Re: kamp down

I'm CC:ing this to debian-kbsd too! On Sun, 2018-05-06 at 19:31 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Sat, 2018-05-05 at 01:45 +0100, James Clarke wrote: Pasted from irc, this is becoming a bad story. Do you have anybody who can help (or teach me more on how to administer a buildd): (10:43:04

Bug#897794: How to fix symbols files to work with gcc-7 and gcc-8 (Was: Bug#897794: libquazip: ftbfs with GCC-8)

On Fri, 2018-05-04 at 23:16 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Yavor, > > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 04:06:05PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: > > Andreas Tille wrote: > > > What's the correct way to fix the symbols file to work with both > > > versions of gcc? > Guess what, C++ is more complex than C.

Re: How to fix symbols files to work with gcc-7 and gcc-8 (Was: Bug#897794: libquazip: ftbfs with GCC-8)

On Fri, 2018-05-04 at 23:16 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Yavor, > > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 04:06:05PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: > > Andreas Tille wrote: > > > What's the correct way to fix the symbols file to work with both > > > versions of gcc? > Guess what, C++ is more complex than C.

Re: How to fix symbols files to work with gcc-7 and gcc-8 (Was: Bug#897794: libquazip: ftbfs with GCC-8)

On Fri, 2018-05-04 at 23:16 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Yavor, > > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 04:06:05PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: > > Andreas Tille wrote: > > > What's the correct way to fix the symbols file to work with both > > > versions of gcc? > Guess what, C++ is more complex than C.

Re: I mentioned that lwip was ported to the hurd on the tcp ip gsoc page

On Fri, 2018-05-04 at 17:08 -0400, Joshua Branson wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed that the tcp/ip webpage for the Hurd does not mention that > we > already have a port of the lwip tcp/ip stack. This patch briefly > explains it. Hi, a small typo: pfinit -> pfinet :) and ... device drivers in

Bug#897416: mpfr4: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64

On Thu, 2018-05-03 at 14:59 +0100, James Clarke wrote: > On 3 May 2018, at 09:21, Svante Signell <svante.sign...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-05-02 at 12:51 +0100, James Clarke wrote: > > > Control: reassign -1 gcc-7 > > > Control: retitle -1 gcc:

Bug#897416: mpfr4: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64

On Thu, 2018-05-03 at 14:59 +0100, James Clarke wrote: > On 3 May 2018, at 09:21, Svante Signell <svante.sign...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-05-02 at 12:51 +0100, James Clarke wrote: > > > Control: reassign -1 gcc-7 > > > Control: retitle -1 gcc:

Re: Bug#897416: mpfr4: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64

On Thu, 2018-05-03 at 14:59 +0100, James Clarke wrote: > On 3 May 2018, at 09:21, Svante Signell <svante.sign...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-05-02 at 12:51 +0100, James Clarke wrote: > > > Control: reassign -1 gcc-7 > > > Control: retitle -1 gcc:

Bug#897416: mpfr4: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64

On Wed, 2018-05-02 at 12:51 +0100, James Clarke wrote: > Control: reassign -1 gcc-7 > Control: retitle -1 gcc: Decimal float support is not enabled on kfreebsd- > amd64 > > On 2 May 2018, at 10:38, Svante Signell <svante.sign...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > S

Bug#897416: mpfr4: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64

On Wed, 2018-05-02 at 12:51 +0100, James Clarke wrote: > Control: reassign -1 gcc-7 > Control: retitle -1 gcc: Decimal float support is not enabled on kfreebsd- > amd64 > > On 2 May 2018, at 10:38, Svante Signell <svante.sign...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > S

Re: Bug#897416: mpfr4: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64

On Wed, 2018-05-02 at 12:51 +0100, James Clarke wrote: > Control: reassign -1 gcc-7 > Control: retitle -1 gcc: Decimal float support is not enabled on kfreebsd- > amd64 > > On 2 May 2018, at 10:38, Svante Signell <svante.sign...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > S

mpfr4: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64

Source: mpfr4 Version: 4.0.1-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd Hi, mpfr4 FTBFS on kFreebsd-amd64 due to mismatches in the debian/libmpfr6.symbols file. Attached is a file with the symbols generated from the build:

