Re: [algogeeks] Aps

2011-09-08 Thread sharmila saru
ANSWER: 45 On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Mani Bharathi manibharat...@gmail.comwrote: While traveling at uniform speed. U read a two digit no. after one hr the number is reversed order. After another hour the number read is same two digit number. What is the average speed? -- You

[algogeeks] Aps

2011-09-07 Thread Mani Bharathi
While traveling at uniform speed. U read a two digit no. after one hr the number is reversed order. After another hour the number read is same two digit number. What is the average speed? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To

[algogeeks] Aps

2011-09-07 Thread Mani Bharathi
*There were few elephants and an equal number of mahouts.Half of the mahouts were sitting on the elephants and half were walking.Totally there was 84 legs,hw many elephants were there?* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To view

Re: [algogeeks] Aps

2011-09-07 Thread Ishan Aggarwal
14 elephants On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Mani Bharathi manibharat...@gmail.comwrote: *There were few elephants and an equal number of mahouts.Half of the mahouts were sitting on the elephants and half were walking.Totally there was 84 legs,hw many elephants were there?* -- You

Re: [algogeeks] Aps

2011-09-07 Thread Mani Bharathi
how? mahouts sitting on the elephants shouldn't be considered -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/algogeeks/-/9hWKNBJXPYEJ. To post to this group, send

Re: [algogeeks] Aps

2011-09-07 Thread Ishan Aggarwal
why wont u consider those.. Its no where mentioned in the problem that u are not supposed to count those mahouts sitting on the elephants... The statement is just to make it tricky nothing else... On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Mani Bharathi manibharat...@gmail.comwrote: how? mahouts

Re: [algogeeks] Aps

2011-09-07 Thread Dheeraj Sharma
am getting 16.8 elephants :( ...if i dont consider the legs of mahout that are sitting on elephant On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Ishan Aggarwal ishan.aggarwal.1...@gmail.com wrote: why wont u consider those.. Its no where mentioned in the problem that u are not supposed to count those

Re: [algogeeks] Aps

2011-09-07 Thread Mani Bharathi
which one is right? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/algogeeks/-/ZQGyC-Ku3bEJ. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To

Re: [algogeeks] Aps

2011-09-07 Thread rahul vatsa
ishant is rt, nowher in the qstn its mentioned dat oly standing legs hs to be counted. so 84/(2+4) = 14 pair of elements mahouts. On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Mani Bharathi manibharat...@gmail.comwrote: which one is right? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: [algogeeks] Aps

2011-09-07 Thread Shiwakant Bharti
Lets consider there are n elephants so there are equal number of mahaouts ie n. Now if we consider only men standing on ground to be counter for legs it comes out to be 4n + (n/2)*2 = 5n, so 84 should be multiple of 5n which is not hence this assumption of counting only standing men for legs is