Just throwing it in here while commuting, so it's a top-post with no
references. Saw it yesterday on reddit (!!! Reddit being useful for once
!!!): $callback = |$x| => $x ** 2;
On 31 Jan 2017 22:44, "Bob Weinand" wrote:
>
> > Am 31.01.2017 um 19:41 schrieb Christoph M. Becker :
> >
> > On 31.01.
On 1 Feb 2017 12:27 a.m., "Christoph M. Becker" wrote:
On 31.01.2017 at 21:47, Levi Morrison wrote:
>> Is there anything else that I am missing?
>
> Sadly, yes. Consider the following snippet:
>
> class A {
> function method(): B;
> }
>
> class B extends A {
> functio
It's still working, but moderation is kinda meh, so there's loads of spam
posts by bots :-(
I would suggest posting questions directly on Github for easier
cross-referencing and discoverability.
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On Mon, Jan 30, 20
INTERVAL 1 WEEK doesn't parse in DQL. See
https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/blob/b181228d69a78372693ee0f3dd2285e0e3771bca/lib/Doctrine/ORM/Query/AST/Functions/DateAddFunction.php#L28
Also, please note that you just select `a`, not `a.*`.
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
` "[Syntax Error] line 0, col 134`
Please provide:
* your DQL
* your expected SQL
Also, I would strongly suggest to write an integration test relying on the
DQL parser ;-)
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Abir B
Also: copying the method is perfectly OK :-)
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Peter Bowyer
wrote:
> Thanks Marco.
>
> Peter
>
> On Thursday, 19 January 2017 11:58:40 UTC, Marco Pivetta wrote:
>>
&g
The correct approach would be to extract the method into either:
* a static utility
* an injected dependency
Reuse through `protected` only leads to a massive amount of coupling, and
more BC concerns for us.
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On Thu, Jan
> Any suggestions are highly welcome. Thank you.
>
> Regards,
> Tim
This looks much better than the initial proposal, thanks!
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Stanislav Malyshev
wrote:
> What prevents you from being able to create proper issues on bugs.php.net?
>
Nothing: it's just a forgotten corner of the web, like our Jira was.
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
tands, I only go to bugs.php.net to create a github issue
where I link it as reference.
Just my 2 cents.
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
ts()` to skip tests, run tests, load
polyfills, etc.
My best guess is that the API shouldn't change though. That's the safest BC
approach, whereas new behavior can be defined with a completely new
function (for example: `property_is_statically_defined()`,
`property_value_is_assigned()`, etc.).
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Michał Brzuchalski
wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
> 2017-01-16 0:27 GMT+01:00 Marco Pivetta :
>
>> Hi Wes,
>>
>> This has been discussed before, and it's currently used to intercept
>> access
>> to properties. Since we
Almost forgot: these examples apply also to private and protected
properties. That's currently the only way to make the behavior consistent
across friend objects (same scope).
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:27 AM, Marco Pivetta wrote:
> Hi Wes,
>
> This has been discussed before, and
set_properties.phpt
We can most probably get rid of this weird behavior once property accessors
are in the language.
Greets,
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:20 AM, Wes wrote:
> Hello elephpants.
>
> Currently PHP allow
This is currently not supported by the EventManager, as our implementation
is simplistic for performance reasons. Still, it is achieved anyway by
registering the listeners in the correct order.
On 13 Jan 2017 9:09 p.m., "Guite" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I want to know whether and how it is possible t
; Tim
>
> > On 12 Jan 2017, at 22:39, Fleshgrinder wrote:
> >
> > On 1/12/2017 10:13 PM, Marco Pivetta wrote:
> >> Hey Richard,
> >>
> >> I made an example where everything was in a single class, but most
> >> scenarios involve a lazy-loadi
Hey Richard,
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:58 PM, Fleshgrinder wrote:
> On 1/12/2017 9:35 PM, Marco Pivetta wrote:
> > Heya,
> >
> > While I agree that it is weird to be able to call constructors more than
> > once, this is generally used for:
> >
> >
ass (and I generally advise against doing that anyway).
Therefore I don't see a reason to drop manual constructor calls, unless
there is a strong necessity to get rid of 'em.
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 8:11 AM, Tim Bez
rging duplicate keys should be part of the function
name, or a parameter (the former being better, having a strict version that
fails, and a merging version that overwrites)
* I totally forgot that I benchmarked this before :-\
https://github.com/Ocramius/array_change_keys-benchmark
Marco Pivetta
On 6 Jan 2017 18:27, "Wes" wrote:
Hi Marco \o,
linking to the discussion thread http://externals.io/thread/573 because I
don't have much more to add.