Bug#897416: mpfr4: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64

Source: mpfr4 Version: 4.0.1-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd Hi, mpfr4 FTBFS on kFreebsd-amd64 due to mismatches in the debian/libmpfr6.symbols file. Attached is a file with the symbols generated from the build:

Bug#897416: mpfr4: FTBFS on kfreebsd-amd64

Source: mpfr4 Version: 4.0.1-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd Hi, mpfr4 FTBFS on kFreebsd-amd64 due to mismatches in the debian/libmpfr6.symbols file. Attached is a file with the symbols generated from the build:

Missing link to gcc-9 at gcc-snapshot page

Hello, On the gcc-snapshot web page https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/gcc-snapshot the VCS:Browse link http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/gcccvs/branches/sid/gcc-9/ does not exist. Can you please add that link or change it to point to the correct page? Thanks!

gcc-snapshot 1:20180425-1: Updated patch for Hurd gccgo

Hello, The recent gcc-snapshot 1:20180425-1 in sid FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to that one patch does not apply correctly. The problem was a comment line in src/libgo/configure.ac was removed. The attached updated patch, src_libgo_build.diff, fixes this problem. Thanks! Index:

Access to the buildd database?

Hello, I'm currently hosting a buildd for GNU/kFreeBSD, kamp. In order to find out which packages FTBFS, either new or outdated it would be nice to get the build statistics. Samuel Thibault has developed a set of scripts, https://people.debian.org/~sthibault/scripts, deriving graphs and text

Re: [DNG] New policykit-1 packages in ASCII

On Mon, 2018-04-23 at 14:13 +0200, Edward Bartolo wrote: > Hi, > > Session control permissions issue, XFCE under ASCII,  resolved. I used > the command: > > apt-get install libpolkit-backend-elogind-1-0 > > The resulting installation removed slim. So, I installed xdm, an > extremely antiquated

Request for kFreeBSD (and Hurd) porters

Hi all, Cc: debian-devel The Debian GNU/kFreeBSD port recently obtained a buildd building packages for the sid distribution, kamp. Thank you very much for your effort making this happening jrtc27 :) The buildd is now soon up-to- date building packages being outdated. As you know GNU/Hurd packages

Request for kFreeBSD (and Hurd) porters

Hi all, Cc: debian-devel The Debian GNU/kFreeBSD port recently obtained a buildd building packages for the sid distribution, kamp. Thank you very much for your effort making this happening jrtc27 :) The buildd is now soon up-to- date building packages being outdated. As you know GNU/Hurd packages

Request for kFreeBSD (and Hurd) porters

Hi all, Cc: debian-devel The Debian GNU/kFreeBSD port recently obtained a buildd building packages for the sid distribution, kamp. Thank you very much for your effort making this happening jrtc27 :) The buildd is now soon up-to- date building packages being outdated. As you know GNU/Hurd packages

Re: [DNG] New policykit-1 packages in ASCII

On Thu, 2018-04-19 at 15:32 +0200, Florian Zieboll wrote: > On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 13:54:05 +0200 > Irrwahn wrote: > > > LXDE/SLiM should work well with consolekit on ASCII, provided you have > > at least the following packages installed: > > > >  ii consolekit 0.4.6-6 > >  ii

Re: [DNG] New policykit-1 packages in ASCII

On Wed, 2018-04-18 at 17:35 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Wed, 2018-04-18 at 16:00 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > > Please test the upgrade from Devuan ASCII Beta and/or from De??an > > > Jessie and/or from De??an Stretch as extensively as possible, and > &

Re: [DNG] New policykit-1 packages in ASCII

On Wed, 2018-04-18 at 16:51 +0100, KatolaZ wrote: > > I don't understand what you mean: > > root@akela:/etc/apt# apt-cache policy sysvinit > sysvinit: >   Installed: 2.88dsf-59.9+devuan2 >   Candidate: 2.88dsf-59.9+devuan2 > > The same version is in ascii and in ascii-proposed.  apt-cache

Re: [DNG] New policykit-1 packages in ASCII

On Wed, 2018-04-18 at 16:00 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Wed, 2018-04-18 at 12:11 +0100, KatolaZ wrote: > > Dear D1rs, > > > > just to let you know that, thanks to the work of Svante and several > > other devs, a new version of policykit (0.105-18+devuan2.9) wi

Re: [DNG] New policykit-1 packages in ASCII

On Wed, 2018-04-18 at 15:18 +0100, KatolaZ wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 04:00:15PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > > > The package still in ascii-proposed, elogind 234.4-2 and sysvinit (2.88dsf- > > 59.9+devuan2) should also migrate to ascii! > > > >

Re: [DNG] New policykit-1 packages in ASCII

On Wed, 2018-04-18 at 12:11 +0100, KatolaZ wrote: > Dear D1rs, > > just to let you know that, thanks to the work of Svante and several > other devs, a new version of policykit (0.105-18+devuan2.9) will hit > ascii repos soon. This version should solve most of the problems with > the selection of

Re: [DNG] Dist-upgrade to ACSII error

On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 07:54 -0300, Emiliano Marini wrote: > I just apt-get update && apt-get upgrade and now my eudev version is > 3.2.2-13. And udev version is? > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 7:52 AM, Emiliano Marini > wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:42 PM, KatolaZ

Re: Debian/Hurd: Console Timeout Error

On Sun, 2018-04-08 at 14:33 -0400, Charlie Sale wrote: > I tried doing that, but I got some errors during the process. Here is > what I did: > > 1. $ fdisk -l debian-hurd*.img > output: > Device    Boot   Start  End Sectors  Size Id > Type  > debian-hurd-20171101.img1

Re: Debian/Hurd: Console Timeout Error

On Sun, 2018-04-08 at 10:46 -0400, Charlie Sale wrote: > > The other major issues is that fsck fails during the boot. I don't > know if this is as important as the console failure, but I thought I > would point it out. Hi Charlie, You should check your image from your Linux host: NOTE: Check

Re: An April 1 joke? Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add systemd.

Sorry, I'm not subscribed to this list. Hopefully this reply comes in correct thread order. > Hi, > > > And the same happens again: He does not condemn systemd, calling it Free > > Software due to the GPL license. In my opinion systemd is violating one of  > > the 4 > > freeedoms of GPL:

Re: An April 1 joke? Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add systemd.

On Mon, 2018-04-02 at 10:38 -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 11:42:16AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > > Hi, > > Hi and welcome to the Guix community... Thanks! > > Seeing this on April 1st I really hope it is a joke. If not I'm not > > ever go

An April 1 joke? Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add systemd.

Hi, Seeing this on April 1st I really hope it is a joke. If not I'm not ever going to support GNU software or anything GNU related any more. You should be ashamed of yourselves. Do you regularly upgrade the elogind packages by Gentoo,  https://wiki. gentoo.org/wiki/Elogind originally created by

Re: Upstreaming the glibc Hurd port

On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 09:20 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, on mar. 27 mars 2018 02:54:06 +0200, wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 00:50 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Svante Signell, on lun. 26 mars 2018 23:53:31 +0200, wrote: > > > > On Mon, 201

Re: Upstreaming the glibc Hurd port

On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 00:50 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, on lun. 26 mars 2018 23:53:31 +0200, wrote: > > On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 02:52 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Samuel Thibault, on lun. 19 mars 2018 02:51:22 +0100, wrote: > > > > - Fixing G

Re: Samuel: Do you have permission to _enable_ the gccgo patches again?

On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 00:49 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, on lun. 26 mars 2018 19:50:58 +0200, wrote > > Well, a month is a long time indeed. I guess he needed to move forward, > so he dropped; no big deal. Yes it is a big deal. If somebody spends numerous (spare

Re: Samuel: Do you have permission to _enable_ the gccgo patches again?

On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 00:49 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, on lun. 26 mars 2018 19:50:58 +0200, wrote > > Well, a month is a long time indeed. I guess he needed to move forward, > so he dropped; no big deal. Yes it is a big deal. If somebody spends numerous (spare

Re: Samuel: Do you have permission to _enable_ the gccgo patches again?

On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 19:42 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, on lun. 26 mars 2018 19:20:04 +0200, wrote: > > > > What is really wrong is that Matthias Klose removed the Hurd patches. > > Sure, but see what he wrote in the changlog: he found the patches >

Re: Samuel: Do you have permission to _enable_ the gccgo patches again?

