coppro wrote:
> On 08/21/2010 02:32 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> 6808 P 1 1.0 coppro Super Robot Powers
>> AGAINST (I smell a scam consisting of an affordably short sub-message
>> within a 1000+ word container message)
>
> I sure hope not; that's why I built the Robot rule and the recent
On 08/21/2010 02:32 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
6808 P 1 1.0 coppro Super Robot Powers
AGAINST (I smell a scam consisting of an affordably short sub-message
within a 1000+ word container message)
I sure hope not; that's why I built the Robot rule and the recent
proposed amendment of sen
Sgeo wrote:
>> 6806 P 1 3.1 coppro Ratification misstep
> PRESENT [What's this for?]
IIRC, ratifying the ruleset is currently rendered ineffective by
Rule 105's "Rule changes always occur sequentially".
Keba wrote:
> Sean Hunt wrote:
>>
>>> 6805 G 1 1.0 KebaProps should be important!
>> This decision doesn't exist, but ENDORSE the Captain just in case
>
> Why does this decision not exist? ais523 had payed a fee to make it
> distributable?
IIRC, the initial distribution was inef
On 08/17/2010 09:58 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
6800 P 1 1.5 coppro Distribution
Endorse Taral
While I support this vote generally, Taral is not an eligible voter and
so the vote will be PRESENT.
-coppro
On 08/17/2010 02:24 PM, ais523 wrote:
6794 P 0 1.0 coppro Restore White
Conditional: AGAINST if proposal 6794 passes/would pass, FOR otherwise
Uh...
If you meant 6795, it should be totally ineffective if 6795 does pass,
as White Ribbons won't be defined and will cease to exist/f
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 13:10 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > I change my chamber to Purple.
>
> I assume this is close enough to changing eir Title that it's effective?
We've been through this before. (Did nobody read the disputed section of
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> > I assume this is close enough to changing eir Title that it's effective?
>
> Err, nevermind.
I know, I had to look too, that's an awkwardly-written rule.
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I assume this is close enough to changing eir Title that it's effective?
Err, nevermind.
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I change my chamber to Purple.
I assume this is close enough to changing eir Title that it's effective?
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Keba wrote:
> Sean Hunt wrote:
>>
>> > 6805 G 1 1.0 Keba Props should be important!
>> This decision doesn't exist, but ENDORSE the Captain just in case
>
> Why does this decision not exist? ais523 had payed a fee to make it
> distributable?
For som
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Keba wrote:
> Proposal 6796 should
> not be in this batch, as coppro has withdrawn it.
This proposal was re-submitted in the exact form in which it was
distributed; the distribution was successful but ILLEGAL.
12 matches
Mail list logo
