On 7/12/2020 1:13 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
> I vote as follows:
>
>> ID Author(s)AITitle
>> ---
>> 8473p Jason, G.1.0 Plain Old Bribery
> FOR. Consider this a p
On July 12, 2020 11:24:19 p.m. EDT, "N. S. via agora-business"
wrote:
>I vote like this and have tcbapo vote the same, except where indicated
Tcbapo is no longer registered. E stopped being your zombie when you were
exiled.
Falsifian
On 7/12/2020 11:24 PM, N. S. via agora-business wrote:
8476e^ ATMunn, [1] 1.0 Contract charities
AGAINST
R. Lee, I would kindly ask you to withdraw this vote. If you do so, I
can get an orange ribbon for this proposal and get a transparent ribbon.
I will gladly pay you in coin
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 1:28 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On 7/12/2020 1:13 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote:
> > I vote as follows:
> >
> >> ID Author(s)AITitle
> >>
> -
On Sun, 2020-07-12 at 13:32 -0700, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
wrote:
> That presumes that I think bribery proposals are legitimate. I don't,
> but if the rules explicitly make it so there's no legitimate way to
> do something one is clearly intended to do, I suppose that makes it
> legitima
On 7/12/2020 2:10 PM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-07-12 at 13:32 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
>> That presumes that I think bribery proposals are legitimate. I don't,
>> but if the rules explicitly make it so there's no legitimate way to
>> do something one is clearly intende
For the most part, this has turned into "when there's enough player
turnover that a majority don't have black ribbons, pass an AI-1 proposal".
So most defense for such proposals has been token at best (e.g. in the
current rules I doubt anyone thinks it's worth spending Extra Votes to
stop it).
On 7/12/2020 7:40 PM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
>> For the most part, this has turned into "when there's enough player
>> turnover that a majority don't have black ribbons, pass an AI-1 proposal".
>> So most defense for such proposals has been token at best (e.g. in the
>> current r
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, July 12, 2020 10:09 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> Scam, dunno details, nch is listed as conspirator, it involved Rule 2492?
> 2017-06-28 Quazie +K
Scam where I as Assessor manipulated the assessment order in order to give
ais523 and
On 7/12/2020 9:02 PM, Nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Sunday, July 12, 2020 10:09 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>>
>> Scam, dunno details, nch is listed as conspirator, it involved Rule 2492?
>> 2017-06-28 Quazie +K
>
> Scam where I as As
On Sun, 2020-07-12 at 21:23 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Here are the votes withdrawals, 2 seconds before the voting period
> ended:
Did I really cut it that close? My usual aim for "before the thing
happens" timing scams is at least 2 minutes, to allow for potential
email dela
On 7/12/2020 10:13 PM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-07-12 at 21:23 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> Here are the votes withdrawals, 2 seconds before the voting period
>> ended:
>
> Did I really cut it that close? My usual aim for "before the thing
> happen
On 7/17/2020 12:34 PM, ATMunn via agora-discussion wrote:
On 7/12/2020 11:24 PM, N. S. via agora-business wrote:
8476e^ ATMunn, [1] 1.0 Contract charities
AGAINST
R. Lee, I would kindly ask you to withdraw this vote. If you do so, I
can get an orange ribbon for this proposal a
On Sunday, July 12, 2020 11:23:34 PM CDT Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
> [Did I get this remotely right? I can't tell what the role your
> assessment order played in this.]
If I remember correctly, at the time assessment order directly determined
quorum and it would've failed quorum w
14 matches
Mail list logo