On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 19:06 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, on lun. 26 mars 2018 18:50:20 +0200, wrote: > > I just saw: > > https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/gcccvs?view=revision=10084 > > > > This is really a large step BACK: > > It's not a step

Samuel: Do you have permission to _enable_ the gccgo patches again?

Hi Samuel, I just saw: https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/gcccvs?view=revision=10084 This is really a large step BACK: Since you could issue that commit to _disable_ gccgo for Hurd, what about committing to _enable_ gccgo for Hurd instead. I just filed a bug for gcc-8 to build gccgo again:

Samuel: Do you have permission to _enable_ the gccgo patches again?

Hi Samuel, I just saw: https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/gcccvs?view=revision=10084 This is really a large step BACK: Since you could issue that commit to _disable_ gccgo for Hurd, what about committing to _enable_ gccgo for Hurd instead. I just filed a bug for gcc-8 to build gccgo again:

Re: PATCH: Hurd port of go to gcc-8 (gcc-8-8-20180310+) 16 patches

On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 14:44 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 13:29 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > > > The patches really changed are only four: > > src_libgo_runtime.diff > > src_libgo_go_go_build_syslist.go.diff > > src_libgo_go_runt

Re: PATCH: Hurd port of go to gcc-8 (gcc-8-8-20180310+) 16 patches

On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 14:44 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 13:29 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > > > The patches really changed are only four: > > src_libgo_runtime.diff > > src_libgo_go_go_build_syslist.go.diff > > src_libgo_go_runt

Re: PATCH: Hurd port of go to gcc-8 (gcc-8-8-20180310+) 16 patches

On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 14:44 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 13:29 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > > > The patches really changed are only four: > > src_libgo_runtime.diff > > src_libgo_go_go_build_syslist.go.diff > > src_libgo_go_runt

Bug#892167: Update for gcc-8-8-20180312-2

found 892167 8-20180312-2 thanks The go tests still fails on an amd64 platform: make -C build check-go 2>&1 | tee ../make-check-go-8-8-20180312-1.log tail build/gcc/testsuite/go/go.sum  === go Summary === # of expected passes518 # of untested testcases 834

Bug#892167: Update for gcc-8-8-20180312-2

found 892167 8-20180312-2 thanks The go tests still fails on an amd64 platform: make -C build check-go 2>&1 | tee ../make-check-go-8-8-20180312-1.log tail build/gcc/testsuite/go/go.sum  === go Summary === # of expected passes518 # of untested testcases 834

Re: PATCH: Hurd port of go to gcc-8 (gcc-8-8-20180310+) 16 patches

On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 13:29 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > The patches really changed are only four: > src_libgo_runtime.diff > src_libgo_go_go_build_syslist.go.diff > src_libgo_go_runtime.diff > src_libgo_build.diff Correction: five: add-gnu-to-libgo-headers.diff

Re: PATCH: Hurd port of go to gcc-8 (gcc-8-8-20180310+) 16 patches

On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 13:29 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > The patches really changed are only four: > src_libgo_runtime.diff > src_libgo_go_go_build_syslist.go.diff > src_libgo_go_runtime.diff > src_libgo_build.diff Correction: five: add-gnu-to-libgo-headers.diff

Re: PATCH: Hurd port of go to gcc-8 (gcc-8-8-20180310+) 16 patches

On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 13:29 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > The patches really changed are only four: > src_libgo_runtime.diff > src_libgo_go_go_build_syslist.go.diff > src_libgo_go_runtime.diff > src_libgo_build.diff Correction: five: add-gnu-to-libgo-headers.diff

Update: Hurd port for gcc-7 go : 7.3.0-8+ for glibc 2.26+

Hi, Attached is the updated patch, src_libgo_build.diff, to build gccgo properly on Debian GNU/Hurd on gcc-7 (7-7.3.0-{8,9,10}) again after the update of glibc to 2.26+ The libgo tests show the following: === libgo Summary === # of expected passes119 # of unexpected

Update: Hurd port for gcc-7 go : 7.3.0-8+ for glibc 2.26+

Hi, Attached is the updated patch, src_libgo_build.diff, to build gccgo properly on Debian GNU/Hurd on gcc-7 (7-7.3.0-{8,9,10}) again after the update of glibc to 2.26+ The libgo tests show the following: === libgo Summary === # of expected passes119 # of unexpected

