I'm happy with the intent of this proposal, but I'm not convinced that
The voting limit of an eligible voter is reduced by one if e is
not a natural person.
is actually going to work. It's at least unclear. When is the voting
limit reduced? The most natural interpretation seems to
On 5/4/07, Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm happy with the intent of this proposal, but I'm not convinced that
The voting limit of an eligible voter is reduced by one if e is
not a natural person.
is actually going to work. It's at least unclear. When is the voting
limit
Taral wrote:
Any suggestions on wording?
I think your explanation was much clearer:
at any point, the voting limit is one less than it
would be if the voter was not a natural person.
We've used such forms of wording in the rules before. Adjusting slightly,
I suggest the
On 5/4/07, Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I struggled with making it sufficiently generic and yet clear. The
intent is that at any point, the voting limit is one less than it
would be if the voter was not a natural person.
I have a better idea: restrict playerhood to actual persons.
--
C.
Maud wrote:
On 5/4/07, Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I struggled with making it sufficiently generic and yet clear. The
intent is that at any point, the voting limit is one less than it
would be if the voter was not a natural person.
I have a better idea: restrict playerhood to actual
On 5/4/07, Michael Slone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a better idea: restrict playerhood to actual persons.
How boring.
--
Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can't prove anything.
-- Gödel's Incompetence Theorem
Taral wrote:
On 5/4/07, Michael Slone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a better idea: restrict playerhood to actual persons.
How boring.
I agree. We've previously had Groups that could vote, own currencies, and
suchlike; I see no reason not to explore the possibilities of group-like
entities
Taral wrote:
I submit the following proposal:
Proposal: No free votes
Adoption Index: 3
Change rule 1950 (Voting Limits) to read:
The voting limit of an eligible voter on a democratic proposal
is one and cannot be changed except by this rule.
The voting limit of an eligible
On 5/3/07, quazie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So non-natural players may not vote on democratic proposals?
Exactly.
--
Taral [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can't prove anything.
-- Gödel's Incompetence Theorem
9 matches
Mail list logo
