Ed Murphy wrote:
> An action is regulated if any of the following is true:
What is the effect of an action being regulated?
-zefram
On 8/18/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (a) The action CANNOT be performed, or CAN be performed
> ONLY IF certain conditions are satisfied.
>
> (b) The action MAY NOT be performed, or MAY be performed
> ONLY IF certain conditions are satisfied.
On 8/20/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/18/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (a) The action CANNOT be performed, or CAN be performed
> > ONLY IF certain conditions are satisfied.
> >
> > (b) The action MAY NOT be performed, or MAY be performed
>
On 9/20/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (c) The action would, as part of its effect, modify information
> that some player is REQUIRED to record. Any such action
> CANNOT be performed except as allowed by the rules.
I'm not entirely convinced that the
Zefram wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
An action is regulated if any of the following is true:
What is the effect of an action being regulated?
The new Rule 2125 would specify the effect, depending on how
it is regulated. Furthermore, Rule 101 (ii) fails to grant
players the right to perform
On 9/22/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Moreover, when such a change would be caused by
> proposal, it is presumably the action of resolving the decision to
> accept the proposal that would be impossible. But in that scenario we
> would have a dead proposal in limbo without any ability
Proposal: Refactor regulation
(AI = 3, please)
Amend Rule 2125 (Regulation Regulations) to read:
An action is regulated if any of the following is true:
(a) The rules specify that the action CANNOT be performed, or
CAN be performed ONLY IF certain conditions are satis
7 matches
Mail list logo
