Re: [Kde-pim] Akonadi and Plasma Active

On Thursday 24 January 2013 16:28:58 Kevin Krammer wrote: > On Thursday, 2013-01-24, Marco Martin wrote: > > On Thursday 24 January 2013, Marco Martin wrote: > > > mQuery.prepare( statement ); at line 281 of querybuilder.cpp? seems to > > > always return true > > > > quite interesting finding: > >

Re: [Kde-pim] Akonadi and Plasma Active

On Friday 25 January 2013 16:50:08 Marco Martin wrote: > On Friday 25 January 2013, Volker Krause wrote: > > I know that pretty much the same approach works fine in an other project > > which uses Sqlite and PostgreSQL, so both can - in theory - handle > > prepared > >

Re: [Kde-pim] Kontact Touch GSOC Project - mentor needed

On Thursday 11 April 2013 15:30:51 Kevin Krammer wrote: > On Thursday, 2013-04-11, Michael Bohlender wrote: > > Just "ok" is not good enough for me. So lets see what I can improve. > > Is the project idea itself not exciting enough for you or is this just > > about the technical approach? > > It i

D23202: Fix headers for >=KCalCore-5.12.0

vkrause added a comment. This isn't wrong, but I'm surprised it's needed, we explicitly install headers in the old location too, for compatibility? REPOSITORY R8 Calligra REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D23202 To: asturmlechner, #calligra:_3.0, dfaure, vkrause Cc: Calligra-D

D23202: Fix headers for >=KCalCore-5.12.0

vkrause added a comment. see https://cgit.kde.org/kcalcore.git/tree/src/CMakeLists.txt#n138 - seems to work here But that leaves the problem of the version header, we also need to install that with the old name I think. REPOSITORY R8 Calligra REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde

D23202: Fix headers for >=KCalCore-5.12.0

vkrause added a comment. Version header backward compatibility addressed in D23204 . REPOSITORY R8 Calligra REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D23202 To: asturmlechner, #calligra:_3.0, dfaure, vkrause Cc: Calligra-Devel-list, dcaliste, cochis

Re: Autocorrect functionality

On Mittwoch, 19. Oktober 2022 01:05:19 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Sorry for the cross-posting. > Please CC me, i'm on none of the two lists > > > Both pimcommon and calligra have Autocorrect functionality, but PIM one > broke at some point and I guess no one realized? [...] > Solutions: >

branches/work/kdab-post-4.0/kdepim (silent)

SVN commit 734938 by vkrause: Merged revisions 733086-734926 via svnmerge from https://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/home/kde/trunk/KDE/kdepim r733105 | winterz | 2007-11-05 16:18:49 +0100 (Mon, 05 Nov 2007) | 2 lines use the new debug area. r733112 | winterz | 2007-11-05 16:47:40

Re: [Development] [fix]: Assistant (and others) burning CPU because of #f27d1ccbb24ec2fd4098f2976503478831006cc8 ?

On Thursday, 31 August 2017 00:13:43 CEST Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Wednesday, 30 August 2017 14:17:05 PDT René J. V. Bertin wrote: > > Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > > Oops, missed this one. > > > > > Unfortunately, we can't change anymore. > > > > Can someone explain what could possibly be bro

Re: [Development] [Qt-creator] Requesting repository for telemetry plugin in Qt Creator

Hi, as numerous people have asked me to comment on this by now, let me just do that here publicly (representing KDE's KUserFeedback, not KDAB): Tino is well aware of KUserFeedback, we discussed that last year already in detail. So it definitely was considered as a possible solution for this. I

Re: [Development] [Qt-creator] Requesting repository for telemetry plugin in Qt Creator

ress the commercial user concerns is certainly possible. Regards, Volker > ________ > From: Development > on behalf of Volker Krause Sent: Friday, February > 23, 2018 10:20:23 AM > To: development@qt-project.org; qt-crea...@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [De

[Development] qt_add/removeObject hooks

sn't receive arguments, so both approaches listed above would work. Any preferences on how to handle this one while we are at it? Also, for anyone from Froglogic: Would any of this be causing problems for you guys? regards, Volker -- Volker Krause | volker.kra...@kdab.com | Senior Softwa

