In both cases I'm running:
installed: 98.0.4758.9 (1868) 154MB -
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849478
Title:
[snap] (experimental)
So I have this sort of working on my machine that's running Impish. The
only annoying thing is that the window selector pop-up appears twice,
and the second one seems superfluous (I have to hit Cancel on it).
On a freshly installed Jammy machine, I had to enable
So I have this sort of working on my machine that's running Impish. The
only annoying thing is that the window selector pop-up appears twice,
and the second one seems superfluous (I have to hit Cancel on it).
On a freshly installed Jammy machine, I had to enable
In both cases I'm running:
installed: 98.0.4758.9 (1868) 154MB -
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849478
Title:
[snap] (experimental) pipewire support not
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 07:52:36AM -, You-Sheng Yang wrote:
> @racb, please advice the next action to be taken for this SRU. Shall we
> suspend the work here and wait for all other bits being ready in Jammy?
You can continue work on the various pieces, but I don't think it's a
good idea to
The following subscriptions are missing:
frr
Missing subscriptions added
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
It seems to be like this is a bug in encfs rather than in rsync? I
appreciate newer rsync might have changed behaviour, but ultimately
encfs needs to provide a regular (if virtual) filesystem. Where it
doesn't, rsync can't be expected to work.
Is there any specific reason to think that encfs is
It seems to be like this is a bug in encfs rather than in rsync? I
appreciate newer rsync might have changed behaviour, but ultimately
encfs needs to provide a regular (if virtual) filesystem. Where it
doesn't, rsync can't be expected to work.
Is there any specific reason to think that encfs is
On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 09:25:44AM +0100, Filip Menke wrote:
> Is there a reason why the wireguard package is outdated and no updates are
> available through the standard update process(apt-get update / upgrade)?
Updates to packages in stable releases in Ubuntu are only made under
special
Thank you for the detailed explanation!
> All the components can be found in
https://launchpad.net/~oem-solutions-group/+archive/ubuntu/intel-ipu6,
and are being proposed for inclusion to Ubuntu archive at. the same
time
What's the status of the inclusion of the entire stack in Jammy? I don't
I'm not sure if everyone is having the issue here. But if in named.conf
you're explicitly binding to a particular address, then you need to
*also* configure named to start only after that interface is configured.
See https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2021-May/041455.html
for some
On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 07:20:42PM +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> LP: #510587 - (Triaged) [bind9] - Bind/named
> does not initialize on boot due to missing IPv6
> address
>
> This is a decade old bug. The users are still hitting
> this and I wonder if there's something that we can do
>
> I guess the goal there would just be to say the issue occurred X times
in Y hours on 1.44.1-1ubuntu1, and zero times in Z hours on -proposed.
I think something like that would be fine, yes.
I'm not sure about using Mint for the test though. Are there any direct
users of Ubuntu who could test
> I guess the goal there would just be to say the issue occurred X times
in Y hours on 1.44.1-1ubuntu1, and zero times in Z hours on -proposed.
I think something like that would be fine, yes.
I'm not sure about using Mint for the test though. Are there any direct
users of Ubuntu who could test
> I guess the goal there would just be to say the issue occurred X times
in Y hours on 1.44.1-1ubuntu1, and zero times in Z hours on -proposed.
I think something like that would be fine, yes.
I'm not sure about using Mint for the test though. Are there any direct
users of Ubuntu who could test
Hello Albourne, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.5~18.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing
Hello Albourne, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into impish-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.5~21.10.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing
Hello Renan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.5~20.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Albourne, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.5~16.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing
Hello Albourne, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.5~20.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing
Hello Albourne, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into hirsute-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.5~21.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing
27.5~22.04.1 is in jammy-proposed.
** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956456
Title:
[SRU]
Hello Renan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.5~16.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Renan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.5~18.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Renan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into hirsute-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.5~21.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing
Hello Renan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into impish-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.5~21.10.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
** Tags added: ftbfs update-excuse
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945956
Title:
mysql-8.0: Fail to build against OpenSSL 3.0
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Committed to uvtool main (and renamed from master while I was there).
Thanks!
