Size-based benefit analysis here:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2024-May/043006.html
** Summary changed:
- Packages file contains extra uinnecessary hashes
+ Packages file contains extra unnecessary hashes
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Public bug reported:
Packages files (eg.
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/jammy/main/binary-
amd64/Packages.xz) contain hashes using MD5sum, SHA1, SHA256 and SHA512,
but if we deprecate the older ones and leave only SHA512 (for example),
then we get a 30% or so size saving, reducing the
On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 06:23:05PM +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> If we want to make apt update quicker / lighter on resources we should
> figure out if we can stop publishing some of the hashes (which entirely
> dominate the size of the compressed package lists). We currently have 4
>
On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 08:43:11AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On Debian I have seen apt-update downloading diff files. Why don't we use
> those for Ubuntu especially for the large files like Contents?
This would require implementation inside Launchpad I think, which
presumably should
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 03:11:18PM +0200, Marco Trevisan wrote:
> In the past [1] I was suggesting something similar, and IMHO it would be
> quite useful for having better SRU testing tooling too.
>
> It's true that using `apt -t *-proposed` would work well for testing,
> but I was wondering if
On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 07:23:09AM -0400, David A. Desrosiers wrote:
> Let's also not lose sight of the fact that if proposed had been enabled by
> default with the current LTS release, the xz exposure and impact would have
> been a lot broader than it was, and also a lot harder to clean up and
>
The verification of the Stable Release Update for far2l has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
Hello Erich, or anyone else affected,
Accepted easyeffects into noble-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/easyeffects/7.1.6-1ubuntu0.24.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Thank you for your reply. Unfortunately this doesn't address my concerns
though. Please address paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 from my comment 7 above.
Depending on your answer, it may be the case that I end up rejecting the
SRU because the impact is not sufficient to justify one (see:
Thank you for the discussion. My reaction was the same as Andreas', but
with the alternatives having been considered, if you still want to make
this change then I guess it's fine to defer to you to make the call as
you're driving this and the various options all seem reasonable to me.
The change
The terms of three seats on the Development Membership Board have
recently expired and are being temporarily extended by the Technical
Board. The terms of the remaining four seats expire on 16 June. This is
a call for nominations to fill all seven seats.
The DMB is responsible for reviewing and
I spoke to Andreas and Renan about this bug just now. I'm told that 32.2
in proposed passes all verification tests against the exceptional test
plan except for this bug. But we also need this bug fixed and don't want
to have to wait for the additional time a full test rerun would take
along with a
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
It isn't obvious to me what Ubuntu might be "doing wrong", if anything,
that is causing this issue. Xen in Ubuntu is in our universe component
and community-supported only. Therefore I don't expect this bug to
** Description changed:
- I understand that, when informing me about notifications, update-
- notifier will tell me about Pro-only updates that I cannot receive
- unless I subscribe to Pro.
+ I understand that, when informing me about updates, update-notifier will
+ tell me about Pro-only updates
Steve asked for this to be Critical and assigned to Simon.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065863
Title:
needrestart causes kernel upgrade messages in motd
To manage notifications
Public bug reported:
On Noble, I see this in my motd:
*** System restart required ***
Pending kernel upgrade!
Running kernel version:
6.8.0-22-generic
Diagnostics:
The currently running kernel version is not the expected kernel version
6.8.0-31-generic.
I found this code in needrestart:
This doesn't seem like a duplicate to me?
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 2051115
ubuntu pro integration interferes with dist-upgrade prompting
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
On Sat, May 04, 2024 at 02:08:16AM +, Seth Arnold wrote:
> But, I also expect very few of our users would use -proposed. What
> percentage do you expect? I'm guessing less than 1%.
I agree. But making it easier to test proposed for that tiny percentage
of users would benefit all users[1] in
On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 04:05:31PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> Often I see apt-get update downloads exceeding 100 MiB. That is without a
> single package download.
