You might want to have a look at the IADoP report I prepared for my
planned deputisation, see below.
I've fixed the spurious misalignments, added the Agoran Newspaper in
the list of reports and added a column with the spending power of the
various offices which you're supposed to track.
---
O
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Alex Smith wrote:
> Does this mean that either me or omd has a dictatorship? I seem to
> remember taking steps to relinquish one if I had it, and can't remember
> if I did something with it first.
If yours worked, you repealed it on October 11 and gained a win
(message belo
On Sun, 2015-03-29 at 12:02 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> 10. HOWEVER, no one goes back and re-calls the original question; in
> THIS PARTICULAR case, whether omd's 3.9 days was insufficient while
> ais523's 4.1 days was sufficient.
>
> So the question remains unresolved.
This fits wit
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015, Alex Smith wrote:
> > On Sat, 2015-03-28 at 06:39 -0700, Edward Murphy wrote:
> > > For the record, this dates back to the IADoP report of 2014-10-15, and
> > > was equally vague back then.
Ok, here's a timeline, starting in Sept:
1
On Sat, 28 Mar 2015, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-03-28 at 06:39 -0700, Edward Murphy wrote:
> > For the record, this dates back to the IADoP report of 2014-10-15, and
> > was equally vague back then. A quick scan of a-b around that same time
> > turns up an attempted scam involving the offic
On Sat, 2015-03-28 at 06:39 -0700, Edward Murphy wrote:
> For the record, this dates back to the IADoP report of 2014-10-15, and
> was equally vague back then. A quick scan of a-b around that same time
> turns up an attempted scam involving the office, but nothing obviously
> suggesting that Rule 2
ais523 wrote:
On Sat, 2015-03-28 at 05:17 -0700, Edward Murphy wrote:
~ May not exist (reason unknown)
If we had a working criminal justice system, I'd consider crimming you
for excessive vagueness here. (I'd identify the violated rule as 2143,
and conveniently neglect to identify which par
On Sat, 2015-03-28 at 05:17 -0700, Edward Murphy wrote:
> ~ May not exist (reason unknown)
If we had a working criminal justice system, I'd consider crimming you
for excessive vagueness here. (I'd identify the violated rule as 2143,
and conveniently neglect to identify which paragraph.)
Part of
8 matches
Mail list logo