** Changed in: uvtool
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956366
> On a MIPI camera through Intel IPU6 platform that its raw V4L2
loopback interface is preserved for Intel Camera HAL libraries, a relay
daemon + v4l2loopback is used to allow the usage of legacy V4L2 based
apps.
Why is this camera's raw V4L2 loopback interface being "preserved for
Intel Camera
The patch and upload look good. Thanks!
> To my knowledge, there is not a 100% reproducer for gvfs from
userspace as this is a probable lock-ordering issue in lower-level code.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/1941 contains a reproducer
for the underlying glib issue.
I appreciate the
The patch and upload look good. Thanks!
> To my knowledge, there is not a 100% reproducer for gvfs from
userspace as this is a probable lock-ordering issue in lower-level code.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/1941 contains a reproducer
for the underlying glib issue.
I appreciate the
The patch and upload look good. Thanks!
> To my knowledge, there is not a 100% reproducer for gvfs from
userspace as this is a probable lock-ordering issue in lower-level code.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/1941 contains a reproducer
for the underlying glib issue.
I appreciate the
Looks like a 9.4 update is in progress in bug 1951033 which should
resolve this issue for all users I think.
I did tag this bug "regression-update". It's caused by the deletion of a
publication in the -updates pocket rather than the normal case of a new
package being published there, but it seems
The following subscriptions are missing:
isc-kea
Missing subscriptions added
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
e can move the repository
and/or provide ACLs to relevant other teams as needed.
Robie
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 09:04:54AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 07:31:16AM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 10:19:12AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > O
The following subscriptions are missing:
php8.1
Missing subscriptions added
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 10:19:12AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 08:00:23AM +, robie.ba...@canonical.com wrote:
> > The following subscriptions are superfluous:
> > php8.1
> > Superfluous subscriptions removed
>
> Please revert this, I subscribed the server team to
The following subscriptions are superfluous:
php8.1
Superfluous subscriptions removed
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 04:27:31PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> This is now ready to use from the Launchpad point of view. There's a
> "proposed_not_automatic" flag on distro series exported over the API; if
> this is set to True, Launchpad writes "NotAutomatic: yes" and
> "ButAutomaticUpgrades:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 04:27:31PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> This is now ready to use from the Launchpad point of view. There's a
> "proposed_not_automatic" flag on distro series exported over the API; if
> this is set to True, Launchpad writes "NotAutomatic: yes" and
> "ButAutomaticUpgrades:
Hello nikhil, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ceph into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/15.2.14-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Utkarsh, or anyone else affected,
Accepted openssh into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.4 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Utkarsh, or anyone else affected,
Accepted openssh into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.4 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Utkarsh, or anyone else affected,
Accepted openssh into hirsute-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/1:8.4p1-5ubuntu1.2 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Utkarsh, or anyone else affected,
Accepted openssh into hirsute-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/1:8.4p1-5ubuntu1.2 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
I'm unable to attend today's meeting.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
Public bug reported:
TBC
Related bug is bug 1951130 which wasn't needed because python-asgiref an
optional dependency for flask. However it looks like it's a required
dependency of python-django 3.2.
** Affects: python-asgiref (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Incomplete
**
(and in Impish in 1.16.6-2ubuntu1)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to modemmanager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946096
Title:
Support manual firmware upgrading for Foxconn and Quectel modems.
(and in Impish in 1.16.6-2ubuntu1)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to modemmanager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946096
Title:
Support manual firmware upgrading for Foxconn and Quectel modems.
Status in OEM
Fixed in Jammy in 1.18.2-0ubuntu1.
** Changed in: modemmanager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to modemmanager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946096
Hello Jerry, or anyone else affected,
Accepted modemmanager into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modemmanager/1.16.6-2~20.04.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
(and in Impish in 1.16.6-2ubuntu1)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946096
Title:
Support manual firmware upgrading for Foxconn and Quectel modems.
To manage notifications about this
Fixed in Jammy in 1.18.2-0ubuntu1.
** Changed in: modemmanager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to modemmanager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946096
Title:
Support
Fixed in Jammy in 1.18.2-0ubuntu1.
