Mar 2018, at 21:48, Wayne Stambaugh <stambau...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Does the footprint wizard use GRID_TRICKS? In either case, we should
> roll these changes into GRID_TRICKS so it can be used everywhere we us
> boolean checkboxes in wxGrid.
> >>
> >
I actually thing that's a reasonable thing to think about supporting.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018, 19:38 Russell Oliver wrote:
> Yes, I guess so, unless there is a plan with the new schematic format to
> allow "unique/independent" symbols that include modifications from the
>
/2018 10:15 AM, Jeff Young wrote:
>>>
>>>> Oops, scratch that last one (it doesn’t even compile).
>>>>
>>>> Let’s try again:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 21 Mar 2018, at 10:59, Je
I went ahead and merged these. Thanks!
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 12:10 PM, Jeff Young <j...@rokeby.ie> wrote:
> I’ve always considered a jagged feature envelope a design bug. I’d
> support adding the via checkbox.
>
> Cheers,
> Jeff.
>
>
> On 18 Mar 2018, at 15:31,
rote:
>
> Hi Jon,
>
> Could you try this one out on Linux? (It should be active for the
> library tables, but not the footprint wizard.)
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff.
>
> <0003-Don-t-make-users-click-twice-to-toggle-a-wxGrid-chec.patch>
>
>
> On 20 Mar 2018, at 13:4
n test it. I fine with the idea even if there is a performance hit.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Wayne
>
> On 3/19/2018 10:58 PM, Jon Evans wrote:
> > I'd like some eyes on this before I push it, since it's a rather
> > significant change.
> >
> > I have added a (disabled by
Stacking up the BOARD_COMMITs was most of the problem. Thanks for the tip,
Seth!
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 9:52 AM, Jon Evans <j...@craftyjon.com> wrote:
> I will try Seth's performance idea to see if I can make a
> minimally-intrusive improvement there.
> I was proposing it as an
Thanks JP, it works for me now! Nice work!
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 1:29 PM, jp charras <jp.char...@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> Le 20/03/2018 à 15:12, Jon Evans a écrit :
> > Hi JP,
> >
> > I gave it a brief try and saw an assert problem:
> >
>
> Attached, the
ay to check them directly in the PCB.
>> Then, keep the button and save schematic with it.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Bernhard
>>
>> On 20. Mar 2018, at 18:28, Jon Evans <j...@craftyjon.com> wrote:
>>
>> Why don't you like the idea of saving the schematic
Why don't you like the idea of saving the schematic when you hit the save
button? That seems like a reasonable expected behavior to me at least.
(I dislike nag dialogs especially when they seem to have no purpose)
-Jon
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 1:26 PM, Jeff Young wrote:
> CvPcb
Hi JP,
I gave it a brief try and saw an assert problem:
Assertion failed: (aOutline.IsClosed()), function AddOutline, file
./src/kicad/common/geometry/shape_poly_set.cpp, line 429.
frame #4: 0x00010c818631
_pcbnew.kiface`SHAPE_POLY_SET::AddOutline(this=0x71d28060,
create undo entries for the DRC markers? I suspect not
> but I could be overlooking something.
>
> All that said, this is a useful addition and definitely speeds up error
> resolution on problematic boards.
>
> -S
>
> 2018-03-19 19:58 GMT-07:00 Jon Evans <j...@craftyjon.com>
I haven't started on it yet, feel free to do so if you want and have time.
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018, 09:48 Jeff Young <j...@rokeby.ie> wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> Do you want me to take this up, or are you working on it?
>
> Cheers,
> Jeff.
>
>
> On 15 Mar 2018, at 12:
a lot, but I think they would touch too much to be a part of 5.0.
Fortunately there is progress reporting on this step, so at least users
will have feedback.
-Jon
From af6e43b9f0ca47b1d52adfd3b1ae227e5b0a9a37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jon Evans <j...@craftyjon.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22
Santesteban <t...@embeblue.com>
wrote:
> I think I have it updated correctly now. There was a conflict in
> pcbnew/menubar_footprint_editor.cpp
>
> See patch attached.
>
> Simon
>
> El 19/03/2018 a las 15:28, Jon Evans escribió:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> Thanks for
I don't have a strong opinion on the functionality of this patch (I tested
it and it works as advertised) but there is one more style issue; blank
lines are needed before each if statement
Hi Simon,
Thanks for sharing your work! This sounds like a neat feature and I'd like
to test it and give feedback.
