Ed Murphy wrote:
>Zefram wrote:
>>This version still doesn't make it actually work.
>
>Why not?
Unspecified constitutional status of the judgement. Not clear on the
set of parties. Also, the exception to the eligibility rule is ugly.
This is a symptom of the general issue that you have a bad fit
Zefram wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
When a judicial question is applicable and open, and its case
has a judge assigned to it, the judge CAN assign an appropriate
judgement to it by announcement,
Making it impossible to assign an inappropriate judgement is a very
bad idea. The two
Ed Murphy wrote:
> A judicial question is a question that arises within a judicial
> case.
Need to specify that judicial questions arise only as defined by the rules.
> When a judicial question is applicable and open, and its case
> has a judge assigned to it, the judge CAN as
3 matches
Mail list logo
