appeals
processes were still going and it could summarily be
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
I never said permanent; I was under the assumption that the appeals
processes were still going and it could summarily be finished off
with a win and then repealed after them.
What ehird said. We've just been
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
I nominate myself as Rulekeepor.
Sorry I'm behind; I'm very busy IRL.
On Oct 21, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 14:01 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Benjamin Schultz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What the
hey, I also nominate B Nomic for Conductor.
Fails. At least, I *hope* I didn't miss B Nomic becoming
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Benjamin Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What the
hey, I also nominate B Nomic for Conductor.
Fails. At least, I *hope* I didn't miss B Nomic becoming a player.
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 14:01 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Benjamin Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What the
hey, I also nominate B Nomic for Conductor.
Fails. At least, I *hope* I didn't miss B Nomic becoming a player.
Nope, it hasn't registered yet.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, it hasn't registered yet. Also, it isn't a public contract yet
because the B Nomic rules haven't been posted to the Agoran PF, and also
I'm not sure if the proposal to add the Agoran public contract
partnership
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Benjamin Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I nominate the Monster, Bayes, the AFO, and the PBA for Conductor. What the
hey, I also nominate B Nomic for Conductor.
I am willing to have Bayes take on the responsibilities of the office,
with the caveat that note
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 16:01 -0400, comex wrote:
(The reason I'm responding to one of these mass nominations seriously
is that the idea of having Bayes as the recordkeepor for something
intrigues me. It'd be a novelty having such a fast recordkeepor, and
would certainly make scams like the
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:01 PM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, if you want someone more capable in the office, don't vote for
Bayes. You could vote for me, although I wouldn't be nearly as fast.
Although if root starts publishing a web report updated more
frequently than the email
comex wrote:
Although if root starts publishing a web report updated more
frequently than the email version, I for one will vote for em.
Incidentally, I haven't updated my old Conductor database since
around the time root took over, so please don't rely on it. I'll
take it offline once root's
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 14:12, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, I'm also intending to (eventually) track credits and
markers. H. Accountor, what would be your preference here? I could:
* set you up to enter the data and publish the generated reports;
* enter the data myself
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:01 PM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, if you want someone more capable in the office, don't vote for
Bayes. You could vote for me, although I wouldn't be nearly as fast.
Although if root
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 11:36 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I nominate root, Murphy, and Wooble as Registrar.
I nominate myself as Registrar.
--
ais523
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 9:39 AM, ehird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7 Oct 2008, at 16:36, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I nominate root, Murphy, and Wooble as Registrar.
--Wooble
Would you prefer a game where there were no interesting scams at all?
Burying hidden actions in large amounts of text is
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 09:42 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
Burying hidden actions in large amounts of text is the oldest scam in
the book. It's not interesting at all.
Well, in this case I'm trying to test the forum rules, and in particular
R101. After all, as far as I can tell R101 implies that
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 09:06 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
Right != actuality. In particular, R478's should ensure e can receive
is pointless otherwise.
Agreed. I'm not sure if the ruleset handles this sort of thing well at
all, which is the main point of the exercise.
I'm confused.
--
ais523
ais523 wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 09:42 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
Burying hidden actions in large amounts of text is the oldest scam in
the book. It's not interesting at all.
Well, in this case I'm trying to test the forum rules, and in particular
R101. After all, as far as I can tell R101
On 29 Sep 2008, at 13:32, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I nominate Wooble as Mad Scientist.
Yer just in it for the deputization...
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yer just in it for the deputization...
No, I'm just opposed to officers blatantly abusing their powers.
On 29 Sep 2008, at 14:18, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
No, I'm just opposed to officers blatantly abusing their powers.
The power is a blatant abuse in the first place.
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 09:18 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Elliott Hird
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yer just in it for the deputization...
No, I'm just opposed to officers blatantly abusing their powers.
You don't want to see what me blatantly abusing Mad
2008/5/15 Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There having been no other nominations during the nomination period
for this office, I hereby install ais512 as Mad Scientist.
-IADoP Wooble
What/who is ais512?
ehird
29 matches
Mail list logo