I think it might be worth quantifying this. Right now, for amd64
proposed pocket Packages.xz files for the following:
Jammy:
This should be Fix Released for the development release, right?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to intel-gpu-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061324
Title:
Error when re-building package from source
This should be Fix Released for the development release, right?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to intel-gpu-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061324
Title:
Error when re-building package from source
To manage
OK, thanks. I guess we can review the Jammy upload for now then on the
assumption that the Mantic upload won't have substantial changes until
it arrives in the queue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
OK, thanks. I guess we can review the Jammy upload for now then on the
assumption that the Mantic upload won't have substantial changes until
it arrives in the queue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to adsys in Ubuntu.
This should be Fix Released for the development release, right?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061324
Title:
Error when re-building package from source
To manage notifications
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 02:15:59AM -0800, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> I'd like to suggest that we start setting NotAutomatic: yes for the
> proposed pocket with hirsute+1, such that things like SRU verification
> will be easier, and all those people who enable proposed in sources.list
> for I
I wondered if ucf is expected to handle dpkg-divert -ed files in the
first place, since that seemed odd to me. It does seem like that's a
feature the code was intended to support, although it's unclear to me if
it ever worked, and it's not really documented anywhere I can find
except that is
> * run update-maintainer script
FWIW, it's not necessary to mention this directly. It is correct to do
it, but convention is to skip mentioning it in the changelog because
otherwise we'd have to unnecessarily mention it on nearly every Ubuntu
upload.
--
You received this bug notification
> * run update-maintainer script
FWIW, it's not necessary to mention this directly. It is correct to do
it, but convention is to skip mentioning it in the changelog because
otherwise we'd have to unnecessarily mention it on nearly every Ubuntu
upload.
--
You received this bug notification
I wondered if ucf is expected to handle dpkg-divert -ed files in the
first place, since that seemed odd to me. It does seem like that's a
feature the code was intended to support, although it's unclear to me if
it ever worked, and it's not really documented anywhere I can find
except that is
Debian is behind and the server team is upstream, so there is no work to
do on this package.
There is a delta introduced in Ubuntu, but no need to merge it upstream
right now as there wouldn't be any user-facing benefit to that. We can
catch up when there is user-facing benefit work to do.
**
There is currently no newer Debian version.
** Changed in: mosh (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064428
Title:
Merge mosh from Debian
Currently the version of adsys in Mantic is 0.13.1ubuntu0.1, which is
lower than the version in Jammy Unapproved. What's your plan for Mantic
and/or users upgrading to Mantic please?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to adsys
Currently the version of adsys in Mantic is 0.13.1ubuntu0.1, which is
lower than the version in Jammy Unapproved. What's your plan for Mantic
and/or users upgrading to Mantic please?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hello Leonardo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted intel-gpu-tools into mantic-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-gpu-
tools/1.27.1-1ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Hector, or anyone else affected,
Accepted intel-gpu-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-gpu-
tools/1.26-2ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Leonardo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted intel-gpu-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-gpu-
tools/1.26-2ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Leonardo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted intel-gpu-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-gpu-
tools/1.26-2ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Leonardo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted intel-gpu-tools into mantic-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-gpu-
tools/1.27.1-1ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Hector, or anyone else affected,
Accepted intel-gpu-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-gpu-
tools/1.26-2ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Leonardo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted intel-gpu-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-gpu-
tools/1.26-2ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Leonardo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted intel-gpu-tools into mantic-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-gpu-
tools/1.27.1-1ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Hector, or anyone else affected,
Accepted intel-gpu-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-gpu-
tools/1.26-2ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
I'm concerned that my questions at
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2024-March/005937.html
have not been fully answered. Please could you participate in that
discussion?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
The verification of the Stable Release Update for usbguard has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter
Thank you for the detailed explanation of your testing!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1855189
Title:
usbguard stops responding when recvmsg receives ENOBUFS
To manage notifications
The verification of the Stable Release Update for sagemath has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter
The verification of the Stable Release Update for libreoffice has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
The verification of the Stable Release Update for libreoffice has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you
~ubuntu-release: could we treat this as a blocker for enabling upgrades,
please?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064349
Title:
ubuntu-kernel-accessories does not get installed on
Public bug reported:
Upgrading from Jammy to Noble, we need the kernel metapackage to switch
from the Jammy HWE one to linux-generic or similar. linux-generic
Recommends ubuntu-kernel-accessories. It should get pulled in on
upgrade. It's important to ensure that this works so it is the same as
in
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 01:28:03PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> The next TB meeting should be on May 7 but there is a Canonical event on
> that week and I expect most of the TB members are not going to be available.
