Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: precedence scam?

2019-12-29 Thread Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion
Both of my drafts used the same definition. Cobb’s version did switch to another one. Gaelan > On Dec 29, 2019, at 4:48 PM, omd via agora-discussion > wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 5:17 PM Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion > wrote: >> So, starting with a trivial case, I think it’s pret

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: precedence scam?

2019-12-29 Thread omd via agora-discussion
On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 5:17 PM Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote: > So, starting with a trivial case, I think it’s pretty clear that a player > registering does not constitute a “change in the ruleset,” even though it > affects the functioning of rules with regard to that person. My goal

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: precedence scam?

2019-12-29 Thread Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion
So, starting with a trivial case, I think it’s pretty clear that a player registering does not constitute a “change in the ruleset,” even though it affects the functioning of rules with regard to that person. My goal was word the rule such that it under the same case. However, an argument could

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: precedence scam?

2019-12-29 Thread Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
On 12/29/2019 1:51 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote: On 12/29/19 4:39 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote: That's the exact reason is why R1030 is written that way - R1030 prevents the rule from "getting into the ruleset" in the first place.  When you say "precedence over all r

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: precedence scam?

2019-12-29 Thread Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
On 12/29/19 4:39 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote: That's the exact reason is why R1030 is written that way - R1030 prevents the rule from "getting into the ruleset" in the first place. When you say "precedence over all rules" it's a straightforward precedence claim of the sort that's

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: precedence scam?

2019-12-29 Thread Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
On 12/29/2019 1:15 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote: On Dec 29, 2019, at 1:35 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote: On 12/29/2019 11:31 AM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote: Create a power-0.1 rule titled "Nothing to see here, Rule 1030,” with the following text: { T

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: precedence scam?

2019-12-29 Thread Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion
The paragraph I’m attempting to exploit is this one (quoted from 1030/13): { No change to the ruleset can occur that would cause a Rule to directly claim precedence over this Rule as a means of determining precedence. This applies to changes by the enactment or amendment of

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: precedence scam?

2019-12-29 Thread Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
On 12/29/2019 11:31 AM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote: Create a power-0.1 rule titled "Nothing to see here, Rule 1030,” with the following text: { This rule takes precedence over all rules, including That One Rule, the provisions of That One Rule notwithstanding. That One Rule is de