On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 16:21 -0500, comex wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
> wrote:
> > NUM II AI SUBMITTER CHAMBER TITLE
> > 6583 1 4.0 c.GreenCrumbling Fountain
> > 6584 0 2.0 c.GreenProposal
> > 6585 0 3.0
G. wrote:
>> 6588 1 3.0 c.GreenR101 changes
> AGAlNST
>> 6589 0 3.0 c.GreenClarify R101 deregistration
> AGAlNST
Cute.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 2:54 PM, comex wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 4:29 PM, ais523 wrote:
>>> Cool, a c.-only distribution. I vote FOR each proposal x my voting limit.
>>
>> I'm really annoyed at your attempt to repeal Ribbons (as part of 6586;
>> mostly, I'm not annoyed) when I'm so close
2009/11/23 ais523 :
> I'm really annoyed at your attempt to repeal Ribbons (as part of 6586;
> mostly, I'm not annoyed) when I'm so close to a second win by
> Renaissance.
Funnily enough, the game is not run according to letting you get the
ever-present next win you're always "so close to getting"
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, ais523 wrote:
> I'm really annoyed at your attempt to repeal Ribbons (as part of 6586;
> mostly, I'm not annoyed) when I'm so close to a second win by
> Renaissance...
This is a nomic. We went out of our way to make voting manipulation cards.
Make the win worthwhile: Kill a
coppro wrote:
> But what about Murphy and myself? We are both very close to a victory;
> Murphy in particular needs only bribe a newbie to win.
I believe the list of eligible "newbies" is a subset of ais523, c.,
coppro, Edmond Dantes, JonnyRotten, Ienpw III, Sgeo, Taral, Tiger,
woggle, Yally. co
Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
But what about Murphy and myself? We are both very close to a victory;
Murphy in particular needs only bribe a newbie to win.
I believe the list of eligible "newbies" is a subset of ais523, c.,
coppro, Edmond Dantes, JonnyRotten, Ienpw III, Sgeo, Taral, Tiger,
w
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
> coppro wrote:
>
>> But what about Murphy and myself? We are both very close to a victory;
>> Murphy in particular needs only bribe a newbie to win.
>
> I believe the list of eligible "newbies" is a subset of ais523, c.,
> coppro, Edmond Dantes, JonnyRotten,
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> ? If Taral's eligible, wouldn't you and I be too Murphy ? -G.
Taral's not eligible (was previously a player from 3 Apr 00 to 13 Dec
06). Not that I'm likely to have a No Confidence card fast enough to
fulfill my pledge to try to become Regis
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> ? If Taral's eligible, wouldn't you and I be too Murphy ? -G.
>
> Taral's not eligible (was previously a player from 3 Apr 00 to 13 Dec
> 06). Not that I'm likely to have a No Confidence card fas
I think "has been a player continuously for X" is supposed to mean "is
a player, and has been so continuously for X". e.g. if I deregister,
I wouldn't say "I've been a player of Agora for three months."
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 24, 2009, at 11:19 AM, Kerim Aydin
wrote:
On Tue, 24 N
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, comex wrote:
> I think "has been a player continuously for X" is supposed to mean "is a
> player, and has been so continuously for X". e.g. if I deregister, I
> wouldn't
> say "I've been a player of Agora for three months."
Heh, is c. arguing for what it's "supposed to me
G. wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> coppro wrote:
>>
>>> But what about Murphy and myself? We are both very close to a victory;
>>> Murphy in particular needs only bribe a newbie to win.
>> I believe the list of eligible "newbies" is a subset of ais523, c.,
>> coppro, Edmond Dante
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> The Registrar's report doesn't show Taral having deregistered
> (though I thought e had at some point). I deregistered to test
> non-player participation via the AFO, but if you're eligible via
> your recent CFJ (I doubt it, the intended reading
Wooble wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> The Registrar's report doesn't show Taral having deregistered
>> (though I thought e had at some point). I deregistered to test
>> non-player participation via the AFO, but if you're eligible via
>> your recent CFJ (I doubt it,
15 matches
Mail list logo
