Re: [algogeeks] Re: An interesting question

2011-09-17 Thread kumar anurag
This will work in GCC but not in G++ int main() { int new=1; return 0; } There can be many programs of C++ , that cannot be compiled through GCC bcz C++ is OOP for which G++ is needed. On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 1:50 AM, SAMMM somnath.nit...@gmail.com wrote: You can try this also this will

[algogeeks] Re: An Interesting Question Calculate nth Power of Integer

2011-03-26 Thread tec
For big number mathematics, the multiplication time complexity is not O(1). And the programming complexity is to be considered as well. On Mar 24, 3:36 pm, radha krishnan radhakrishnance...@gmail.com wrote: You can do it in (log n) assuming multiplication is O(1) suppose u are going to

[algogeeks] Re: An interesting question

2011-03-09 Thread bittu
@yoku..r u sure..in 2nd last for loop by just setting if (matrix[0] [0]==0) e.g. matrix[i][0]=0 and temp=0 e.g. (a[j][0]=0) u r doing what asked in questionset a[i][j] or a[j][i] =0 if any a[i] or a[j=0 ..i means r u sure that u r not skipping any row or colum although u code is working

[algogeeks] Re: An interesting question

2011-03-09 Thread yogesh kumar
@bittu I am 100% sure, it works fine for any 2D Binary matrix. Algorithm: Step 1: Store matrix [0][0] value in a temporary variable (Space Complicity: O(1) ). Step 2: Apply operation on first column and save it into Temp. Step 3: Apply operation on first row and save it into

Re: [algogeeks] Re: An interesting question

2011-03-08 Thread saurabh agrawal
@rajnish: i think u missed the point , the matrix is binary.. so how will you store -1 in it. @pacific: Will you solution work fine if 0 th row has all 1's and 0th column has atleast one zero.?? On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 1:09 AM, yogesh kumar yoku2...@gmail.com wrote: @pacific: Good Algorithm

[algogeeks] Re: An interesting question

2011-03-06 Thread yogesh kumar
@pacific: Good Algorithm // This is the preface solution of this problem [:)] // Time complexity: O(n^2) // Space complexity: O(1) public class BinaryMatrix { public static void main(String arg[]) { int[][] matrix = new int[][]

Re: [algogeeks] Re: An interesting question

2011-03-02 Thread Kunal Patil
Nice explanation n nice code... On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 8:38 PM, gaurav gupta 1989.gau...@googlemail.comwrote: @pacific in your case a[0][0] might be wrong. So lets do this : a[0][0] = a[0][0 to n-1] a[1 to n-1][0] // of all elements in first row and first column for( int i=1; in; i++)

Re: [algogeeks] Re: An interesting question

2011-03-01 Thread gaurav gupta
@pacific Absolutely correct. Thanks for the explanation. On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 6:14 PM, pacific pacific pacific4...@gmail.comwrote: 1. do operation on all the values in each column and store it in the first row of each column 2. do operation on all the values in each row and store it in

[algogeeks] Re: An interesting question

2011-03-01 Thread Gaurav Gupta
@pacific in your case a[0][0] might be wrong. So lets do this : a[0][0] = a[0][0 to n-1] a[1 to n-1][0] // of all elements in first row and first column for( int i=1; in; i++) { for( int j=1;jn;j++) { a[0][i] = a[j][i]; // a[0][i] contains of all elements of ith

Re: [algogeeks] Re: An interesting question

2011-03-01 Thread gaurav gupta
@Rajnish, Your algorithm works fine. If I'm not wrong you want to differentiate between initial zeros(-1) and zeros(0) inserted by replacement. As I said its a binary matrix, So what I meant was the array can contain only 0's and 1's. Sorry if it was not clear, but the most interesting part is

Re: [algogeeks] Re: An interesting question

2011-03-01 Thread gaurav gupta
@pacific in your case a[0][0] might be wrong. So lets do this : a[0][0] = a[0][0 to n-1] a[1 to n-1][0] // of all elements in first row and first column for( int i=1; in; i++) { for( int j=1;jn;j++) { a[0][i] = a[j][i]; // a[0][i] contains of all elements of ith

Re: [algogeeks] Re: An interesting question

2011-02-27 Thread pacific pacific
1. do operation on all the values in each column and store it in the first row of each column 2. do operation on all the values in each row and store it in the first column of each row. (when writing at a[0][0] do operation with the value computed at 1.) 3. Now to find out the value at a[i][j]

Re: [algogeeks] Re: An interesting question

2011-02-27 Thread Mayur
If the diagonal elements of the matrix are all 0s, then you'd have to set every element in the matrix to 0 (i.e. O(N^2) operations ). I don't think, therefore, that we can do better than O(N^2). The best we can do is to perhaps, make it output sensitive. On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 6:14 PM,

[algogeeks] Re: An interesting question

2011-02-26 Thread Rajnish
1.) Traverse the whole matrix and replace each 0 value with -1. 2.) Traverse the matrix again,all the 1 values are replaced with 0 in the row and column of the index where a -1 value is found. 3.) Set all -1 values to zero and we have the output array. time complexity: O(n^2) space complexity: