On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:48 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2017, CuddleBeam wrote:
> > We could define "privacy" in the tourney's rules.
>
> Yes, I agree, it's simple to add an asterisk to the tourney regulations
> with a statement: "a message is private if and only if ...(whatever)
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017, CuddleBeam wrote:
> We could define "privacy" in the tourney's rules.
Yes, I agree, it's simple to add an asterisk to the tourney regulations
with a statement: "a message is private if and only if ...(whatever)".
Doesn't matter if it's arbitrary ("a message to everyone's re
We could define "privacy" in the tourney's rules.
I also find the private/public dichotomy to be weak. I can, instead of
posting to the public fora, just get everyone's emails and send them an
email straight to them individually but with the same message. It's private!
Keeping information secret
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> Giving karma to another person may be done by sending a private
> notification to them ...
Proto-CFJs for discussion:
1. A message sent via a Discussion forum, addressing (in the message text)
a player known to post to the Discussi
4 matches
Mail list logo