I think the throwable's code is almost never used regardless, but this
could give users more opportunities to do something useful with it as
Nikl
at just defines an accessor for that new context information.
Greets,
Marco Pivetta
dn't use nor try this
extension so far.
IMO needs another few design iterations, and a lot more adoption, in order
to become interesting. Or you provide us with a factory for an
implementation of these concepts that already has adoption, traction and
extremely careful design behind it.
Greets,
Marco Pivetta
sions in https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/issues/2237
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Lukas Hofer wrote:
> Hi! I have the following structure of entities: Customer is the parent
> class and it has two subclasses -
ct('ANY_VALUE(d.id), d.nom, count(d.nom) as lignes');
> $qb->groupBy('d.nom');
> $qb->orderBy('d.nom');
>
> But doctrine don't recognize this function
>
> [2/2] QueryException: [Syntax Error] line 0, col 7: Error: Expected known
> function, g
omething that opcache could do anyway.
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
t my 2 cents:
Too much magic syntactic sugar, whereas you are just saving very little
time while implementing a few method stubs that take..
Yet, in order to achieve that, you added a huge amount of complexity for
all the tooling that relies on the AST, including PHP itself.
.
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
1. Stefano Torresi
2. Lukas Kahwe Smith
3. Gary Hockin
4. David Négrier
5. Samantha Quiñones
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PHP
Framework Interoperability Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
m doesn't enforce it doesn't mean that we
should blindly allow everything everywhere, as that removes any sort of
guarantees on contracts, making it impossible to reason about what the code
will do.
But if you think it'll be necessary I'll require 2/3 of the votes.
>
Fix one library or fix all of them: good luck with the second one. 😉
Anyway, the type change (on the property, in this case) can be applied to
any interface change reducing return type strictness: it is a BC break.
On 18 Dec 2016 11:47 a.m., "Wes" wrote:
> Yo, Marco :P I don't need to add any c
Looks like a step backwards to me. In fact, I just had issues with code (in
zendframework https://github.com/zendframework/zend-servicemanager/pull/167)
that assumed integer error codes, but then failed because PDO failed to
adhere to the property specification (PDO needs fixing here, not the other
See https://secure.php.net/supported-versions.php
On 14 Dec 2016 9:29 p.m., "Dennis Clarke" wrote:
>
>
>>
>> PHP 5.6 isn't EOL for a further two years, you should be fine.
>>
>>
> Thank you so much. I can only guess this is posted on a "lifetime" page
> somewhere on php.net but I didn't see it.
Hi Carlos,
Can you please show what you've attempted so far?
Also, please try to keep messages in English, as that's the language for
this mailing list.
Greets,
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
2016-12-14 19:22 GMT+01:00 Werliton Carlos :
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
> Thank you for explaining the reason why!
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Marco Pivetta wrote:
> > I voted "no" because I don't see any advantage over using a custom
> session
> &g
on save handler decorator instead.
Greets,
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:44 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This RFC exposes session serializer interface to user space. It works
> like user defined session save han
We need to release an ORM version supporting common 2.7. for now, you can
use composer's `AS` dependency require workaround.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"doctrine-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
This looks awesome to me: nicely cleaned up! 👍
On 23 Nov 2016 01:52, "Dan Ackroyd" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the reintroduction of the Object Type RFC for discussion.
>
> There was previously strong feedback from people who would prefer that
> the inheritance checks for methods that use object ty
of the current open-source libs out there are trying to push for
SemVer - having PHP not following that seems like a huge mess to me.
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
One question then: why?
Working userland impl, just use it.
On 16 Nov 2016 16:01, "Aaron Lewis" wrote:
> Thanks Marco.
>
> But I'm looking for the C implementation ..
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Marco Pivetta wrote:
> > Maybe something like ht
Maybe something like https://github.com/guzzle/psr7/blob/master/README.md?
There are additional middlewares that can extract from a request and
populate super-globals for legacy app support purposes.
On 16 Nov 2016 11:50, "Aaron Lewis" wrote:
> I have a file that contains a HTTP request,
>
> ```
11:52, "Maksim Borisov" wrote:
> Thank you, Marco.
>
> Can you help newbie to send feature request to doctrine-team for that
> case? How can I do it?
