DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: new forum

2010-12-31 Thread Sean Hunt
On 10-12-31 01:38 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: {{ Flip the Publicity of the mailing list with the address agora-pub...@googlegroups.com (on the web at http://groups.google.com/group/agora-public) to Public. }} AGAINST. I hate Google Groups. -scshunt

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: new forum

2010-12-31 Thread Elliott Hird
On 31 December 2010 06:38, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > {{ > Flip the Publicity of the mailing list with the address > agora-pub...@googlegroups.com (on the web at > http://groups.google.com/group/agora-public) to Public. > }} Do you have moderation powers on this forum? If so, AGAINST*infinity. If no

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: new forum

2010-12-31 Thread comexk
Sent from my iPhone On Dec 31, 2010, at 2:45 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 5:37 AM, wrote: >> The ability to submit 10,000 CFJs is not guaranteed by R101; > > Well, that's the interpretation of several players. Too bad "no > interpretation of Agoran law" is valid when

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: new forum

2010-12-31 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 5:37 AM, wrote: > The ability to submit 10,000 CFJs is not guaranteed by R101; Well, that's the interpretation of several players. Too bad "no interpretation of Agoran law" is valid when it contradicts R101, assertions to the contrary notwithstanding.

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: new forum

2010-12-31 Thread comexk
The ability to submit 10,000 CFJs is not guaranteed by R101; neither should be the ability to take hundreds of actions in a single message. For reports, you could just ask... Sent from my iPhone On Dec 31, 2010, at 7:38 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > WHEREAS, the Distributor's moderation policy

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: new forum

2010-12-31 Thread Taral
I'd like to point out that the message size limit has been raised in the past and can be raised again, if people are generally for it. There's no need to create another forum. On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > WHEREAS, the Distributor's moderation policy violates the R101