Unfortunately your patch does not apply against current master, and it
looks like it is based on an old enough point that I couldn't fix the merge
issues manually.
Could you please
I tested these patches and they work fine for me. I also think it's great
to add the via filtering checkbox, because I was just in need of that
feature on a layout a few days ago...
But I will defer to Wayne on whether or not this should go in for rc2.
-Jon
On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 12:32 PM,
Committed, thanks!
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 5:42 AM, Carsten Schoenert
wrote:
> Am 17.03.2018 um 20:21 schrieb Carsten Schoenert:
> > Is this somehow intended that these needed macros are removed in the
> > file common/dialog_about/AboutDialog_main.cpp?
> > Are there any
cause I have scripting turned off?)
>
> On 15 Mar 2018, at 01:16, Jon Evans <j...@craftyjon.com> wrote:
>
> I gave it a try and there is some strange behavior on Linux :-(
> Clicks on the checkboxes seem to sometimes get handled twice so the box
> quickly toggles between s
ter the teething troubles I
> was hesitant to merge it given possible issues on other platforms.
>
> I do think we should add (2). I'm happy for you to tackle it, Jon.
>
> (I’m also happy to merge my version to 5.0 first if others think it’s
> worth the risk.)
>
> Cheers,
>
> You can see my implementation here: https://git.launchpad.net/~
> jeyjey/kicad/commit/?h=6.0=7dda85fdae21f162bd7413fdceb16e49698f31bf.
>
> Cheers,
> Jeff.
>
>
> On 14 Mar 2018, at 13:50, Jon Evans <j...@craftyjon.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I recently
Hi all,
I recently (2f86b497) changed the behavior of the wxGrid in the footprint
wizard dialog to fix some issues with boolean (checkbox) parameters.
The default behavior from wxWidgets (at least in 3.0) is buggy in that the
update events don't get sent out when you'd expect from the
OK, Makes sense.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:25 PM, jp charras <jp.char...@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> Le 13/03/2018 à 20:47, Jon Evans a écrit :
> > I wonder if it might be a faster algorithm to calculate the perimeter
> (and holes) of zones, offset
> > it in by the zon
.fr> wrote:
> Le 13/03/2018 à 20:38, Jon Evans a écrit :
> > For the last point, you could use the approach I put in GerbView of
> start measuring the time, and
> > then throw up a progress window if the time exceeds N seconds (with a
> button to cancel the operation)
>
> happens again when
> > highlighting.
> >
> > Best-
> > Seth
>
> Trying to guess if the calculation time is long is really not easy.
>
>
> >
> > 2018-03-13 8:48 GMT-07:00 jp charras <jp.char...@wanadoo.fr jp.char...@wanadoo.fr>>:
&g
2018-03-12 15:48 GMT+01:00 Wayne Stambaugh <stambau...@gmail.com>:
>
>> On 3/12/2018 10:40 AM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
>> > On 03/12/2018 10:23 AM, Jon Evans wrote:
>> >> I have seen multiple users who run nightlies think they have RC2
>> because they read
Nice work! It may just be experimental, but it seems pretty close to a
feature for 6.0 to me :-)
I gave it a try on various boards I have worked on recently and it seems to
work as advertised and is not noticeably slower than a solid fill on my
computer.
Assuming we work out any issues related
+Michael
This looks like "clever" code so I can't tell if this is a bug or not
without running through a bunch of test cases which I'm not going to do
right now.
Do you see any issues with the operation of the code, Mark, or just the
warning?
-Jon
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 9:28 PM, Mark Roszko
That's a good point, I think we should all try to be better about assigning
ourselves to things on launchpad so that people don't accidentally work on
the same thing!
Jon
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018, 19:48 hauptmech wrote:
> Thanks, at first glance it looked like the work there
The free version is actually very complete for many use cases:
https://www.visualstudio.com/vs/compare/
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 12:36 PM, Wayne Stambaugh
wrote:
> No doubt I'm out of touch. :) It's been at least 10 years since I used
> msvs. It's great that they have
I have seen multiple users who run nightlies think they have RC2 because
they read "5.0.0-rc2" and stop reading after that :-)
Maybe we should switch the tag back to "5.0-dev" between RC releases?
I think all of us developers are going to look up the git hash anyway to
know exactly when a given
Yes, the version string was bumped to 5.0.0-rc2-dev
Maybe it would be less confusing to have it be "5.0.0-pre-rc2-dev" ?