Re: [Development] qt_add/removeObject hooks

On Monday 07 April 2014 10:18:40 Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em seg 07 abr 2014, às 17:48:46, Volker Krause escreveu: > > The current situation is that the hooks work fine on Linux/QNX in > > combination with LD_PRELOAD (unless you have a non-recent gold that > > ignores >

Re: [Development] qt_add/removeObject hooks

On Tuesday 08 April 2014 23:53:11 André Pönitz wrote: > On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 11:00:18PM +0200, Olivier Goffart wrote: > > On Tuesday 08 April 2014 07:42:46 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > Em ter 08 abr 2014, às 15:49:16, Volker Krause escreveu: > > > > API-wise we are

Re: [Development] qt_add/removeObject hooks

omics using Olivier's initial benchmark, it's about 4-5x slower for checking if there's a callback set. Since this is affecting every Qt application on a not uncommon hot path, I'd rather trade in theoretical tool stability for general performance. regards, Volker -- Volker

Re: [Development] Request for sandbox area: QQSM

dynamic Signal/Slot connections. Since all SignalTransition > classes provide a boolean result for eventTest(), a single C++ > implementation was created that uses a boolean property ("guard") for the > eventTest result. This allows any QML/Javascript expression that resolves &g

Re: [Development] Asking for a FF exception for ICU based QStringConverter

On Thursday, 9 June 2022 11:36:21 CEST Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development wrote: > Il 09/06/22 01:48, Thiago Macieira ha scritto: > > d) Because if this, code using QStringConverter with non-builtin encodings > > will leak resources unless it's recompiled for 6.4. No source changes are > > necessar

Re: [Gammaray-interest] GammaRay 1.2.2 Planning

t; Comments? Objections? > Are there bugs we need to fix in the meantime? > > -Allen -- Volker Krause | volker.kra...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company Tel. Germany +49-30-521325470, Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts -

Re: [Gammaray-interest] user roles in QAIM

orward now that the role list is no longer hardcoded. regards, Volker On Monday 17 December 2012 10:40:11 Ian Monroe wrote: > How do I introspect user-defined roles in QAbstractItemModel's? Is it > possible? setRoleNames doesn't seem to be enough. -- Volker Krause | volker.kra...@

Re: [Gammaray-interest] GammaRay 1.3 Release Planning

lendar says that we planned to release GammaRay 1.3.0 on 22 Jan (in 5 > days) > > Please let me know if you need more time: the release date is flexible. > > Also let me know about new features we should publicize. > > -Allen -- Volker Krause | volker.kra...@kdab.com | Se

Re: [Gammaray-interest] Git workflow

to the 1.3 branch as well, and have slightly larger 1.3.x releases until 2.0 is ready. regards, Volker -- Volker Krause | volker.kra...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company Tel. Germany +49-30-521325470, Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt

Re: [Gammaray-interest] GammaRay 1.3.1?

.1 release. > Do we need one? > > There have been 0 commits into the 1.3 branch since the last tag. > So I'm guessing the answer is "no". > > But thought I'd ask anyway. > Let me know your thoughts on this. > > -Allen -- Volker Krause | volker.kra...@kdab

Re: [Gammaray-interest] GammaRay 1.3.2

have by now all 24 tools adapted to the new infrastructure, most of them actually work fine remotely even (see status page in the wiki), there are still some bits that need work though. We should have a working preview for QtDD in Berlin, but I don't think that's ready for a large-

Re: [Gammaray-interest] GammaRay 1.3.2

On Monday 23 September 2013 15:03:14 Allen Winter wrote: > On Monday, September 23, 2013 03:27:26 PM Volker Krause wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wednesday 18 September 2013 16:12:34 Allen Winter wrote: > > > I'd like to get a 1.3.2 release out the door sometime so

Re: [Gammaray-interest] Build failure of 2.0.0 on Windows with MSVC 2013

' : > return code > '0x2' > Stop. > > I simple removed this: > > #if defined(_MSC_VER) || defined(Q_OS_ANDROID) // only MSVC and Android > don't have log2()... > static double log2(double n) > { > return log(n) / log(2.0f); > } > #endif &

