We should return curr-next in the last statement of ur code
On Aug 18, 7:08 am, Dipankar Patro dip10c...@gmail.com wrote:
A slight change in above code:
make it
while(cur cur-next)
^^ other wise the code will crash at last element in a prefect list, with no
loop.
On 18 August 2011 07:36,
we can do that too.
But if I return cur then I can myself print cur, cur-next, cur-next-prev.
for verification.
On 18 August 2011 11:56, Vijay Kansal vijaykans...@gmail.com wrote:
We should return curr-next in the last statement of ur code
On Aug 18, 7:08 am, Dipankar Patro
Hi Piyuesh Same Question i Faced Some Times Ago, Have a look at algo/code
let me know if any test case missed ?
http://shashank7s.blogspot.com/2011/05/wap-to-detect-loop-in-doubly-linked.html
if we wants to remove loop from DLL, we can do in the same way we used to do
for singly linked