> Should we skip and have the next meeting on May 21?
+1
--
technical-board
I've removed this from the queue as requested. Thank you for all your
work on this!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056485
Title:
Behaviour of socat in Ubuntu 20.04 unexpected
To
Hello Paride, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libvirt into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/6.0.0-0ubuntu8.20 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Mauricio, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libvirt into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/6.0.0-0ubuntu8.20 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Mauricio identified that there are many symbols added in libvirt-daemon-
driver-qemu.so, due to the inclusion of the RPC archives, associated
with gcc/ld export-dynamic in the build (which includes all symbols, not
just actually used). On consultation with both Mauricio and Sergio, we
concluded
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~racb/ubuntu/+source/unhide/+git/unhide/+merge/464618
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062269
Title:
incorrect parsing of long
The verification of the Stable Release Update for openssh has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
It's not clear to me if a simple "ssh -Snone localhost" is covered by
the autopkgtests, so I did that manually, testing without -proposed
first, and ensuring to run "sudo systemctl restart ssh" after upgrading
to -proposed to ensure that I'm definitely hitting the daemon from
-proposed.
Success
The verification of the Stable Release Update for openssh has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
It's not clear to me if a simple "ssh -Snone localhost" is covered by
the autopkgtests, so I did that manually, testing without -proposed
first, and ensuring to run "sudo systemctl restart ssh" after upgrading
to -proposed to ensure that I'm definitely hitting the daemon from
-proposed.
Success
** Tags added: reboot-required
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1747499
Title:
98-reboot-required and Interaction with livepatch
Status in
** Tags added: reboot-required
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2017401
Title:
Unexpected / unwanted unattended-upgrades behaviour after kernel
** Tags added: reboot-required
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1747499
Title:
98-reboot-required and Interaction with livepatch
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Tags added: reboot-required
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1998947
Title:
restore reboot notification so that users are notified after
unattended-upgrades
To manage
** Tags added: reboot-required
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2036213
Title:
Duplicate reboot prompt is displayed
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Tags added: reboot-required
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2017401
Title:
Unexpected / unwanted unattended-upgrades behaviour after kernel
upgrade when Livepatch enabled
To
Hi,
Prior to Noble, the pastebinit command defaulted to paste.ubuntu.com. In
Noble, this has changed to dpaste.com due to an upstream change[1].
What do Ubuntu developers think the default should be? If it should
remain paste.ubuntu.com, we can ask upstream to change it back, or add a
delta for
> would like this avenue to be investigated
To be clear, I mean the general avenue of workarounds in mkvterm, not
necessarily my specific idea.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056485
I consulted with other SRU team members today.
We agree that the bug is valid and that the current behaviour is wrong.
However, if we were to change behaviour, the concern is that existing
users might be regressed in a way that will be difficult for them to
track down. The trade-off we must make
> still if adding hwclock command back has no conflict, it will be great
helpful for customers.
Unfortunately hwclock is in universe so we cannot easily ship it
automatically any more. We'd have to promote it back to main first. So
it isn't so easy.
If you wish to undertake "Guest Customization"
Here's some more background:
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-
devel/2011-May/002526.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039206
Title:
open-vm-tools "hwclock" needed
The reason hwclock isn't shipped any more is that Ubuntu now uses
systemd's functionality to perform the same task instead. To configure
RTC translation between UTC and local time, the primary supported method
is now "sudo timedatectl set-local-rtc 0" or "sudo timedatectl set-
local-rtc 1". See
Hello Jamie, or anyone else affected,
Accepted usbguard into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usbguard/0.7.6+ds-1ubuntu1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Accepting, but in the Test Plan, please could you elaborate on how long
you need to typically wait to see the reproducer, so that a third party
will be able to verify if they are not affected? Eg. 1 minute, 1 hour, 1
day or 1 week? Then, during SRU verification, if we wait (say) double
that time,
Hello Roland, or anyone else affected,
Accepted pure-ftpd into focal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pure-
ftpd/1.0.49-4ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Arrigo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted python-qrencode into jammy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-
qrencode/1.2-5ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Denys, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ngspice into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ngspice/36+ds-1ubuntu0.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Interleaving Frank's and jldolan's comments here:
> I just assumed socat was not a very popular package.
My experience is the opposite! I understand it to be used in all kinds
of corners - particularly in user scripts that don't appear in the
archive.
> I've learned (and I generally agree with
Ah sorry, I think I know what this is. Let me look again.
** Changed in: logcheck (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
** Changed in: logcheck (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Robie Basak (racb)
** Tags added: server-todo
--
You received this bug notification becau
steps to reproduce or have a correction to make to my analysis,
please do that in a comment and then change the status back to New.
Thanks!
** Changed in: logcheck (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Incomplete
** Changed in: logcheck (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Robie Basak (racb) => (unassigne
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 12:34:31PM +0200, Miriam Espana Acebal wrote:
> I'm sending this as my formal announcement to apply for Server Upload
> Rights, in retrospect.
On 18 March the DMB moved to approve Miriam's application.
Congratulations, Miriam!
On behalf of the DMB,
Robie
signature.asc
SRU review
> +-version_attributes = set(["lio_version", "version"])
> +-discovery_auth_attributes = set(["discovery_auth"])
These might be accessed by an API caller somewhere, and so would
represent a regression. I spent some time digging around and didn't find
a direct example, so I was going
** Changed in: logcheck (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Robie Basak (racb)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059857
Title:
logcheck report flooded with cron session li
** Tags added: regression-update
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055776
Title:
After updating ubuntu, the network to which the subnet address is
** Tags added: regression-update
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055776
Title:
After updating ubuntu, the network to which the subnet address is
assigned does not become active in
@dgadomski looks like you signed the uploads. Please could you take a
look and re-upload with the correct versions?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1988942
Title:
Failed to set image
SRU review
Please could you explain why "minor-corrections-in-makefile-and-test-
sh.patch" is required - in particular the change to Makefile.in, but
also the test change? If only parts are required, can the patch be made
more minimal?
> [ Where problems could occur ]
I accept that this is a
> [Rationale]
> - The package bpfcc is required in Ubuntu main as a runtime dependency of
> bpftrace.
Correction: this is true, but we'd also like bpfcc-tools in its own
right since these tools are recommended by experts for direct use.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
The main user story being implemented here is the one specified by
Brendan Gregg in his literature, including his book "Systems
Performance, 2nd Edition". In that book he specifies "Linux crisis tool
packages" [Table 4.1], which specifies bpfcc-tools and a bunch of
binaries provided by that.
This is in the Noble release pocket now.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055432
Title:
[needs-packaging] Metapackage
** Tags added: needs-upstream-report
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051288
Title:
byobu should revert to dmidecode if bogomips in /proc/cpuinfo are set
to zero
To manage
This sounds like exactly the behaviour that I explained in 2013 here:
https://askubuntu.com/a/332421/7808
ifconfig still exists but is deprecated and no longer shipped by
default. Users should use its replacement "ip" instead.
However it is true that ifconfig does not display the additional
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Tags added: server-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
This sounds like exactly the behaviour that I explained in 2013 here:
https://askubuntu.com/a/332421/7808
ifconfig still exists but is deprecated and no longer shipped by
default. Users should use its replacement "ip" instead.
However it is true that ifconfig does not display the additional
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Tags added: server-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: logcheck (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: logcheck (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Tags added: server-todo
** Tags added: bitesize
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
As usual my feeling about doing +1 maintenance is that I'm not able to
be helpful. I'd be happy to take specific work items ("fix this build"
or "figure out this test failure") but I'm just flailing around trying
to find something to do. Most threads I pull on seem to be things that
either someone
Dear Technical Board,
The DMB have agreed to my proposal below. Please could you now consider
approving it?
Thanks,
Robie
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 08:18:38PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The terms of three current DMB members will come to an end on
> 2024-03-29, and the re
** Also affects: yforth (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: yforth (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: yforth (Ubuntu Mantic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: yforth (Ubuntu Noble)
** Also affects: numptyphysics (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1936449
Title:
numptyphysics segfault on startup on XUb 21.04
1 - 100 of 17409 matches
Mail list logo