Re: [Gammaray-interest] Cross-platform remote debugging

s works between Qt versions, between operating systems and between architectures. We have tested various combinations, but I think we had a strong bias towards little endian systems. regards, Volker -- Volker Krause | volker.kra...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&a

Re: [Gammaray-interest] Cross-platform remote debugging

On Thursday 23 January 2014 22:26:53 Peter Kümmel wrote: > On 23.01.2014 10:05, Volker Krause wrote: > > On Wednesday 22 January 2014 17:52:26 Peter Kümmel wrote: > >> Is 2.0 now ready for remote debugging from desktop to embedded ARM > >> systems? > > > > y

Re: [Gammaray-interest] GammaRay 2.0.1

upport for Clang- only platforms like Mac OS X 10.9 lined up for 2.0.1. Thanks for driving this again Allen! Regards, Volker -- Volker Krause | volker.kra...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company Tel. Germany +49-30-521325470, Sweden (H

Re: [Gammaray-interest] Since 2.0, GammaRay doen't work at all

ing of this email > and any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email > in error, please contact the sender and delete the message and any > attachment from your system. > > Thank You. > > -- Volker Krause | volker.kra.

Re: [Gammaray-interest] Since 2.0, GammaRay doen't work at all

> Robert Schimkowitsch > Automation > Development Control Center Systems > ANDRITZ HYDRO GmbH > Eibesbrunnergasse 20 > 1120 Vienna, Austria > Phone: +43 50805 56767 > e-mail: robert.schimkowit...@andritz.com > Internet: www.andritz-hydro.com > > > -Original Me

Re: [Gammaray-interest] Debugging GammaRay

y documented so far. I've started a wiki page for this here: https://github.com/KDAB/GammaRay/wiki/Developing-GammaRay Still very basic, but it should contain the key points for debugging both the probe and the client, at least on Unix. regards, Volker -- Volker Krause | volker.kra...@kd

Re: [Gammaray-interest] GammaRay 2.0.2

tibility with Qt4.7 > * Avoid leaking shared-memory in case of crashes of gammaray-client > * Fix various crashes > * Fix various crashes with heavily multithreaded debuggees > > Greets -- Volker Krause | volker.kra...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&

Re: [Gammaray-interest] 32bit on 64bit system

toolchain file for this, I was unable to get it working properly without that. regards, Volker -- Volker Krause | volker.kra...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company Tel. Germany +49-30-521325470, Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts

Re: [Gammaray-interest] GammaRay 2.1.0 in June

e 27th looks good to me. regards, Volker -- Volker Krause | volker.kra...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company Tel. Germany +49-30-521325470, Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-independent software solutions sm

Re: [Gammaray-interest] GammaRay 2.1.0 in June

On Tuesday 03 June 2014 10:23:13 Allen Winter wrote: > On Tuesday, June 03, 2014 04:01:06 PM Volker Krause wrote: > > Hi, > > > > thanks Allen for driving this again! > > > > On Tuesday 03 June 2014 08:53:00 Allen Winter wrote: > > > Volker and I woul

Re: [Gammaray-interest] GammaRay 2.1.1 Schedule

et me know if want to delay 2.1.1 for any reason. thanks for driving this again Allen! All good to go from my side, I've just pushed two more small fixes to make things work with Qt 5.4 as well. regards, Volker -- Volker Krause | volker.kra...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deuts

Re: [Gammaray-interest] New GammaRay Release(s)?

of larger pending changes or missing important fixes, so no blocker from that side. regards, Volker -- Volker Krause | volker.kra...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company Tel. Germany +49-30-521325470, Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts

Re: [Gammaray-interest] Fwd: building GammaRay on OS X

is needed prior to Qt 5.4, with 5.4 we can use the much superior (faster and more complete coverage) preload injector. regards, Volker -- Volker Krause | volker.kra...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company Tel. +49-30-521325470 KDAB - Th