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:02 AM, Rene Pöschl wrote:
> Hello
>
> It seems at least some packages of current nightlies report themselves as
> version
>
> Any thoughts on how you envisage this working? Text substitution through
> using escaped macros or a direct reference that can be picked via say a
> dropdown box in the dialog?
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 5:34 AM Jon Evans <j...@craftyjon.com> wrote:
>
>
Display net name of pad automatically: You can use this to auto-label test
points with the net name they are connected to, for example
Other places where text substitution is useful to me:
- Set project-level properties, like schematic title, part number,
revision, etc. Have it automatically
I have never worked on Blender but just poked around the source a bit.
They write custom modules in CPython rather than using a wrapper like SWIG.
To expose internal data, they have a Python wrapper over a C data access
API.
The C API seems to have portions that are auto-generated by the build,
I'm going to try this just to see where I get, but I'm not an expert.
One other thing that might be worth trying is to use Qt Creator to
build/debug. It can be used as a frontend for GCC/GDB and might get around
your Ctrl-C issue.
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Tomasz Wlostowski
Works for me, although your comments have tabs instead of spaces in front.
I fixed this and committed your patch. Thanks!
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 8:49 PM, hauptmech wrote:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1753330
>
> ___
>
Relating to https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1680638
I figured Wayne and perhaps some others would like to check this out before
merging to make sure it properly addresses the problem.
-Jon
From 210eae84bd55854323939f179abe2c8927fe020c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jon Evans &l
I think option A is a good feature to add across schematic and layout. A
macro substitution system for text is very handy especially as we introduce
a better object properties system.
For example, it would be nice if we could assign arbitrary properties to
the project as a whole, as well as each
Netlist export is a key feature of every schematic editor. So is
multi-sheet support. These aren't random extra features, they are a normal
part of any modern schematic editor.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018, 12:45 Ouabache Designworks wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 9:21 AM,
AYER_PADS_TH ) )
> return HIDE;
>
> Cheers,
> Andrzej
>
> W dniu 2018-03-03 o 23:39, Jon Evans pisze:
>
> Hey Andy, Andrzej,
>
> Updated patch attached, let me know if this behavior makes more sense
>
> Best,
> Jon
>
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 3:29
on that :)
>
> Don't expect miracles, but basic P footprint dragging should be in
> early V6.
>
> Tom
> >
> >> On 7 Mar 2018, at 22:20, Jon Evans <j...@craftyjon.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> As part of preparing a new
Hi all,
As part of preparing a new 6.0 roadmap, I want to make sure we have all
functionality that only exists in Legacy mode captured on Launchpad so we
don't forget about it. José just reminded me that Legacy mode in PcbNew
has some selection filtering features that don't exist in GAL, so
makes/reuse/share a lot of schematics.
>
> Am I the only one suffering from the inability to reuse schematics?
>
> my 2c
> Fabrizio
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 9:03 PM, Jon Evans <j...@craftyjon.com> wrote:
>
>> I will be sure to send a proposed update to the
ty contest.
> We have to make sensible decisions based upon project requirements and
> manpower limitations so all final decisions are made by the lead
> development team.
>
> On 3/5/2018 12:57 PM, Jon Evans wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Since my day job involves a l
In many commercial tools you can use some or another feature to mark up the
design at the schematic level with what components "go together".
Then that information is used during PCB placement, the first-pass arrange
of components when you start designing a board can place those components
1 PM, Andy Peters <de...@latke.net> wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 5, 2018, at 10:57 AM, Jon Evans <j...@craftyjon.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Since my day job involves a lot of engineering planning/timelines/etc,
> I've had this rolling around in my head...
&
Hi all,
Since my day job involves a lot of engineering planning/timelines/etc, I've
had this rolling around in my head...
I started brainstorming some proposed changes to the roadmaps.
I am using Google drive because that's what is easiest for me to play with;
I'm happy to send patches against
es to add to KiCad
> than auto-routing. If we ever get to the point we are sitting around
> twiddling our thumbs, then we should work on an auto-router.
>
> On 3/5/2018 12:16 PM, Jon Evans wrote:
> > Actually the second point in that post is a gem (rerouting of tracks
> > when you mo
Actually the second point in that post is a gem (rerouting of tracks when
you move a component) It is a feature of some super-high end packages
(Xpedition, Allegro I think) but missing from lots of paid tools (Altium,
Zuken, etc).