Update: Hurd port for gcc-7 go : 7.3.0-8+ for glibc 2.26+

Hi, Attached is the updated patch, src_libgo_build.diff, to build gccgo properly on Debian GNU/Hurd on gcc-7 (7-7.3.0-{8,9,10}) again after the update of glibc to 2.26+ The libgo tests show the following: === libgo Summary === # of expected passes119 # of unexpected

Re: Accepted gcc-8 8-20180308-1 (source) into unstable

On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 22:50 +0700, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 08.03.2018 19:25, Svante Signell wrote: > > On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 07:52 +, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > > > > Changes: > > >  gcc-8 (8-20180308-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > >  . &g

Re: Accepted gcc-8 8-20180308-1 (source) into unstable

On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 07:52 +, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Changes: >  gcc-8 (8-20180308-1) unstable; urgency=medium >  . >    * GCC 8 snapshot, taken from the trunk 20180308 (r258348). >    * Update GDC to 20180304. >  . >    [ Matthias Klose ] > >    * Remove the go patches for the Hurd.

Bug#892237: [Fwd: Re: [Freewx-maint] Bug#892237: wxpython4.0: FTBFS on hurd-i386: wx*FSW* undeclared]

The reply below only went to the debian-hurd ML, forwarding.--- Begin Message --- On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 23:48 -0500, Scott Talbert wrote: > On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > > >  ../../../../sip/cpp/sip_corecmodule.cpp:15517:51: error: > > '::wxFSW_EVENT_ACCESS' has not been declared > >

Re: [Freewx-maint] Bug#892237: wxpython4.0: FTBFS on hurd-i386: wx*FSW* undeclared

On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 23:48 -0500, Scott Talbert wrote: > On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > > >  ../../../../sip/cpp/sip_corecmodule.cpp:15517:51: error: > > '::wxFSW_EVENT_ACCESS' has not been declared > >  [...] > >  ../../../../sip/cpp/sip_corecmodule.cpp:15529:55: error: > >

Bug#892167: gcc-8: go and libgo testsuites fails on amd64 (and other arches)

Source: gcc-8 Version: 8-20180218-1 Severity: important Tags: sid, buster Usertags: testsuite, gccgo, libgo, amd64 Hi, Running the testsuite for go and libgo with the command make -C build check-go 2>&1 | tee ../make-check-go-8-8-20180218-1.log reveals that most go tests fails: (The test suite

Bug#892167: gcc-8: go and libgo testsuites fails on amd64 (and other arches)

Source: gcc-8 Version: 8-20180218-1 Severity: important Tags: sid, buster Usertags: testsuite, gccgo, libgo, amd64 Hi, Running the testsuite for go and libgo with the command make -C build check-go 2>&1 | tee ../make-check-go-8-8-20180218-1.log reveals that most go tests fails: (The test suite

Re: Future of kFreeBSD in Debian unstable

On Fri, 2018-03-02 at 16:19 +, James Clarke wrote: > On 2 Mar 2018, at 00:12, Svante Signell <svante.sign...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Hi Svante, > Firstly thanks again for the VM offer. The main issue now is the lack > of porters, as there nee

Re: Future of kFreeBSD in Debian unstable

On Fri, 2018-03-02 at 16:19 +, James Clarke wrote: > On 2 Mar 2018, at 00:12, Svante Signell <svante.sign...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Hi Svante, > Firstly thanks again for the VM offer. The main issue now is the lack > of porters, as there nee

Future of kFreeBSD in Debian unstable

Hi, I'm offering you a VM on a fast computer as a buildd for Debian GNU/kFreeBSD, similar to a buildd for Debian GNU/Hurd. Too sad to see kFreeBSD fading away... Some computer data: lscpu Architecture:  x86_64 CPU op-mode(s):32-bit, 64-bit CPU(s):8 Model name: 

Re: [PATCH] hurd: add gscope support

On Thu, 2018-03-01 at 02:23 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Joseph Myers, on jeu. 01 mars 2018 01:17:18 +, wrote: > > Missing spaces before '(' in the calls to atomic_increment,  > > etc. > > Can people _please_ help me with all these? (not only on that patch, but > on the whole set of

Bug#891505: glibc: Causes FTBFS of gcc-8 on hurd-i386

On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 23:55 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, on lun. 26 févr. 2018 11:22:22 +0100, wrote: > > creates a defect gen-sysinfo.go file when libc0.3 >= 2.26-* is installed. > > A lot of cleanup has happened, yes. The question is what actually made >

Bug#891505: glibc: Causes FTBFS of gcc-8 on hurd-i386

On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 23:55 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, on lun. 26 févr. 2018 11:22:22 +0100, wrote: > > creates a defect gen-sysinfo.go file when libc0.3 >= 2.26-* is installed. > > A lot of cleanup has happened, yes. The question is what actually made >

Bug#891530: openrc: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Source: openrc Version: 0.34-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Hi, openrc FTBFS on GNU/Hurd due to some minor issues, see below:   * 0009-build-on-hurd.patch: Fix FTBFS on GNU/Hurd - src/rc/supervise-daemon.c: Add check for SIGPWR -

Bug#891505: glibc: Causes FTBFS of gcc-8 on hurd-i386

On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 11:52 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, on lun. 26 févr. 2018 11:49:46 +0100, wrote: > > Ok, here it is. Be prepared that there are duplicates tough, since the > > entries > > are generated in different order. (I've made a partial edit by mo

Bug#891505: glibc: Causes FTBFS of gcc-8 on hurd-i386

On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 11:52 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, on lun. 26 févr. 2018 11:49:46 +0100, wrote: > > Ok, here it is. Be prepared that there are duplicates tough, since the > > entries > > are generated in different order. (I've made a partial edit by mo

Bug#891505: glibc: Causes FTBFS of gcc-8 on hurd-i386

Source: glibc Version: 2.26-6 Severity: important Affects: gcc-8 glibc-2.26-* User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Hi, glibc versions > 2.25-6 breaks all builds of gcc-8-*/gccgo on GNU/Hurd due to that -fdump-go-spec is broken. >From the buildd logs of gcc-8: 8-20180218-1 (sid)

Bug#891505: glibc: Causes FTBFS of gcc-8 on hurd-i386

Source: glibc Version: 2.26-6 Severity: important Affects: gcc-8 glibc-2.26-* User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Hi, glibc versions > 2.25-6 breaks all builds of gcc-8-*/gccgo on GNU/Hurd due to that -fdump-go-spec is broken. >From the buildd logs of gcc-8: 8-20180218-1 (sid)

Bug#890881: vte2.91: FTBFS on hurd-i386

hanks!From 87cb3252ff23dbb5c9c5c545929afdeee68e7e5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Svante Signell <svante.sign...@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 10:21:23 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Revert "pty: Remove openpty code path" This reverts commit 0e08c0961ef6938c2b35564ce3543a02eb472e20. GNU/Hurd

Re: Glibc port: commit clenup

On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 00:44 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, on dim. 18 févr. 2018 00:40:57 +0100, wrote: > > On Sat, 2018-02-17 at 22:59 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Maybe I can try to help out here after being AFK for a month. Where > > is > &

Re: Glibc port: commit clenup

On Sat, 2018-02-17 at 22:59 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Anatoly A. Kazantsev, on jeu. 25 janv. 2018 21:39:44 +1300, wrote: > > Next branches I will work on are: > > > > - t/pagesize > > I have completely changed the fix there, and commited upstream. Maybe I can try to help out

Re: [DNG] MATE, lightdm, policykit-1 and elogind issues: Was: Re: IMPORTANT! How ...

On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 23:27 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 21:20 +0300, Hleb Valoshka wrote: > > On 2/14/18, Irrwahn <irrw...@freenet.de> wrote: > > > > > Fresh installations of Devuan ASCII 2.0.0 Beta should not be affected. > > &

[DNG] MATE issues: Re: IMPORTANT! How to fix degraded session management after Devuan ASCII upgrade.