** Changed in: modemmanager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946096
Title:
Support manual firmware
Hello Jerry, or anyone else affected,
Accepted modemmanager into hirsute-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modemmanager/1.16.6-2~21.04.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Jerry, or anyone else affected,
Accepted modemmanager into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modemmanager/1.16.6-2~20.04.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
I think all concerns raised have now been addressed so I'm accepting the
upload into Hirsute and Focal.
** Changed in: modemmanager (Ubuntu Hirsute)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-hirsute
--
You received this bug notification because
Hello Jerry, or anyone else affected,
Accepted modemmanager into hirsute-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modemmanager/1.16.6-2~21.04.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
I think all concerns raised have now been addressed so I'm accepting the
upload into Hirsute and Focal.
** Changed in: modemmanager (Ubuntu Hirsute)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-hirsute
--
You received this bug notification because
Hello Jerry, or anyone else affected,
Accepted modemmanager into hirsute-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modemmanager/1.16.6-2~21.04.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Jerry, or anyone else affected,
Accepted modemmanager into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modemmanager/1.16.6-2~20.04.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
I think all concerns raised have now been addressed so I'm accepting the
upload into Hirsute and Focal.
** Changed in: modemmanager (Ubuntu Hirsute)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-hirsute
--
You received this bug notification because
An upload of liboping to bionic-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "No users evidently still
affected or expected to be affected.".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
> I will consult with the wider SRU team on their opinion of this
pattern of digging up old bugs in old LTSes and fixing them.
I spoke to another SRU team member who concurred. We're not willing to
accept an SRU unless there is at least one user reported or expected to
benefit from it.
This needed "update-maintainer" (see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianMaintainerField) but otherwise looks fine.
Thanks!
Uploading to ubuntu (via ftp to upload.ubuntu.com):
Uploading ssl-cert_1.1.1ubuntu1.dsc: done.
Uploading ssl-cert_1.1.1ubuntu1.tar.xz: done.
Uploading
)
Assignee: Robie Basak (racb) => (unassigned)
** Tags added: rls-jj-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to ubiquity in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951399
Title:
Ubuntu, Budgie, Kubuntu, Kylin, MATE, Xubuntu: ja
)
Assignee: Robie Basak (racb) => (unassigned)
** Tags added: rls-jj-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951399
Title:
Ubuntu, Budgie, Kubuntu, Kylin, MATE, Xubuntu: jammy daily fa
In Ubuntu we've temporarily restored tempfile (for Jammy), but it's
still deprecated and prints a deprecation notice to stderr, so I'm
leaving the tasks for the other packages open, as they still need to
move away from using tempfile.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
In Ubuntu we've temporarily restored tempfile (for Jammy), but it's
still deprecated and prints a deprecation notice to stderr, so I'm
leaving the tasks for the other packages open, as they still need to
move away from using tempfile.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 12:45:56PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 03:56:28PM +0000, Robie Basak wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 12:53:03PM +0000, Robie Basak wrote:
> > > Any objections to an upload to debianutils in Ubuntu reverting these
Thank you for working on this!
Is there at least a single user of this package on Bionic who would
benefit from this to be fixed in Bionic, or likely to be such a user in
the future? If so, then +1 to accept this SRU. If not, then I'm
reluctant because the code touched is the main code path
Hello desrt, or anyone else affected,
Accepted deja-dup into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deja-
dup/37.1-2fakesync1ubuntu0.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
From a quick glance at the code, Xenial doesn't look fixed to me. Bionic
has the issue and so the SRU for Bionic is correct. Focal has the issue
fixed.
Since Xenial is past the end of standard support I expect it won't be
fixed for this issue anyway, but I'm just noting that the bug status may
be
Hello desrt, or anyone else affected,
Accepted deja-dup into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deja-
dup/37.1-2fakesync1ubuntu0.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
From a quick glance at the code, Xenial doesn't look fixed to me. Bionic
has the issue and so the SRU for Bionic is correct. Focal has the issue
fixed.
