On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 10/16/2010 03:20 PM, Anticept . wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> Use ... google DNS.
>
> So instead of "just" knowing everything you search, and all of your email,
> they also know everywhere you surf?
>
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Adam Hardy wrote:
> I have a bizarre problem with the server at 208.245.107.9, which is an
> internet broker whose server keeps disconnecting when making data requests.
> Their support is blaming the problem on me.
>
> 208.245.107.9 is used by a huge number of clie
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Anticept . wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 06:19:49AM -0400, Anticept . wrote:
>>>
>>> Fixed that symlink too, unfortunately this did not help.
>>>
>>> Module-a
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:37 PM, wrote:
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100923164127.ga5...@deeebian
&g
re other than df to find where the root fs is mounted?
>
Not sure, but if you just remember you are using sata drives, and they
show as sd[x][#]. Maybe fstab will help?
-Anticept
(if any of my information above is incorrect or misleading, please correct me!)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
what
other people have done, only worry about yourself. I don't like some
of them either, but it's not my place to judge them based on my
religion. That is reserved for the big man upstairs.
-Best regards
-Anticept
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Paul Richards wrote:
>
> Everything else like the new boot scripts, upgrade to grub2, new
> kernel, etc are working great.
>
>
> --
> Paul Richards
> @pauldoo
>
Don't forget the "aptitude purge ~c" to clean out all those leftover,
and possibly conflicting, config
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 3:21 PM, T o n g wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15:16:44 -0400, Anticept . wrote:
>
>>> I used to use either apt-get or aptitude to install packages. Is it OK
>>> to do so?
>>>
>>> I read [1] that it is not a good idea. Please co
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 3:09 PM, T o n g wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I used to use either apt-get or aptitude to install packages. Is it OK to
> do so?
>
> I read [1] that it is not a good idea.
> Please comment.
> thanks
>
> [1] http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/ubuntu-63/mixing-apt-*-and-
> aptitude-
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Jochen Schulz wrote:
>> Bob Proulx:
>> No, they couldn't. :) Windows (since at least XP) doesn't allow
>> formatting disks larger than (IIRC) 32GB with the FAT filesystem. It's
>> either NTFS or… NTFS.
>
> So... FAT32 supports up to 8T in size,
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 06:19:49AM -0400, Anticept . wrote:
>>
>> Fixed that symlink too, unfortunately this did not help.
>>
>> Module-assistant appears to be malfunctioning as well. After it fails
>> to fin
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 4:03 AM, Angus Hedger wrote:
>
> Hey there,
>
> I would check the "/lib/modules//build" symlink
>
> Make sure its pointing to "/usr/src/linux-headers-"
>
> I have had some problems with stuff not being about to find k-headers
> due to this.
>
> Regards,
>
> Angus
>
Fixed t
I'm using a custom built kernel that I've created with make-kpkg using
the debian kernel source, and I've also created and installed
kernel-source and kernel-headers with that same utility.
I need to rebuild the alsa modules to include the module called
"aloop," which isn't included in the stock k
13 matches
Mail list logo