On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 21:20 +0300, Hleb Valoshka wrote: > On 2/14/18, Irrwahn wrote: > > > Fresh installations of Devuan ASCII 2.0.0 Beta should not be affected. > > Actually no, i've installed Ascii for testing purposes and systemd > policykit backend was pulled. What is

Re: [DNG] Error when upgrading eudev

On Mon, 2018-02-12 at 11:47 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > The problem is an error in eudev.postinst. I'll submit an upgraded package > soon. As for the transitional udev package you can remove it, but don't purge > it until  3.2.2.11 is available. (Or create the symlink as w

Re: [DNG] Error when upgrading eudev

On Mon, 2018-02-12 at 11:39 +0100, J. Fahrner wrote: > Am 2018-02-11 20:06, schrieb KatolaZ: > > The error is there, and exists only if you have never had udev > > installed. We know how to get around that. Will be fixing that > > shortly. The best way forward is to just symlink /etc/init.d/eudev

Re: [DNG] Error when upgrading eudev

Hi Tom. Are you sure you are upgrading? As apt-cache policy eudev shows, you already have 3.2.2-10 installed? The only package that can still cause problems is the udeb, i.e. used when installing from the *.iso file. Another problem might that you still have /etc/init.d/udev hanging around: What

Re: [DNG] repackaging tutorial

On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 14:29 +0100, Jaromil wrote: > On Tue, 09 Jan 2018, Hendrik Boom wrote: > > > Are there instructions somewhere for taking apart a Debian package, > > making changes, and building a Devuan package? > > soon (matter of days) online there will be a manual for using our new >

Re: boot the Hurd with Guix

On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 11:20 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 11:13 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > This must come from the lack of /proc/self/exe. > > /proc/self/exe is supported in glibc for Hurd since 2.24-18. Are you using an > earlier version? And o

Re: boot the Hurd with Guix

On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 11:20 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 11:13 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > This must come from the lack of /proc/self/exe. > > /proc/self/exe is supported in glibc for Hurd since 2.24-18. Are you using an > earlier version? And o

Re: boot the Hurd with Guix

On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 11:13 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi rennes, > > rennes skribis: > > >   1) Manually run : > >    > > '/gnu/store/6fgz3s8fjva40hsdvs2hs0f5p4bw12jc-guile-static-stripped- > > 2.2.2/bin/guile   > > --version' > > > >   Output: > > > > guile:

Re: boot the Hurd with Guix

On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 11:13 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi rennes, > > rennes skribis: > > >   1) Manually run : > >    > > '/gnu/store/6fgz3s8fjva40hsdvs2hs0f5p4bw12jc-guile-static-stripped- > > 2.2.2/bin/guile   > > --version' > > > >   Output: > > > > guile:

Bug#881569: [Fwd: gdb: FTBFS on hurd-i386]

Ping On Wed, 2017-12-27 at 23:36 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > On Tue, 2017-12-26 at 09:40 +0100, Héctor Orón Martínez wrote: > > Hello Svante, > > > > On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 7:41 PM, Svante Signell > > <svante.sign...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello

Re: Bug#881569: [Fwd: gdb: FTBFS on hurd-i386]

Ping On Wed, 2017-12-27 at 23:36 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > On Tue, 2017-12-26 at 09:40 +0100, Héctor Orón Martínez wrote: > > Hello Svante, > > > > On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 7:41 PM, Svante Signell > > <svante.sign...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello

Re: [DNG] initial elogind package ready / RFC

On Sun, 2018-01-07 at 11:18 +0100, Andreas Messer wrote: > On Sat, Jan 06, 2018 at 09:55:44PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 06, 2018 at 04:41:57PM +0300, Hleb Valoshka wrote: > > > On 2018-01-05 20:08, Andreas Messer wrote: > > > > If anyone like to try it out, checkout branch

Re: Bug#886493: marked as done (general: debian should support nosystemd build profile)

Incredible: What's going on in Debian?? On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 12:31:10AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > reopen 886238 > thanks >  > Did you see this? I thought this was not discussed through yet! Very nice > attitude from Debian DD's indeed :( As I said: don't. Bastian

[Fwd: Bug#886238: marked as done (Please introduce official nosystemd build profile)]

reopen 886238 thanks Did you see this? I thought this was not discussed through yet! Very nice attitude from Debian DD's indeed :(--- Begin Message --- > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Bastian Blank > To: 886238-d...@bugs.debian.org > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Fri, 5

Re: [DNG] request: please evaluate/provide elogind-or-other ASAP

On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 07:55 +0100, Andreas Messer wrote: > Hi Adam, > > On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 11:44:25PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > > [...] > > Thus: could you guys please prioritize work on elogind or some alternative? > > Just started yesterday: https://git.devuan.org/amesser/elogind.