>
> четверг, 27 октября 2016 г., 7:14:17 UTC+7 пользователь Marco Pivetta
> написал:
>>
>> That's an ORM li
That's an ORM limitation that you are hitting. The ORM doesn't really know
(yet? nobody working on this, so far) how to deal with multiple levels of
identity indirection, at the moment.
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016
rics, but that's not viable for now.
This additional type hint is pretty much covering the scenarios above in a
very approachable way.
Greets,
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:39 AM, Michał Brzuchalski wrote:
> Hi all,
&
; --
> Dave
>
Like with any software rewrite project, remember that software rewrites
usually fail.
It's probably better to deprecate the function, make a new one, then code
the newer implementation there, and let users migrate.
This is necessary to mitigate the risk of BC breaks.
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
is patch from PHP 7.0 branch, then discuss what
> the default should be.
>
> Any comments?
> If there is no objections, I'll apply this few days later.
>
If you need comments on a patch, send a PR?
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
esolved from my perspective, and some sort of
soft-deprecation was introduced (deprecated, but no deprecation notice
triggered).
Nicolas, can you confirm if this works on your side?
Greets,
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
/Functional/Ticket/DDC992Test.php,
for example (just adapted to your scenario).
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Janelle Tavares wrote:
> I believe that I found a bug in the latest version of
> AssignedGenerat
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 9:22 AM, 'Dominik Echterbruch' via doctrine-user <
doctrine-user@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Thanks Marco.
>
> On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 11:57:13 PM UTC+2, Marco Pivetta wrote:
>>
>> Doctrine does not (and will not) support DE
entity's constructor
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:16 PM, 'Dominik Echterbruch' via doctrine-user <
doctrine-user@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I wonder if there is a possibility to rem
Hey Paul,
On 26 Sep 2016 21:38, "Paul Jones" wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> tl;dr: Gauging interest in an extension for server-side PHP request and
response objects (*not* HTTP messages per se; see below) prior to writing
an RFC for them on the wiki.
>
> * * *
>
> From time to time we've all heard the co
, let alone the precise semantic behaviour'.
And I'd also add: some libraries are doing amazing AOP things with this.
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
a string with more meaning seems like the correct way
to go forward on this, making it die with 8.0.
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
It's a point release, it's not really "up for decision" whether BC can be
broken or not on functionality that is working as intended (unless I
misunderstand the release process).
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On Wed, Sep 21, 2
That still means that code designed for 7.0 will break while reflecting 7.0
code (`= null` scenario) when run on 7.1, effectively preventing upgrade,
Niklas.
On 21 Sep 2016 15:27, "Niklas Keller" wrote:
> 2016-09-21 15:14 GMT+02:00 Nikita Popov :
>
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Nicolas G
You shouldn't have two ways of mapping an association inside a single
entity.
Either use objects, or use identifiers (and don't use lazy-loading then).
Also, you can always get a reference, if you know that the foreign key is
valid, via $product = $em->getReference(Product::clas
There's a metadata grapher in DocrtineORMmodule, but it's not really a GUI.
On 20 Sep 2016 16:52, "João Dalben" wrote:
> Hello, I was wondering if there is a free software alternative to Skipper (
> https://www.skipper18.com/) to generate Doctrine 2 annotations? Even if
> it paid, I'm concerned
ubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
Full ACK on what Kazuo said.
I use `uniqid()` daily in my test suites, even new ones (not much else),
and introducing the `.` everywhere will just cause issues.
Changing string length may also break everything.
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
mutable hidden state! */ }
}
Requiring immutable values in consumers will likely improve code
quality/safety and reduce dangerous assumptions, and it will probably also
allow for optimizations in the engine later on.
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
Seems like an autoloading issue. Not related to doctrine, but to
https://github.com/zendframework/ZendDeveloperTools
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Nikhil Dhar wrote:
> Hey I am new in this please find the be
What's `get_class($token)` (before serialization)?
What does that class look like? What do the ancestors of it look like?
Is the data serialized and unserialized in the same system?
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:16 PM, T
of the line.)
>
> --
> Bob Williams
>
Yeah, and I would question:
1. why are you editing with a plaintext editor and searching stuff like
that? Are you in a super-hurry? Seems like a 0.001% scenario
2. why do you need to search for functions in a class? Just what kind of
monstrou
Ah, thanks, I thought it was silently passing :-)
On 31 Aug 2016 12:10 p.m., "Dmitry Stogov" wrote:
> no. if you would try the proposed PR with this code, you would see:
>
>
> Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Unsupported operand types
>
> ------
Hi Dmitry,
On 31 Aug 2016 8:37 a.m., "Dmitry Stogov" wrote:
>
> I vote NO, because the implementation introduces more problems than
intents to fix.
