Utreexo only seems to save us time if it is used in "bridge" mode otherwise it
takes soft fork for all nodes to use Utreexo at the price of larger transaction.
The problem is not here for the moment, it is imperative to solve the problem
of inscription that quickly brings us closer to the need
Hi, delighted to see an implementation of Utreexo.
I will just have a few questions about your implementation.
1) Is this implementation able to start other nodes whether they are on the
reference implementation or on Floresta?
2) Is it possible to switch from Bitcoin Core to Floresta without
I understand your point of view. However, inscription represent by far the
largest spam attack due to their ability to embed themselves in the witness
with a fee reduction.
Unlike other methods, such as using the op_return field which could also be
used to spam the chain, the associated fees
Hello,
I am writing to you today because I am concerned about a significant bug that
seems to be overlooked in recent versions of the software. The bug in question
concerns the "inscriptions" developed by @rodarmor, and it worries me because,
in just a few months, they have already reached a
