2009/9/1 Ed Murphy :
> Wooble wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Jonatan
>> Kilhamn wrote:
>>> XTiger (+2)
>>
>>> X Chief Whip - number of votes gained after name
>>
>> CoE: you're not the Chief Whip anymore.
>
> Also, a standing request to whoever is the Chief Whip: please
> point it out
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 9:13 AM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Goethe wrote:
> Anyway, replace "as soon as possible" at the end of the proposal with
> "immediately", and a deputy could flip them all back within 2 days,
> which should be
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 9:13 AM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Goethe wrote:
>> I submit the following proposal, Pragmatic Caste, AI-2:
> This almost allows a trivial dictatorship scam, by flipping
> everyone else's caste to Savage and then making dictatorship
> proposals (outracing
Goethe wrote:
> I submit the following proposal, Pragmatic Caste, AI-2:
This almost allows a trivial dictatorship scam, by flipping
everyone else's caste to Savage and then making dictatorship
proposals (outracing the inevitable criminal CFJs). It would
fail if the Grand Poobah was not the IADoP (b
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, comex wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> So, can anyone explain to me what is going on and what I need to do
>>> using two syllable words or less?
>>
>> The rule says you SHALL (list of actions), but doesn't say that you
>> CAN,
BobTHJ wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> Goethe wrote:
>>>
In this case, all demotions failed, as BobTHJ would have had to demote
a Beta first. (I think once you do skip a step, everything after
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Goethe wrote:
>>
>>> In this case, all demotions failed, as BobTHJ would have had to demote
>>> a Beta first. (I think once you do skip a step, everything after that is
>>> platonic
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Goethe wrote:
>
>> In this case, all demotions failed, as BobTHJ would have had to demote
>> a Beta first. (I think once you do skip a step, everything after that is
>> platonically blocked because the CAN implied with the SHALL is pegged
>> to doing things
Goethe wrote:
> In this case, all demotions failed, as BobTHJ would have had to demote
> a Beta first. (I think once you do skip a step, everything after that is
> platonically blocked because the CAN implied with the SHALL is pegged
> to doing things in order, if you do it out of order, you n
9 matches
Mail list logo
