On 2021-08-16 07:43, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
I recuse myself from this CFJ, but request that the new judge address
how the absence of "clearly" in Rule 2350 (Proposals) affects this
case. (Obviously it would be a good thing to fix legislatively.)
Please note that Rule 2492 "Recu
On 8/15/2021 2:43 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
> Aspen wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Aug 8, 2021 at 4:59 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-business
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/8/2021 3:33 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
The rules actually say "clearly specify" at one other point (Ru
G. wrote:
On 8/8/2021 3:33 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
The rules actually say "clearly specify" at one other point (Rule 107,
Initiating Agoran Decisions). In this case, while "exactly which part of
this message constitutes the text of the intended proposal" is somewhat
unclear,
10 aug. 2021 02:11:13 Ned Strange via agora-discussion
:
You can't reply to d. Wet by discussion because e won't see it, e
intentionally chooses not to subscribe to the discussion list.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021, 8:56 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
You can't reply to d. Wet by discussion because e won't see it, e
intentionally chooses not to subscribe to the discussion list.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021, 8:56 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On 8/9/2021 3:13 PM, D. Wet via agora-business wrote:
> > I
On 8/9/2021 3:13 PM, D. Wet via agora-business wrote:
> I will wait for the final judgement of CFJ 3922 or August 16th, which
> ever comes first, before taking the next action.
As an alternative if you want, you can sent a public message now, that
says something like "I withdraw any proposal I
6 matches
Mail list logo
