I like how this aspect of nomic feels like Poker lol.
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:02 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
> > $ echo 'It is possible to win by destroying Stamps in the possession of
> others' | shasum -a 256
> > 204aa33ed7c42e58d6f391b38
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> $ echo 'It is possible to win by destroying Stamps in the possession of
> others' | shasum -a 256
> 204aa33ed7c42e58d6f391b3878dc89738c8a1bb95b39b3ebcda2609c1fabe3c -
On Sep 7, 2017, at 7:55 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> Can you explain to a tech
On 09/07/17 18:53, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>> On Sep 7, 2017, at 1:58 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>>
>> Seeing as I have to recordkeep the damn thing, I also so pledge. Gaelan, can
>> you send that my way, as well? My From: address is fine.
>>
>> Note that I am already in possession of information wh
Can you explain to a technological neophate how to decrypt that?
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
>> On Sep 7, 2017, at 1:58 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>>
>> Seeing as I have to recordkeep the damn thing, I also so pledge. Gaelan, can
>> you send that my way, as well? My Fro
> On Sep 7, 2017, at 1:58 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
> Seeing as I have to recordkeep the damn thing, I also so pledge. Gaelan, can
> you send that my way, as well? My From: address is fine.
>
> Note that I am already in possession of information whose sha256 is
> 204aa33ed7c42e58d6f391b3878d
This doesn’t work because Agora doesn’t have enough shines.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 7, 2017, at 1:26 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>
> Small re-attempt because what I just did likely didn't work:
>
> I destroy all stamps and cause Agora to tr
I pledge not to reveal or exploit the information without the consent of Gaelan.
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Good enough. I’ll email you in a second. I’m probably being too careful here,
> but just in case: let it be known that I possess the ideas contained in the
> p
Due to quantity would be my guess. The rule reads "a stamp", the attempt
was made for "all stamps". It seems to me that the rules requires an
announcement for each stamp that the player wishes to destroy.
On Sep 6, 2017 11:39 PM, "Gaelan Steele" wrote:
This probably didn’t succeed. I will (priva
This probably didn’t succeed. I will (privately) explain why to anybody who
pledges not to reveal or exploit the information until I do, probably after the
next floating value update.
Gaelan
> On Sep 6, 2017, at 10:26 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>
> Small re-attempt because what I just did likely d
9 matches
Mail list logo
