DIS: Re: CJF (Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7922-7929)

2017-10-23 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Sat, 21 Oct 2017, ATMunn . wrote: I'm just going to make sure my vote actually changes. If, despite the aforementioned October 19 post, my vote on proposals 7922-7929 has not changed, I vote as follows: Fortunately for you the judgement was that the previous one worked, because I don't

Re: DIS: Re: CJF (Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7922-7929)

2017-10-22 Thread Aris Merchant
True, I suppose. I have a feeling "can by regulation" would probably allow regulations either by announcement or with notice, but that's not the end of the world. -Aris On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 12:22 AM, Alex Smith wrote: > On Sun, 2017-10-22 at 00:16 -0700, Aris

Re: DIS: Re: CJF (Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7922-7929)

2017-10-22 Thread Alex Smith
On Sun, 2017-10-22 at 00:16 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote: > Again, voting for both this and contracts is a rather bad idea, > because they conflict. This removes regulations, which contracts > uses. The contracts proposal doesn't /need/ regulations for anything fundamental, though. It'd be easy

DIS: Re: CJF (Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7922-7929)

2017-10-22 Thread Aris Merchant
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 6:22 AM, ATMunn . wrote: > I'm just going to make sure my vote actually changes. > > If, despite the aforementioned October 19 post, my vote on proposals > 7922-7929 has not changed, I vote as follows: ... > 7925: FOR Again, voting for both this

DIS: Re: CJF (Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7922-7929)

2017-10-21 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sat, 21 Oct 2017, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > (Also I would like to remind G. of my other two outstanding CFJs, in a message > with a perhaps confusing subject starting "BUS: DIS: CFJ".) I've been trying out batch-assigning once a week and those were 5 days ago - if the delays are being too

DIS: Re: CJF (Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7922-7929)

2017-10-21 Thread ATMunn .
That's a good point you have there. I blame Gmail. On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 10:52 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > I CFJ on > > In a below quoted message of 19 October, ATMunn succeeded in changing > eir votes. > > Argument: The plain text version of the message has