Since Xenial is past the end of standard support I expect it won't be
fixed for this issue anyway, but I'm just noting that the bug status may
be
Hello Hui, or anyone else affected,
Accepted pulseaudio into impish-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/1:15.0+dfsg1-1ubuntu2.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Hui, or anyone else affected,
Accepted pulseaudio into impish-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/1:15.0+dfsg1-1ubuntu2.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Hui, or anyone else affected,
Accepted pulseaudio into impish-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/1:15.0+dfsg1-1ubuntu2.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 01:57:33PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> I think it's fine to keep that deprecation warning.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 02:12:13PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Let's keep them, suddenly undeprecating it would be weird. It also
> apparently broke no or few
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 03:56:28PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 12:53:03PM +0000, Robie Basak wrote:
> > Any objections to an upload to debianutils in Ubuntu reverting these two
> > changes?
>
> It turned out to be a bit of a rabbithole getting t
Source: debianutils
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS when making a derived work, contrary to the spirit
of the Debian Social Contract
Version: 5.5-1
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu jammy
Hi,
If I patch the debianutils source package, then I find that I cannot
Source: debianutils
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS when making a derived work, contrary to the spirit
of the Debian Social Contract
Version: 5.5-1
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu jammy
Hi,
If I patch the debianutils source package, then I find that I cannot
Hello Steve, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-
tools/27.4.2~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing
Hello Steve, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-
tools/27.4.2~18.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing
Hello Steve, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-
tools/27.4.2~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing
Hello Steve, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into impish-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-
tools/27.4.2~21.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing
Hello Steve, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into hirsute-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-
tools/27.4.2~21.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~racb/ubuntu/+source/debianutils/+git/debianutils/+merge/412397
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951399
Title:
Ubuntu, Budgie,
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~racb/ubuntu/+source/debianutils/+git/debianutils/+merge/412397
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to ubiquity in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951399
Title:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 05:16:52PM +0100, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
> On 2021-11-25 16:56, Robie Basak wrote:
> >It turned out to be a bit of a rabbithole getting the package to rebuild
> >with translated string changes, but I have a work-in-progress branch up
> &
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 12:53:03PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> Any objections to an upload to debianutils in Ubuntu reverting these two
> changes?
It turned out to be a bit of a rabbithole getting the package to rebuild
with translated string changes, but I have a work-in-progress branch u
Bug 1950692 and this mailing list thread
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2021-November/041688.html
are follow ups from comments 42 and 44 requesting that the ubuntu-
advantage-tools package be removable. If you want this, please
participate in the discussion - otherwise it's
Bug 1950692 and this mailing list thread
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2021-November/041688.html
are follow ups from comments 42 and 44 requesting that the ubuntu-
advantage-tools package be removable. If you want this, please
participate in the discussion - otherwise it's
Bug 1950692 and this mailing list thread
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2021-November/041688.html
are follow ups from comments 42 and 44 requesting that the ubuntu-
advantage-tools package be removable. If you want this, please
participate in the discussion - otherwise it's
Anyone who wants this changed should participate in the thread. If
nobody is prepared to make the case there, then this change is unlikely
to happen.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 05:19:38PM -0300, Lucas Moura wrote:
> We want to ask for opinions of this change to other Ubuntu developers, to
> see if we are not missing any other aspect around the original decision to
> include the package into *Depends*.
Thank you Lucas for raising this here!
You may be aware of a couple of recent changes in debianutils in Debian:
1. The "tempfile" command has been removed.
2. The "which" command now prints a deprecation warning on every
invocation.
These have ramifications across the archive, and also outside the
archive, as everything that relies
> No user will use xf86-video-armsoc-endlessm (1.4.1-0ubuntu6~20.04).
In *your* use case I'm sure this is true. But this package ships in
Ubuntu for everyone, not just for you or your customer. Please provide a
credible explanation of *why* you think there are no other users, rather
than just
Before I was relying on the information presented here and the changelog
in the upload to consider regression risk. Today I reviewed the patches
in more detail expecting to find what has been described. What's going
on in 01_modem-quectel.patch? This says "add support for EM120/160 PCIe
modules"
Before I was relying on the information presented here and the changelog
in the upload to consider regression risk. Today I reviewed the patches
in more detail expecting to find what has been described. What's going
on in 01_modem-quectel.patch? This says "add support for EM120/160 PCIe
modules"
1201 - 1300 of 17436 matches
Mail list logo
