Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Significant Moran's I?

2003-07-24 Thread Roger Bivand
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Russell Barbour wrote: > To measure auto-coorelation Moran's I is compared to the expected "I" that > would be generated from a random distribution. My question is if the observed > Moran's I is more than one standard deviation higher than expected "I" could > that be consi

AI-GEOSTATS: Significant Moran's I?

2003-07-10 Thread Russell Barbour
To measure auto-coorelation Moran's I is compared to the expected "I" that would be generated from a random distribution. My question is if the observed Moran's I is more than one standard deviation higher than expected "I" could that be considered significant auto-correlation? Thanks Russell