If no one objects to you doing it that way, your plan sounds good to
me. Thanks for clarifying!
-Aris
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 6:46 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> Sure.
>
> You are correct that I was over-broad in suggesting that *any* contract
> would work, as I was picturing the previous version
Sure.
You are correct that I was over-broad in suggesting that *any* contract
would work, as I was picturing the previous version of Contracts in my
mind. Obviously, for example, Hashed contracts wouldn't do the trick.
I would amend that with a simple asterisk, to say "Is the Jargon in a
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
2. Not only does the chosen term ("reiterate") have a common use that
makes sense in context of voting, but the common use is actually opposite
the proposed meaning! To "reiterate" means to "restate clearly". If you
say "I hereby restate my name for the
3 matches
Mail list logo