Re: Bug#886238: Please introduce official nosystemd build profile

On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 01:47 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > > > Especially you two shouldn't be fighting.  As far as I know, Svante is > somewhat involved with eudev maintenance in Devuan (done mostly by parazyd, > though), while Marco has a great wealth of udev experience. Well I did the work an

Re: Bug#886238: Please introduce official nosystemd build profile

On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 00:41 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Thu, 04 Jan 2018 at 23:01:07 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > What about creating a linux-nosystemd architecture, e.g. > > dbus-1.12.2/debian/control > > Build-Depends: > >  libsystemd-dev [linux-any !linux

Re: Bug#886238: Please introduce official nosystemd build profile

On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 23:09 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Jan 04, Hleb Valoshka <375...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > "anti-systemd zealots" Steve, when did you join LP fanclub? When > > Ubuntu decided to throw away your upstart and use systemd instead? > > Classy... Yes _your_ reply is classy.

Re: Bug#886238: Please introduce official nosystemd build profile

On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 21:35 +0300, Hleb Valoshka wrote: > On 1/3/18, Andrew Shadura wrote: > > > Do we really need systemd-less builds? I'm not convinced this is > > something relevant to Debian. > > http://angband.pl/deb/archive.html > >

Re: [Evolution] open

On Fri, 2017-12-29 at 12:19 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > > And THIS IS NOT THE PLACE TO RANT ABOUT SYSTEMD. > > > > Nobody did, right? So why do you shout?  > > Because when ever anyone on any Linux related mailing list mentions > systemd it invariable descends into rants about it. I was

Bug#853783: hplip.state

On Fri, 2017-12-29 at 18:20 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > On Thu, 2017-12-21 at 14:06 +, Brian Potkin wrote: > > On Thu 21 Dec 2017 at 14:43:53 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2017-12-21 at 13:08 +, Brian Potkin wrote: > > > > /var/lib/

Bug#853783: hplip.state

On Fri, 2017-12-29 at 18:20 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > On Thu, 2017-12-21 at 14:06 +, Brian Potkin wrote: > > On Thu 21 Dec 2017 at 14:43:53 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2017-12-21 at 13:08 +, Brian Potkin wrote: > > > > /var/lib/

Bug#853783: Reopen 853783

On Thu, 2017-12-21 at 14:06 +, Brian Potkin wrote: > On Thu 21 Dec 2017 at 14:43:53 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > > On Thu, 2017-12-21 at 13:08 +, Brian Potkin wrote: > > > /var/lib/hp/hplip.state. > > > > [plugin] > > installed = 1 > > eul

Bug#853783: Reopen 853783

On Thu, 2017-12-21 at 14:06 +, Brian Potkin wrote: > On Thu 21 Dec 2017 at 14:43:53 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > > On Thu, 2017-12-21 at 13:08 +, Brian Potkin wrote: > > > /var/lib/hp/hplip.state. > > > > [plugin] > > installed = 1 > > eul

Bug#881569: [Fwd: gdb: FTBFS on hurd-i386]

On Tue, 2017-12-26 at 09:40 +0100, Héctor Orón Martínez wrote: > Hello Svante, > > On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 7:41 PM, Svante Signell > <svante.sign...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > These patches was submitted to Debian November 13 2017. Nothing has &g

Re: Bug#881569: [Fwd: gdb: FTBFS on hurd-i386]

On Tue, 2017-12-26 at 09:40 +0100, Héctor Orón Martínez wrote: > Hello Svante, > > On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 7:41 PM, Svante Signell > <svante.sign...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > These patches was submitted to Debian November 13 2017. Nothing has &g

Bug#885248: syslog-ng: FTBFS on hurd-i386: typos in get_path_max

tags 885248 patch thanks On Mon, 2017-12-25 at 22:43 -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Source: syslog-ng > Version: 3.13.2-1 > Severity: important > Tags: upstream > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in > the past) > > Builds of syslog-ng for hurd-i386 (admittedly not

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >