On Sat, 2014-11-01 at 15:30 -0700, Eritivus wrote:
> Sorry, what errors exactly?
>
The ones where the rules letting non-DMs act were never created.
> My understanding would have been that, as DM, it would be legal for
> you to ratify the Warrigal's hypothetical changes.
It's ambiguous whether it
Sorry, what errors exactly?
My understanding would have been that, as DM, it would be legal for you to
ratify the Warrigal's hypothetical changes.
Apologies for the HTML, I hope a plaintext part comes through...
2 matches
Mail list logo