On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
An attempt to performed a fee-based action is also implicitly a
claim to be in possession of sufficient ergs to perform the
action, and such a claim is self-ratifying. If the claim is
erroneous but
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
I would think the Power Station Manager would be primarily responsible
for tracking transactions and ensuring that no player exceed eir
weekly allowance of ergs. If e's already doing that, it probably
wouldn't be
Proto: new system v0.2
[Keeps major arcana, puts in basic fee-based system]
[Took all the wording/bug fix suggestions. Under the principle of
minimizing amount of change in a given overhaul (yes I learned my
lesson from Cards) I've left the major arcana positions, leadership
tokens, etc. as
On 01/12/2010 11:06 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Create the following rule, Energy, power-2:
Ergs are a class of fixed assets and a measure of each Player's
energy; to increase or decrease an entity's energy is to change
the number of ergs in eir possession. Ownership of Ergs is
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
A thought: Because all ergs are destroyed each week, it makes no sense for
the
PSM to have to publish a report once a week.
I was thinking it was useful to publish a list of spending (e.g. actions
performed in the prior week). But maybe that's not
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Title: Minister without Portfolio.
Title: Majority Leader.
And yes I just caught the little cut/no paste vanishing act here...
On 01/12/2010 11:19 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
A thought: Because all ergs are destroyed each week, it makes no sense for the
PSM to have to publish a report once a week.
I was thinking it was useful to publish a list of spending (e.g. actions
performed in
On 01/12/2010 11:06 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
An attempt to performed a fee-based action is also implicitly a
claim to be in possession of sufficient ergs to perform the
action, and such a claim is self-ratifying. If the claim is
erroneous but self-ratifies, then the
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
On 01/12/2010 11:19 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
A thought: Because all ergs are destroyed each week, it makes no sense for
the
PSM to have to publish a report once a week.
I was thinking it was useful to publish a
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
These should all be charges of ergs, not fees (no semantic reason, it's just
an
extension of the metaphor).
Ooh, good one.
Making Rest destruction be 1 erg seems low; that means even the most basic of
players can abolish 4 of eir own Rests per week.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/12/2010 11:19 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Sean Hunt wrote:
A thought: Because all ergs are destroyed each week, it makes no sense
for the
PSM to have to publish a report once a week.
I was thinking
11 matches
Mail list logo
