Thanks.
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 at 17:35 VJ Rada wrote:
> To answer your question, Alexis, here is the Rulekeepor resolution.
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 5:45 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> > I resolve the agoran decisions for the determination of the registrar,
> > superintendent, surveyor, arbitor, rulekee
To answer your question, Alexis, here is the Rulekeepor resolution.
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 5:45 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> I resolve the agoran decisions for the determination of the registrar,
> superintendent, surveyor, arbitor, rulekeepor, referee, promotor and
> tailor. The quorum was 2.0, the val
ais523 and I were discussing on IRC the possibility of doing away with
officeholders and instead having most game functionality in contracts that
track themselves.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 22, 2017, at 10:54 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
> On Sep 22, 2017, at 9:13 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> wrote:
>
> We could also just make all assets ownable by persons or make all assets go
> at reregistration to Agora, but then they may be reclaimed upon registration,
> in quantities decreasing over time.
That’s workable for fu
We could also just make all assets ownable by persons or make all assets go at
reregistration to Agora, but then they may be reclaimed upon registration, in
quantities decreasing over time.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 22, 2017, at 9:08 PM,
> On Sep 21, 2017, at 10:24 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> It occurs to me that (thinking back over a couple years), several registration
> errors have been ratified, and given that this kicks people out of the game,
> it's a fairly big error that can lead to anger. Also changes in registrati
> On Sep 21, 2017, at 9:33 AM, grok (caleb vines) wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 2:45 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
>> Registrar
>> This result has changed. Nichdel had three first-preference votes, but
>> PSS had six and remains registrar. This resolver disagrees with the
>> result. Anyway.
>
I agree with these suggestions.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 21, 2017, at 10:32 AM, grok (caleb vines) wrote:
>
> Monthly ratification would be a positive step. Maybe increasing the
> window of self-ratification for Registrar reports only. M
Monthly ratification would be a positive step. Maybe increasing the
window of self-ratification for Registrar reports only. Maybe both in
combination.
-grok
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> It occurs to me that (thinking back over a couple years), several registration
It occurs to me that (thinking back over a couple years), several registration
errors have been ratified, and given that this kicks people out of the game,
it's a fairly big error that can lead to anger. Also changes in registration
are infrequent enough that a weekly reset isn't needed, it's n
No one made any campaign or supporting/opposing speeches during the election,
at least not that I saw? This is key to any election that's actually
contested. Reading your vote, it seemed like a general preference against
incumbency, but not as if you had any direct reason to protest against PS
I'd like to remind you that I apologized and did not intend to make that error,
having believed that I had corrected it. Also, I would like to specify that my
methods for doing the report have changed hopefully reducing error.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.c
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 2:45 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
> Registrar
> This result has changed. Nichdel had three first-preference votes, but
> PSS had six and remains registrar. This resolver disagrees with the
> result. Anyway.
Either people forgot that PSS attempted to deregister me by
ratific
13 matches
Mail list logo
