Ben Caplan wrote:
> On Friday 4 July 2008 10:04:22 Ian Kelly wrote:
>> It may be that Pavitra did indeed compose the message last Sunday, but
>> it didn't get sent until today for some reason.
> I just got my laptop hooked back up to the internet this evening. There
> were about four messages sitt
On Friday 4 July 2008 10:04:22 Ian Kelly wrote:
> It may be that Pavitra did indeed compose the message last Sunday, but
> it didn't get sent until today for some reason.
I just got my laptop hooked back up to the internet this evening. There
were about four messages sitting in my outbox that just
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> root wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Ben Caplan
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> FORx4. I also retract my votes on 5575 and endorse comex x4.
>>
>> Too late; the decision to adopt proposal 5575 has already been re
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 11:14 PM, Ben Caplan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >5583 O1 1ais523 Right to Vanish
>> AGAINST*10 (shouldn't be such an easy way out of contracts; if you really
>> want a get-out like that it should have a longer auto-exile)
>
> In particular, it should be at leas
root wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Ben Caplan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> FORx4. I also retract my votes on 5575 and endorse comex x4.
>
> Too late; the decision to adopt proposal 5575 has already been resolved.
Looking at the headers, it seems that Pavitra's clock was off. Pav
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Ben Caplan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FORx4. I also retract my votes on 5575 and endorse comex x4.
Too late; the decision to adopt proposal 5575 has already been resolved.
-root
> >5583 O1 1ais523 Right to Vanish
> AGAINST*10 (shouldn't be such an easy way out of contracts; if you really
> want a get-out like that it should have a longer auto-exile)
In particular, it should be at least as long as the maximum possible
tariff of exile (240 days).
2008/7/1 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> 5582 O0 1ais523 another probably unsuccessful attempt at...
> FOR * 6
It's democratic.
>5577 O1 1comex I don't deserve Scamster!
AGAINSTx2
>5578 O1 1.5 Murphy Easier cleanup of one-off pledges
FORx2
>5579 D0 3Quazie Race the Hare.
FOR
>5580 D1 3SgeoHolidays are sacred
FOR
>5581 D0 2SgeoRibbon Clarification
AGAINST (Is it unco
2008/6/30 Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ehird wrote:
>
>>> 5577 O1 1comex I don't deserve Scamster!
>> AGAINSTx4
> [etc.]
>
> Unsuccessful because you aren't an eligible voter.
>
Yes, I remembered that now.
ehird wrote:
>> 5577 O1 1comex I don't deserve Scamster!
> AGAINSTx4
[etc.]
Unsuccessful because you aren't an eligible voter.
2008/6/28 Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You can't vote on these proposals. Here's part of the distribution
> message that you didn't quote:
>
> | The eligible voters for ordinary
> |proposals are the active players, the eligible voters for democratic
> |proposal
Elliott Hird wrote:
>>5577 O1 1comex I don't deserve Scamster!
>AGAINSTx4
You can't vote on these proposals. Here's part of the distribution
message that you didn't quote:
| The eligible voters for ordinary
|proposals are the active players, the el
13 matches
Mail list logo
