On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which attempts failed, mine that were part of my judgement, or others?
> I think the one that was part of my judgement should have worked. -Goethe
I meant the earlier attempts, before the contract change was announced.
Inc
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> No, the attempts to deregister it were based upon the belief that the
>>> Manroster only contained ehird (and e was therefore the only partner).
>>> It now turns out that the Manroste
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> No, the attempts to deregister it were based upon the belief that the
>> Manroster only contained ehird (and e was therefore the only partner).
>> It now turns out that the Manroster actually only contained Ivan Hope
>> CXXVI
root wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Good catch. As ehird isn't registered, E isn't a player, so E can't
>>> be in the manroster regardless of what the manroster says (unless the
>>> contract somehow has a greater power than the rule indicating
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Good catch. As ehird isn't registered, E isn't a player, so E can't
>> be in the manroster regardless of what the manroster says (unless the
>> contract somehow has a greater power than the rule indicating what a
>> player i
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> More specifically: The contract originally known as Teh Cltohed Mna [1]
> and renamed to ehrid [2] contains an explicit list of its members,
> titled the Manroster.
Actually, the contract doesn't claim the Manroster is a list
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
> 2008/6/27 Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> In that case, ehrid still has two partners, so the attempts to
>> deregister it were unsuccessful. Updating records accordingly.
>>
>>
>
> But the Manroster contains a non-player (me). The contract states
> it
ehird wrote:
> 2008/6/27 Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Was Manroster a public contract? I've lost track of that. If so,
>> the official membership list doesn't change until the change is
>> published (R2178). -Goethe
>
> The Manroster is just a list in the ehrid/mna contract.
More speci
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Alexander Smith wrote:
> Goethe wrote:
>> Was Manroster a public contract? I've lost track of that. If so,
>> the official membership list doesn't change until the change is
>> published (R2178).
>
> No, it was internal state of a public contract, but not state that
> appea
2008/6/27 Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In that case, ehrid still has two partners, so the attempts to
> deregister it were unsuccessful. Updating records accordingly.
>
>
But the Manroster contains a non-player (me). The contract states
it is a list of players.
???
ehird
Quazie wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:05 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Goethe wrote:
>>> The contract mentioned in the CFJ, at the time it was filed, had the
>>> following text:
>>>
>>> {{{
>>> There is a
ehird wrote:
> The Manroster is just a list in the ehrid/mna contract.
Not even that, the contract states the existence of such a
list and its initial value, but not its current state. So its
a list in the internal gamestate of the mna contract.
--
ais523
<>
2008/6/27 Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Was Manroster a public contract? I've lost track of that. If so,
> the official membership list doesn't change until the change is
> published (R2178). -Goethe
The Manroster is just a list in the ehrid/mna contract.
ehird
Goethe wrote:
> Was Manroster a public contract? I've lost track of that. If so,
> the official membership list doesn't change until the change is
> published (R2178).
No, it was internal state of a public contract, but not state that
appeared in the text of that contract.
--
ais523
<>
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Alexander Smith wrote:
> Evidence on CFJ 2046:
>
> comex wrote:
>> Actually, if I deregistered ehird before e attempted to change the
>> Manroster, ehird was no longer a player in the Manroster, so e was not
>> able to change it.
> Ah, good catch. In that case, I may have been
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:05 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Goethe wrote:
>> The contract mentioned in the CFJ, at the time it was filed, had the
>> following text:
>>
>> {{{
>> There is a list of players called
16 matches
Mail list logo
