On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Roland Kuhn wrote:
>
> 8 apr 2014 kl. 21:10 skrev √iktor Ҡlang :
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 9:56 PM, Martijn Hoekstra <
> martijnhoeks...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:25 PM, √iktor Ҡlang wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Ap
8 apr 2014 kl. 21:10 skrev √iktor Ҡlang :
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 9:56 PM, Martijn Hoekstra
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:25 PM, √iktor Ҡlang wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Daniel Armak wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Roland Kuhn wr
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 9:56 PM, Martijn Hoekstra
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:25 PM, √iktor Ҡlang wrote:
>
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Daniel Armak wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Roland Kuhn wrote:
>>>
The release of Akka 2.4 is quite a whil
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:25 PM, √iktor Ҡlang wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Daniel Armak wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Roland Kuhn wrote:
>>
>>> The release of Akka 2.4 is quite a while out (precise details will be
>>> forthcoming, but we might not correla
Would that include the new reactive streams?
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 9:25 PM, √iktor Ҡlang wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Daniel Armak wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Roland Kuhn wrote:
>>
>>> The release of Akka 2.4 is quite a while out (precise details wi
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Daniel Armak wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Roland Kuhn wrote:
>
>> The release of Akka 2.4 is quite a while out (precise details will be
>> forthcoming, but we might not correlate it with the availability of the
>> HTTP module).
>>
>
> I don
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Roland Kuhn wrote:
> The release of Akka 2.4 is quite a while out (precise details will be
> forthcoming, but we might not correlate it with the availability of the
> HTTP module).
>
I don't understand your wording, could you please clarify what you mean?
Will the
Thanks for the feedback Andrew, please rest assured that the replacement
for Pipelines is looking to be quite awesome.
Having been involved in this project since its first day as a public
project, one of the things I've learned is that adding features is easy,
adding the right features is hard. Kn
On Tuesday, April 8, 2014 6:27:44 PM UTC+4, √ wrote:
>
> Well said, Roland.
>
Being one of removal-affected Akka users, at the moment I have just moved
to netty.io during a couple of days (custom protocol with ~ dozen
messages). Knowing main pipeline architecture ideas it was really easy
migrat
Well said, Roland.
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Roland Kuhn wrote:
> Hi Eirik,
>
> 8 apr 2014 kl. 14:53 skrev Eirik :
>
> Great that you improve the API inspired by rxjava.
>
> However you should have handled the transition to the new API better. You
> should have deprecated the module in 2.
Hi Eirik,
8 apr 2014 kl. 14:53 skrev Eirik :
> Great that you improve the API inspired by rxjava.
>
> However you should have handled the transition to the new API better. You
> should have deprecated the module in 2.3.
>
> Just removing the entire experimental feature is kinda f u to develope
Great, I'll be :)
--
>> Read the docs: http://akka.io/docs/
>> Check the FAQ: http://akka.io/faq/
>> Search the archives: https://groups.google.com/group/akka-user
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Akka
User Lis
Hi Andrew,
we have proposed conference presentations about this topic in April, which
means that we have quite some interest in getting something ready before
then. You'll be the first to see the announcement on this mailing list :-)
Regards,
Roland
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Andrew Gay
On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:21:46 AM UTC+4, rkuhn wrote:
>
> We know that people have been running their business on a 1.0 milestone of
> Akka, or used the experimental Cluster successfully, and this has maybe led
> to the expectation that even our experiments are highly reliable—which we
Hi Peter,
21 jan 2014 kl. 22:27 skrev Peter :
> Hi Roland
>
> I have a similar situation as Andrew but have been looking forward to 2.3 for
> the protobuf 2.5.0 dependency (vs protobuf 2.4.1 in akka 2.2.3). I've made
> use of your suggestion and copied Pipelines.scala & TcpPipelineHandler.scal
17 jan 2014 kl. 00:36 skrev Ivan Topolnjak :
> Roland, that's quite a surprise! looking forward to these Reactive Streams!
> is there any branch for impatient people to follow? best regards!
There is no public branch yet, we’ll send out a pointer as soon as there is
something meaningful to loo
Roland, that's quite a surprise! looking forward to these Reactive Streams!
is there any branch for impatient people to follow? best regards!
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Roland Kuhn wrote:
> Dear hakkers,
>
> the first release candidate for Akka 2.3.0 is waiting just around the
> corner, a
Dear hakkers,
the first release candidate for Akka 2.3.0 is waiting just around the corner,
and as the subject says, the Pipeline infrastructure in our shiny new Akka IO
package, which was introduced in version 2.2.0, will be discontinued. The whole
IO subsystem was marked “experimental” throug
18 matches
Mail list logo
