On Sat, 24 Nov 2018, Reuben Staley wrote:
In the most recent ruleset, I only replaced the "earn", not the "earns".
Someone can CoE it, but in a couple of weeks, Aris' proposal will pass and
converge the gamestate.
My options (1) and (4) would converge with this proposal, but the rest
wouldn
In the most recent ruleset, I only replaced the "earn", not the "earns".
Someone can CoE it, but in a couple of weeks, Aris' proposal will pass
and converge the gamestate.
On 11/24/18 11:05 AM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
Sorry, my mind isn’t getting the s
On Fri, 23 Nov 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
Sorry, my mind isn’t getting the semantics of your comment. Could you break
down what you mean?
The original rule text contains both the words "earn" and "earns", and the
latter may be considered a form of the former (the lemma form).
Then the quest
Sorry, my mind isn’t getting the semantics of your comment. Could you break
down what you mean?
-Aris
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 11:40 PM Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> I'm wondering what happens to the word "earns" throughout these changes.
> Did it get replaced by the original provision, and if so, doe
I'm wondering what happens to the word "earns" throughout these changes.
Did it get replaced by the original provision, and if so, does it get
uncorrected back correctly?
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Fri, 23 Nov 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
Wait, you want the literal opposite of this right? You want t
I award myself a Red Ribbon for Proposal 8129.
Ugh, I want to write some proposals. It's so hard to come up with ideas
though, but I guess I shouldn't force it.
6 matches
Mail list logo