>
> For example the following code starts to throw exception:
>
>
>
Isn't that the point of this RFC?
I would expect this code to only ever work by
Are you looking for https://filp.github.io/whoops/ ?
On 28 Aug 2016 5:29 a.m., "Rene Veerman"
wrote:
> eh oops, this would've maybe been easier, and allows me to update these
> sources in the future if and when needed..
>
> https://github.com/seductiveapps/webappObfuscator/blob/master/
> webappO
ath, exactly like we'll have to do
with the OSS libs.
That said, I'm muting the thread: I'm basically wasting time with this,
apparently.
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Levi Morrison wrote:
> The issue h
Hi Dan,
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
> On 21 August 2016 at 17:01, Marco Pivetta wrote:
> > Yes, but the __toString API is used for codegen, and current code
> > generators don't expect a `?` to appear there.
>
> And they will continue to not
Yes, but the __toString API is used for codegen, and current code
generators don't expect a `?` to appear there.
How many engineers and failing unit tests does it take to explain a BC
break?
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 6:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Levi Morrison wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Marco Pivetta wrote:
>
>> Including the question mark still breaks code-gen based on simple
>> nullable types. PHP 7.0.x-compliant code will do following:
>>
>> -
f the many libraries
involved.
The new API already includes `ReflectionType#allowsNull()`, so that's
sufficient to build forward-compliant codegen. Breaking BC is a no-go
though.
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Lev
as simple, BC break and clear lack of
> consensus the change is still not reverted?
I explicitly asked Aaron to wait for me to check out things today.
Indeed, it is a mess, but it would probably already have been reverted if
we managed to verify the issues earlier on. :-)
Marco Pivetta
page where we can see the current state of the `ReflectionType` API
(and its subtypes) would be golden.
* `ReflectionType#__toString()` seems to crash in very interesting ways
when `?string` is reflected (see issue above - couldn't isolate precisely)
Cheers,
Marco Pivetta
http://twitt
Foo", "bar"))->getReturnType());'
object(ReflectionNamedType)#2 (0) {
}
Was there a newer RFC that I missed?
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Marco Pivetta wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Aaron Piot
everting.
We were hoping to look into it today, but it seems like beta3 hit us before
we got there :-D
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Davey Shafik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> PHP 7.1.0beta3 was just released and can be dow
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Aaron Piotrowski wrote:
>
> > On Aug 17, 2016, at 12:02 PM, Marco Pivetta wrote:
> >
> > That would have been a headache anyway. We saw it coming, and it will be
> fixed on our end, but please don't try to outsmart it.
> > I k
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Aaron Piotrowski wrote:
>
> > On Aug 17, 2016, at 11:45 AM, Marco Pivetta wrote:
> >
> > Since scalar types are invalid anyway if prepended with `\`, I see no
> point
> > in producing a string with the `\` in it.
> >
> >
).
This is not being really helpful, as it is.
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Aaron Piotrowski wrote:
> Marco,
>
> > On Aug 17, 2016, at 11:22 AM, Marco Pivetta ocram...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
>
always dealing with the base
namespace.
Seems unnecessary and causes a lot of headaches, instead of actually
simplifying things.
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Aaron Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I recently made som
Not for join tables, sorry.
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Łukasz Strzyżowski
wrote:
> I have an association like below:
>
> /**
> * @var Worker
> *
> * @ORM\ManyToMany(targetEntity
You probably created proxies with one user, then tried to overwrite them
with a different user.
In general, at least for prod environments, you should ship with
pre-generated proxy classes.
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 7:50 PM
Works for me 👍
On 15 Aug 2016 10:17 p.m., "Dan Ackroyd" wrote:
> On 14 August 2016 at 19:01, Marco Pivetta wrote:
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > This is a SemVer violation, but it doesn't seem like PHP follows SemVer
> > closely, so I'm a bit confused about
Hey Yasuo,
Besides what reported above by Dan, my reasoning for voting "no" is that
this API can be implemented in userland, regardless if trivial or not
There is no reason good enough for justifying yet another added endpoint
that can even be implemented with simple function composition.
