On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 23:28 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > 5725 D 1 2.0 Murphy Namespace conflicts (players)
> invalid as previously noted
I've corrected this with the PNP. I believe it will assign the corrected
proposal the number 5741, although this could change as it doesn't
assign ID
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> root wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> root wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 5719 O 1 1.0 comex Raaa
comex wrote:
> But I am curious why Murphy's judgement of CFJ 1650 claims that the
> Speaker is the vote collector of proposals when memory, RCS, and email
> all agree that it was the Assessor.
Assessor was rolled into Speaker for a while, presumably including the
time I judged that CFJ.
root wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> root wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 5719 O 1 1.0 comex Raargh!
endorse Bayes x 3
>>> Unfortunately, Bayes wasn't eligible t
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> root wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
5719 O 1 1.0 comex Raargh!
>>> endorse Bayes x 3
>>
>> Unfortunately, Bayes wasn't eligible to vote on that pro
Sir Toby wrote:
> The quoted notice is invalid because it lacks information required by
> Rule 107. Specifically, the following information was not provided:
>
> (c) A clear indication of the options available.
IMO calling it a proposal batch is a reasonably clear indication
that the option
root wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 5719 O 1 1.0 comex Raargh!
>> endorse Bayes x 3
>
> Unfortunately, Bayes wasn't eligible to vote on that proposal. I
> instead vote (endorse ais523) x 3.
Ineffective, need to retract
Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Jeff Weston (Sir Toby)
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The quoted notice is invalid because it lacks information required by
>> Rule 107. Specifically, the following information was not provided:
>>
>> (c) A clear indication of the options avai
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 8:52 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Jeff Weston (Sir Toby)
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The quoted notice is invalid because it lacks information required by
>> Rule 107. Specifically, the following information was not provided:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Jeff Weston (Sir Toby)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The quoted notice is invalid because it lacks information required by
> Rule 107. Specifically, the following information was not provided:
>
> (c) A clear indication of the options available.
CFJ 1800 (and ind
ais523 wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 23:44 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> The PerlNomic Partnership wrote:
>>
>>> 5725 D 1 2.0 Murphy Namespace conflicts (players)
>> This was INVALID by R107(e) (and I have been discarding votes on it
>> accordingly). In case the PNP has technical diffi
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 08:40 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, ais523 wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 00:02 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> >> Goethe wrote:
> >>
> 5708 O 1 1.0 comex
> >>> 4xAGAINST. Sell Ticket 2VP vote as specified.
> >>
> >> Your caste is only 2.
>
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, ais523 wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 00:02 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Goethe wrote:
>>
5708 O 1 1.0 comex
>>> 4xAGAINST. Sell Ticket 2VP vote as specified.
>>
>> Your caste is only 2.
>
> Ooh, sneaky. It's still a good deal for me anyway, though, I think.
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 19:49 -0400, comex wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 4:51 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I fill this ticket, specifying AGAINST.
> > Hmm... would you bribe me to vote on 5709 too?
> > I retract my votes on 5709 and vote SELL (2VP - Endorse Murphy) on 5709.
>
> Sorr
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 00:02 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Goethe wrote:
>
> >> 5708 O 1 1.0 comex
> > 4xAGAINST. Sell Ticket 2VP vote as specified.
>
> Your caste is only 2.
Ooh, sneaky. It's still a good deal for me anyway, though, I think.
--
ais523
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 23:44 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> The PerlNomic Partnership wrote:
>
> > 5725 D 1 2.0 Murphy Namespace conflicts (players)
>
> This was INVALID by R107(e) (and I have been discarding votes on it
> accordingly). In case the PNP has technical difficulty redistribut
Goethe wrote:
>> 5708 O 1 1.0 comex
> 4xAGAINST. Sell Ticket 2VP vote as specified.
Your caste is only 2.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 4:51 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I fill this ticket, specifying AGAINST.
> Hmm... would you bribe me to vote on 5709 too?
> I retract my votes on 5709 and vote SELL (2VP - Endorse Murphy) on 5709.
Sorry, no can do. The 25 VP I have left are all going toward Pa
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, comex wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 5709 D 1 2.0 Murphy Form 2126-EZ
>> AGAINST. Sell Ticket 2VP vote as specified.
>
> I fill this ticket, specifying AGAINST.
I hereby...er, right.
Pavitra wrote:
>> 5711 O 1 1.7 Murphy Community service
> endorse Murphy. It's not clear whether "as soon as possible" here
> means ASAP after the judgment is assigned, or ASAP after it goes into
> effect.
Those happen simultaneously. For judgements with tariffs (CHOKEY and
EXILE)
On Sunday 28 September 2008 08:40:45 am ihope wrote:
> Rule 36 states that Rule 4E83 is a synonym for Rule 83. Since we
> don't have a Rule 83, we're still safe.
I'm pretty sure Rule 36 states that It Could Always Be Worse.
http://encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php/Rules_Of_The_Internet
(Not Safe
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 1:27 AM, Ben Caplan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 27 September 2008 06:20:41 pm comex wrote:
>> We have no Rule
>> 400
>>0, so I think we're safe.
>
> Interesting. I read "4E83" to mea
On Saturday 27 September 2008 06:20:41 pm comex wrote:
> We have no Rule
> 400
>0, so I think we're safe.
Interesting. I read "4E83" to mean 0x4E83, which would be R20099. So
we're safe either way.
Pavitra
NttPF
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Dvorak Herring
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I vote:
>>
>> NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
>> 5708 O 1 1.0 comex
>
> AGAINST
>>
>> 5709 D 1 2.0 Murphy Form 2126-EZ
>
> AGAINST
>>
>> 5710 D 3 3.0 Murphy Pragmatic
I vote:
> NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
> 5708 O 1 1.0 comex
AGAINST
> 5709 D 1 2.0 Murphy Form 2126-EZ
AGAINST
> 5710 D 3 3.0 Murphy Pragmatic rights and privileges
AGAINST
> 5711 O 1 1.7 Murphy Community service
AGAINST
> 571
25 matches
Mail list logo