It's on my list of things I want to add to KiCad at some point
loop. I have some things that I definitely want
> implemented as part of this object most of which you have probably
> already run into with your connectivity work.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Wayne
>
>
> On 3/4/2018 3:07 PM, Jon Evans wrote:
> > We should probably make
I can certainly help check it. I think Wayne would have to make a call as
to whether or not it's too big a change to introduce now.
-Jon
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 7:59 AM, hauptmech wrote:
> While testing version 5 I realized that clearances are still not settable
> (like
to panning, I see almost always a small
> shift of the whole view down and then up again.
> Sometimes, but not always if you just pan left/right it will make this
> small jump downwards every time you cross center, just as if it would
> “snap" to middle position.
>
>
> On 4
Maybe I don't really understand what you mean, but I can't see any
jumpiness on Linux when panning around (with middle-mouse drag).
What do you mean by "it automatically fits to window, so there's not really
any place to go"? It does not do any kind of auto-fitting except for the
zoom-extents on
as well. I don't
> know when in the v6 cycle any of this will happen but I'm guessing it
> will happen fairly early. Tom or Orson, do either of you have any idea
> when this will happen?
>
> Wayne
>
> On 03/04/2018 02:40 PM, Jon Evans wrote:
> > FWIW, I don't find the ex
FWIW, I don't find the existing performance to be unusable, it's just not
up to the standards of PcbNew/GAL. I don't think it's worth any effort
beyond easy fixes, we should put that energy into the GAL port.
-Jon
On Sun, Mar 4, 2018, 14:34 Bernhard Stegmaier
wrote:
>
t case (disable all layers except
> Cmts.User), I am still able to select all of the invisible footprints.
> That’s not correct (IMHO).
>
> -a
>
>
>
> Andrzej
>
> W dniu 2018-03-02 o 15:42, Jon Evans pisze:
>
> Hi Andrzej,
>
> This was my intention, which is why
(to make this last point easier, you can configure git to automatically
rebase when you do `git pull` :
https://stevenharman.net/git-pull-with-automatic-rebase )
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 3:46 PM, Wayne Stambaugh
wrote:
> Jeff,
>
> On 03/02/2018 03:28 PM, Jeff Young wrote:
>
ould not be selectable.
>
> Do you still disagree with me?
>
> Andrzej
>
> W dniu 2018-03-02 o 15:42, Jon Evans pisze:
>
> Hi Andrzej,
>
> This was my intention, which is why I said I was prepared for other people
> to have other opinions :-)
>
> I think that you
Hi Andrey,
I just tried some and I didn't see a large difference in zoom behavior
between eeschema and pcbnew. They do use different zoom mechanisms when
you use Modern toolset in PcbNew, but the difference is minor.
Eeschema is not hardware-accelerated so I would expect that running it in
low
on
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 3:53 AM, Andrzej Wolski <awolski.ki...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I've tried this patch, and there is a small issue: if you have only eg
> front paste layer enabled and front pads are hidden, footprint is still
> selectable.
>
> Andrzej
>
>
> W
sorry, meant KEY_DOWN / KEY_UP, got them mixed up. Translated vs.
untranslated.
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Wayne Stambaugh <stambau...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 3/1/2018 9:28 AM, Jon Evans wrote:
> > Here's a blog post from the developers of Atom editor talking about
> >
Here's a blog post from the developers of Atom editor talking about solving
this problem:
https://blog.atom.io/2016/10/17/the-wonderful-world-of-keyboards.html
I have not studied this at all yet but perhaps it is relevant (i.e. maybe
we should be looking at EVT_CHAR too?)
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at
moved to STL so that progress
> reporting would work on Mac.
>
> As long as we don’t introduce more OpenMP into core stuff, I’m not that
> fixated on what we use for raytracing.
>
> Cheers,
> Jeff.
>
>
> On 1 Mar 2018, at 13:34, Tomasz Wlostowski <tomasz.wlostow...@cern.ch&
of any complaints in that area and even on my old HW I
> >> had never a bad experience.
> >>
> >> And then, 3D-Viewer.
> >>
> >> So, in my opinion it is basically only about 3D-Viewer… I don’t know
> >> if user experience will be that bad
Hi all,
Does anyone have a working build setup for getting OpenMP-enabled KiCad out
of MacOS?
If so, please share how -- I tried for a bit but couldn't get it going (I'm
not super familiar with the MacOS toolchain yet).
