On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 11:54 AM nix via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 5/24/23 13:52, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Oh. Well. That's just what the Arbitor said:
> > "I hereby initiate an Agoran Decision (a Moot) to determine public
> > confidence
On 5/24/23 13:52, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
Oh. Well. That's just what the Arbitor said:
"I hereby initiate an Agoran Decision (a Moot) to determine public
confidence in CFJ 4030's current judgement of TRUE, "
I am publicly confident in Yachay's judgement of TRUE.
So if you're
nix: "How is it on the way out if it's being reinforced by a decision? "
Janet: "I strongly disagree with "we are voting on the final outcome". The
reasoning is what matters for building consensus, and the reasoning is
what matters for future cases."
Oh. Well. That's just what the Arbitor said:
"I
On 5/24/23 14:28, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
> I vote AFFIRM on this decision. The reasoning may be "wrong", but we are
> voting on the final outcome which is perfectly acceptable. That and just
> because a reasoning is hasty or simple doesn't determine that the reasoning
> is wrong.
On 5/24/23 13:28, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
I vote AFFIRM on this decision. The reasoning may be "wrong", but we are
voting on the final outcome which is perfectly acceptable. That and just
because a reasoning is hasty or simple doesn't determine that the reasoning
is wrong. Finall
5 matches
Mail list logo
