[algogeeks] Re: Maximum spanning forest

2006-08-03 Thread Ioannis Atsonios
Yes you are right ,sorry..I thought something completely different..(unfortunately..:( ) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Algorithm Geeks group. To post to this group, send email to

[algogeeks] Re: Maximum spanning forest

2006-08-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I believe that your problem may be np hard ,because you may construct a polynomial reduction from maximum length path in a graph (which is NP-Complete).It is quite interesting that exists such a dichotomy between minimum vs maximum path in graph(P vs NP).Also i have an idea that you may construct

[algogeeks] Re: Maximum spanning forest

2006-08-02 Thread Siva
Max spanning forest is not NP hardu can write a simple kruskal algorithm that runs in )(E log* V) for thisas u can see it is definitely polynomial unlike longest path problem Siva --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed

[algogeeks] Re: Maximum spanning forest

2006-08-02 Thread Tosgin
Siva wrote: Max spanning forest is not NP hardu can write a simple kruskal algorithm that runs in )(E log* V) for thisas u can see it is definitely polynomial unlike longest path problem Siva Or u can write Prim's algorithm which has the same complexity. But for some graphs it has

[algogeeks] Re: Maximum spanning forest

2006-08-02 Thread hongzhi
, 2006 10:33 PM Subject: [algogeeks] Re: Maximum spanning forest Max spanning forest is not NP hardu can write a simple kruskal algorithm that runs in )(E log* V) for thisas u can see it is definitely polynomial unlike longest path problem Siva