On Thu, 2017-09-28 at 14:24 -0400, ATMunn . wrote:
> What exactly is quorum? I read rule 879 stating that it's a thing,
> but it doesn't seem to explain what it is and what it means.
It's a mechanism that causes votes to end with no result if not enough
people participate in them. This exists in
On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, ATMunn . wrote:
> What exactly is quorum? I read rule 879 stating that it's a thing,
> but it doesn't seem to explain what it is and what it means.
R955: "If there is more than one option, and the number of valid
ballots is less than the quorum of that decision, the
What exactly is quorum? I read rule 879 stating that it's a thing, but it
doesn't seem to explain what it is and what it means.
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 7:37 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
> >> On Sep 24, 2017, at 10:41 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
> >
> > A few more
>> On Sep 24, 2017, at 10:41 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
>
> A few more questions about offices:
>
> When do elections happen? Just whenever the ADoP feels like starting one?
>Whenever someone starts one with either support, vacancy, or the expiration of
>90 days.
Or when the
>One office that I could go for that doesn't seem too difficult is the
>>> Tailor. If an election for it comes up, I'll definitely vote for
>>> myself.
G. actually won that election like two days ago :(
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:05 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
> On second
On second thought, I don't think I really want the responsibilities of an
office yet. I think I'll stay unemployed for now.
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 3:26 PM, ATMunn . wrote:
> Thanks, everyone, for your answers.
>
> I'm not too interested in the Superintendent office, so
orthand is used a lot.
>
>
> On Sun, 24 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> > Yeah.
> >
> > -- Forwarded message -
> > From: ATMunn . <iamingodsa...@gmail.com>
> > Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 at 17:37
> > Subject: Re: DIS: Various qu
> action, but that's enforced with a SHOULD and hardly anyone ever does,
> and shorthand is used a lot.
>
>
>> On Sun, 24 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>> Yeah.
>>
>> -- Forwarded message -
>> From: ATMunn . <iamingodsa...@gmail.com&
Cuddle Beam wrote:
> Yeah.
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: ATMunn . <iamingodsa...@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 at 17:37
> Subject: Re: DIS: Various questions
> To: Agora Nomic discussions (DF) <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org>
>
Yeah.
-- Forwarded message -
From: ATMunn . <iamingodsa...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 at 17:37
Subject: Re: DIS: Various questions
To: Agora Nomic discussions (DF) <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org>
I see.
When something says that you can do something "wi
I see.
When something says that you can do something "with support," does that
mean that you say you're going to do something, people decide whether or
not to support you, and if there's enough support it happens?
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 24, 2017, at 10:41 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
>
> A few more questions about offices:
>
> When do elections happen? Just whenever the ADoP feels like starting one?
Whenever someone starts
A few more questions about offices:
When do elections happen? Just whenever the ADoP feels like starting one?
How exactly does deputisation work? Do you just say "I deputize for this
office" and if nobody objects, you get the office? The rule on that is
kinda tricky to understand.
On Sat, Sep
On Sat, 23 Sep 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> The catching up since that last holders is the hardest part, when I took
> over the office of Registrar, I had to go back at least five years,
> updating records.
Just in the specific Tailor case, I was thinking all of the recent
> On Sep 23, 2017, at 4:26 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> wrote:
>
> The history section of the monthly report seems to have been left in extreme
> disrepair. When I took it, I was told it would be find to leave it behind,
> but I wanted to
The history section of the monthly report seems to have been left in extreme
disrepair. When I took it, I was told it would be find to leave it behind, but
I wanted to update it.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 23, 2017, at 4:24 PM, Owen
> On Sep 23, 2017, at 4:22 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> wrote:
>
> The catching up since that last holders is the hardest part, when I took over
> the office of Registrar, I had to go back at least five years, updating
> records.
The
The catching up since that last holders is the hardest part, when I took over
the office of Registrar, I had to go back at least five years, updating records.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 23, 2017, at 4:03 PM, Kerim Aydin
I was elected to the office in that last big batch of elections (I *think*
we got the resolutions done correctly now!).
I'm happy to give it up, it was mainly because no one else volunteered.
There were several ribbon awards given recently and you might want to
wait until I catch it up (was
typo: offixe
Otherwise sounds good
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Title: Vacant Deputisation Fix
> Power:3
> Text: {
> Replace the second item of the second numbered list of "Deputisation",
> with the
Title: Vacant Deputisation Fix
Power:3
Text: {
Replace the second item of the second numbered list of "Deputisation", with the
following:
2. Either (i) A time limit by which the rules require the action to be
performed has expired or (ii) the offixe is vacant.
}
I think this should fix
On Sat, 2017-09-23 at 15:26 -0400, ATMunn . wrote:
> One office that I could go for that doesn't seem too difficult is the
> Tailor. If an election for it comes up, I'll definitely vote for
> myself.
> (Or could I deputize for it? I still don't fully understand the
> deputisation thing)
It became
Thanks, everyone, for your answers.
I'm not too interested in the Superintendent office, so I don't think I'll
go for that.
I could go for the Referee, since o said e wouldn't mind me taking it, but
I'm not really sure I want it either.
One office that I could go for that doesn't seem too
> On Sep 23, 2017, at 2:10 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
>
> * Voting to enter a CFJ into moot if there’s a serious doubt about the
> judgement (r. 911, rare),
This has happened for the first time relatively recently and it has come up a
few times since.
> * Voting to win
On Sep 23, 2017, at 10:47 AM, Nic Evans wrote:
> Assessor, Arbitor, Rulekeepor, Tailor, and Secretary are generally held by
> more experienced players because they're complex and important.
Objection! I took over Secretary very, very early in my tenure, as Murphy had
gone
On Sep 23, 2017, at 10:21 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
> I've put together a list of various different questions I have. I don't
> expect all of them to get answered, but feel free to answer any that you can.
>
>
>
> What is the whole "floating
On 09/23/17 09:21, ATMunn . wrote:
> I've put together a list of various different questions I have. I
> don't expect all of them to get answered, but feel free to answer any
> that you can.
>
>
>
> What is the whole "floating value" thing? What determines it,
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 23, 2017, at 10:21 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
>
> I've put together a list of various different questions I have. I don't
> expect all of them to get answered, but feel free to answer any
I've put together a list of various different questions I have. I don't
expect all of them to get answered, but feel free to answer any that you
can.
What is the whole "floating value" thing? What determines it, and what does
it do? It's not really clear in the
29 matches
Mail list logo