In add
Hey Stas
On 15 Aug 2016 00:35, "Stanislav Malyshev" wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> > A realization that needs to be made is that beginners would be using
> > libraries that requires to make valid restrictions, preventing those
> > beginners to mess up with code they shouldn't. So even if the use case
> > is
Hey Tony,
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Tony Marston
wrote:
> "Marco Pivetta" wrote in message news:CADyq6sKZRBvYFtqyKYVYM4iU
> ex+2ouujvhep1jznm56k3+h...@mail.gmail.com...
>
>>
>> So much confusion...
>>
>> There are 3 (or more) types of
een passed to
`get_class()` was a bug, in my work context, so I'm really happy to see
this patch going in.
Still, can any of the release managers throw their opinion at the RFC?
This is a SemVer violation, but it doesn't seem like PHP follows SemVer
closely, so I'm a bit confus
r data-integrity and correctness of a
value at every layer of your architecture.
Add `__toString` to them and they even behave like they did before
(strings).
On 13 Aug 2016 19:02, "Lester Caine" wrote:
On 13/08/16 14:43, Marco Pivetta wrote:
> It receives a value (nested, if necessar
So much confusion...
There are 3 (or more) types of validation in pretty much every web-app, so
let's please stop calling it simply "validation".
1. frontend validation (unsafe/unreliable), prevents invalid data
submission, makes things friendlier for the user
2. form validation, in the applicati
Hey Yasuo,
Something is weird with the voting form, can you check it?
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This RFC is to add session_gc() function.
>
> session_gc() function
ning for voting "no".
Cheers,
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is RFC for adding session_create_id() function.
>
> Session ID string uses special binary to
influential projects, such as PHPUnit, for
example, already shut down their PEAR repository ages ago.
Heck, this is from 2014:
http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=140056783816305&w=2
Cheers,
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 4:
We don't support PEAR anymore
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 4:11 PM, barryo wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> is PEAR still supported for ORM 2.3?
>
> Looks like the domain is not resolving:
>
> $ dig +short ns d
Usually, RDBMs are a poor fit as k/v cache.
On 2 Aug 2016 7:58 a.m., "Nima Sadjadi" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What about this? Would consider to add?
>
> https://github.com/doctrine/cache/issues/175
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "doctrine
ns for that.
The proposed solution is a solution, but not for this problem, in my
opinion.
Greets,
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
not a global
registry.
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Michael Vostrikov <
michael.vostri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Personally I don't know any developer who is using raw php in project
> without templ
Jira was completely removed from the website, as we moved all issues to
github.
Consider editing
https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/blob/master/docs/en/index.rst and
sending us a patch (can do directly from the interface)
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com
;t do transactional DDL, so you
might be in some sort of limbo (neither pre- nor post- migration status)
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On 12 July 2016 at 10:27, wrote:
> Yeah, soory I forget to iclude the schema:
>
> CREATE TABLE `customer` (
&g
Not sure what is being asked: we don't know what your schema looks like
before generating the migration...
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On 12 July 2016 at 10:21, wrote:
> I'm getting this error when executing doctrine:migrations:diff
&g
I linked the source file:
https://github.com/doctrine/doctrine2/blob/master/docs/en/tutorials/getting-started.rst
The docs are part of the doctrine2 sources. They get converted into
website-version every once in a while.
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On
rine2/blob/44feacd32764207e2394d9f42e1de57f3571b79d/lib/Doctrine/ORM/Tools/Console/ConsoleRunner.php#L41
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On 12 July 2016 at 07:27, Doctrinator wrote:
>
> https://doctrine-orm.readthedocs.io/en/latest/tutorials/getting-started.html#generating-the-database-sc
Could you link the examples where you grabbed this from?
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On 12 July 2016 at 07:00, Doctrinator wrote:
> Hi Marco and others,
>
> There are differences between the tutorial's code and what's in GitHub.
That seems good to me :-)
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On 12 July 2016 at 06:40, Doctrinator wrote:
> Thanks Marco! That makes a lot of sense.
>
> I'll be happy to do a PR, but perhaps getting the wording right here will
> be easie
ly.
Hope that clarifies it. Please remember to edit the text on the
documentation, if this was helpful and you now understand what is going on
:-)
Marco Pivetta
http://twitter.com/Ocramius
http://ocramius.github.com/
On 12 July 2016 at 02:20, Greg Bell wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Looki
501 - 600 of 1822 matches
Mail list logo