We should make sure that the 5.0 release is built with OpenMP, otherwise
our
Is *everything* slow on your Mac, or just some things?
I have a Mac that I try to test on when I can, although I do my primary
development on a Linux machine. I have tried to make sure that GerbView is
as fast on Mac OS as it is on Linux and in my testing, recent versions are
basically there.
I
:00 2001
From: Jon Evans <j...@craftyjon.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 22:17:42 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] GerbView: More accurate selection of arc shapes
---
gerbview/gerber_draw_item.cpp | 37 -
include/trigo.h | 10 ++
2 files chang
Hi all,
Attached are three patches to fix a few issues noted by JP and Clemens.
These need to be applied after my patches from yesterday which are not yet
merged.
Best,
Jon
From 0d0a6cb24f14e3da98d7d941a7a4cf96dcab8e12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jon Evans <j...@craftyjon.com>
Date: T
It's certainly fine, but if you have time to report them on Launchpad too
it makes sure we don't let them slip through the cracks!
Thanks
-Jon
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Clemens Koller wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I hope you don't mind feeding you with more bug reports... ;-)
>
> In
Yes I have seen the weird circles, I think it exists in 4.0.7 as well.
I can look in to the menu bars getting messed up.
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 4:09 PM, Clemens Koller wrote:
> Attached is a small Gerber file + Screenshot.
> When displaying it in Legacy Toolset (only), at
Have you tried my patch from last night that re-does the sorting code?
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 2:29 PM, jp charras <jp.char...@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> Le 27/02/2018 à 20:09, jp charras a écrit :
> > Le 27/02/2018 à 15:33, Jon Evans a écrit :
> >> This is so strange. I ju
Thanks JP!
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 2:09 PM, jp charras <jp.char...@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> Le 27/02/2018 à 15:33, Jon Evans a écrit :
> > This is so strange. I just installed the nightly build on a Windows
> machine just to see if this is
> > a Windows specific proble
p.char...@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> Le 27/02/2018 à 03:17, Jon Evans a écrit :
> > Clemens, I still can't reproduce this.
> > Can anyone else reproduce the layer manager in GerbView getting out of
> sync with the loaded files?
>
> Yes, I can easily reproduce it ( OpenGL engine
-Jon
From c6346d1042965957ff34baf514e4bea79776eca2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jon Evans <j...@craftyjon.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 22:06:31 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Rework footprint selection filtering to improve behavior
Fixes: lp:1751960
* https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1751960
---
pcbnew/
Re-sending these since they may have gotten lost in the other thread.
These fix some bugs Andy Peters found on GerbView MacOS.
-Jon
0001-Fix-edge-case-GERBER_FILE_IMAGE-creation-logic.patch
Description: Binary data
0001-Use-proper-path-when-loading-files-from-Gerber-job-f (1).patch
In the case that there is a separate installer for the libraries (which I
also think makes sense), maybe those line items should be removed from the
main installer instead of just disabled (if that is easy) to reduce
confusion?
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Wayne Stambaugh
rom kicad or stand alone mode.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> Wayne
> >>>
> >>> On 2/26/2018 5:01 AM, Maciej Sumiński wrote:
> >>>> Jon,
> >>>>
> >>>> With this patch applied, any laye
> attached address sanitizer report for details.
>
> Regards,
> Orson
>
> On 02/25/2018 10:01 PM, Jon Evans wrote:
> > This patch uses simple iteration instead of the RTREE search to update
> the
> > layer order and color in VIEW. On my Linux system, this results in a
To be honest I'm not sure I think those options should even be in the
context menu, especially when you have selected an item. They are already
on the toolbar and have hotkeys.
But maybe some people use them and would be sad if we removed them :)
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 9:27 PM, Andrey Kuznetsov
OK, got the crash bug too.
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 8:12 PM, Jon Evans <j...@craftyjon.com> wrote:
> I'm still trying to debug the crash, but the attached patch should fix the
> files not found issue.
>
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 7:16 PM, Andy Peters <de...@latke.net> wro
I'm still trying to debug the crash, but the attached patch should fix the
files not found issue.
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 7:16 PM, Andy Peters <de...@latke.net> wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 25, 2018, at 5:11 PM, Jon Evans <j...@craftyjon.com> wrote:
>
> Hmm, can't reproduce
And one final performance patch for now
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 6:56 PM, Jon Evans <j...@craftyjon.com> wrote:
> One more performance optimization attached
>
> Clemens -- are you talking to me directly? For most of my smaller fixes I
> do not push them to anywhere public befo
> >
> > On 02/25/2018 03:14 PM, Jon Evans wrote:
> >> These patches improves redraw performance when toggling sketch/filled
> >> draw modes.
> >>
> >> On Linux at least, the difference is quite noticeable on complicated
> >> Gerber files.
>
Hmm, can't reproduce on Linux (when loading job file, it successfully finds
the Gerbers in the same directory as the job file)
Do you have the ability to build a debug build and get a stack trace of the
crash?
-Jon
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 7:02 PM, Andy Peters wrote:
> On
irectory by File - Load Gerber File... - Shift-Clicking
> on the files in the order I want to load them - Open.
>
> (I need to click #no of file times to dismiss the warning dialog box
> because of the proprietary format "%FSDAX33Y33*%", which is annoying, btw.)
>
> Regards,
&
Fixes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1751646
From e648158336af3f90c41bf17a9a2b387b5b095191 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jon Evans <j...@craftyjon.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 18:17:59 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Ensure ROUTER_PREVIEW_ITEM draws on top of all normal layers
Fixes: lp:1
Hi Clemens, do these files have Gerber X2 attributes? What process did you
use to load them? (i.e. did you load one at a time; use a Gerber job file,
load them all at once, etc)?
Thanks,
Jon
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 6:15 PM, Clemens Koller wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am not absolutely
One more performance patch for GerbView attached
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 3:14 PM, Jon Evans <j...@craftyjon.com> wrote:
> These patches improves redraw performance when toggling sketch/filled draw
> modes.
>
> On Linux at least, the difference is quite noticeable on complica
number of items in the view).
-Jon
From a7bda21efef9ca6eee250ea3ce420d058b3cf354 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jon Evans <j...@craftyjon.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 15:38:05 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Don't use the RTREE in UpdateAllLayersOrder() /
UpdateAllLayersColor()
Since we are going to i
These patches improves redraw performance when toggling sketch/filled draw
modes.
On Linux at least, the difference is quite noticeable on complicated Gerber
files.
-Jon
From 04cb51708ff6f46773b3f1acad2b8b8e9adf2db6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jon Evans <j...@craftyjon.com>
Date: Sun,
Fixes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1751589
From c8e31559693753a6fd9cfaab29c5d77e01122a7b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jon Evans <j...@craftyjon.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 12:52:52 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Refactor post-load actions in PcbNew and apply them
consistently
Fix
in GerbView.
-Jon
From 47b143f347d55c7608afd8aba087ed324cfb74da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jon Evans <j...@craftyjon.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 12:38:35 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Fix regression in GerbView display settings; some
optimization too
---
common/view/view.cpp
I would also recommend keeping 5.0 in master (and just use tags for the
RCs) to keep things simpler. I think we don't have enough committers and QA
process to handle two parallel branches. Like Jeff said, anyone working on
6.0 stuff can just keep it in a private branch a little longer.
-Jon
On
e:
> >
> > There is no plan yet but it has been discussed. The only downside is
> that we will have to write our own print handling on windows and I'm
> guessing macos. That's one of the reasons no one has signed up yet because
> it will be a large undertaking.
> >
&
> W dniu 2018-02-24 o 19:24, Jon Evans pisze:
>
> Yeah, there (at least) three different dialogs that all present similar
> things (i.e. a list of layers to include, settings, etc):
>
> Export->SVG
> Print
> Plot
>
> The Print code for Export->SVG seems to just
ot
> code while the later goes through the Print code.
>
> Do we need both? I haven’t a clue.
>
> It would be nice to clean this stuff up, if there is in fact a clean way
> to present it.
>
> Cheers,
> Jeff.
>
>
> On 24 Feb 2018, at 14:54, Jon Evans <j...@craf
All set. Included here for reference
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 1:09 PM, Jeff Young <j...@rokeby.ie> wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> Cool. You want to attach that one to the bug?
>
> Cheers,
> Jeff.
>
>
> On 24 Feb 2018, at 17:55, Jon Evans <j...@craftyjon.com> w
i Jon,
>
> Thanks for looking into this, but the second one will kill performance.
> I’ve got a slightly different one baking….
>
> Cheers,
> Jeff.
>
>
> On 24 Feb 2018, at 17:18, Jon Evans <j...@craftyjon.com> wrote:
>
> See: https://bugs.launchpad.net/
501 - 600 of 1077 matches
Mail list logo