Re: [Gammaray-interest] Fwd: building GammaRay on OS X

On Thursday 28 May 2015 11:05:34 René J.V. Bertin wrote: > On Thursday May 28 2015 09:34:18 Volker Krause wrote: > > Hi, thanks for answering. > > >Yep, I would guess the CLI (lower-case) binary could just be dropped from > >the bundle. > > For MacPorts it'd

Re: [Gammaray-interest] Fwd: building GammaRay on OS X

On Thursday 28 May 2015 16:47:44 Allen Winter wrote: > On Thursday, May 28, 2015 10:11:47 PM René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > On Thursday May 28 2015 11:14:54 Volker Krause wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > Yep, GAMMARAY_PROBE_ONLY_BUILD. > > > > That

Re: [Gammaray-interest] GammaRay 2.3.0

e to review if I forgot something. Thanks! Volker -- Volker Krause | volker.kra...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company Tel. +49-30-521325470 KDAB - The Qt Experts smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___

Re: [Gammaray-interest] GammaRay 2.3.0

On Thursday 09 July 2015 12:46:06 Allen Winter wrote: > On Thursday, July 09, 2015 05:31:35 PM Volker Krause wrote: > > On Tuesday 30 June 2015 11:36:21 Allen Winter wrote: > > > Howdy, > > > > > > Volker and Kevin think we need a stable version that builds w

Re: [Gammaray-interest] Feature Request: blacklisting of properties

Hi, thanks for the feedback! Yes, I've encountered the problem with property reads having side-effects too (it's even worse in some of the lower-level GL classes where you crash the target if there is no active GL context). There's probably two ways to address this, all out hiding the propert

Re: [Gammaray-interest] GammaRay for UI testing automation

Hi Christian, thanks for the feedback. Regarding Squish, we use that a lot too, and conceptually GammaRay and Squish indeed work very similarly when interacting with the application under test, using the same introspection and tracking mechanisms etc. So technically it's of course conceivable

Re: [Gammaray-interest] GammaRay for UI testing automation

On Sunday, 17 June 2018 04:31:53 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote: > On 15 June 2018 at 23:07, Volker Krause wrote: > > On Friday, 15 June 2018 05:12:53 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote: > >> On 14 June 2018 at 03:47, Volker Krause wrote: > >> The object query engine w

Re: [Gammaray-interest] XPath and ObjectTreeModel

Very cool! On Monday, 18 June 2018 05:07:00 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote: > Hi there, > > Quick email to report about my week-end experiments/gross hacks. > > I created 2 classes: > - ObjectQueryEngine > - ObjectXmlNodeModel (derived from QSimpleXmlNodeModel) > > The ObjectQueryEngine as a

Re: [Gammaray-interest] GammaRay for UI testing automation

On Tuesday, 19 June 2018 06:17:25 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote: > On 19 June 2018 at 11:46, Christian Gagneraud wrote: > > On 18 June 2018 at 19:50, Volker Krause wrote: > >> On Sunday, 17 June 2018 04:31:53 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote: > >>> On 15 June 2018

Re: [Gammaray-interest] QtXmlPatterns and probe's object lock

On Sunday, 24 June 2018 08:01:30 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote: > Hi there, > > It took me a while to find out what the problem was, so here it is: > My query engine would dead-lock if i create a QXmlQuery or a > QXmlFormatter, while holding the probe's lock. > Is it something unexpected or does

Re: [Gammaray-interest] LD_PRELOAD and secure-execution

Hi, On Friday, 1 March 2019 03:14:45 CET Christian Gagneraud wrote: > We ran into a tricky problem at run-time (embedded Linux). > The app i want to introspect has Linux capabilities bits set. This > put ld.so in a `secure-execution` mode. > For the preload to work, we need to meet these 3 condit

Re: [Gammaray-interest] LD_PRELOAD and secure-execution

On Wednesday, 6 March 2019 17:38:50 CET Christian Gagneraud wrote: > On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 09:23, Volker Krause wrote: > > On Friday, 1 March 2019 03:14:45 CET Christian Gagneraud wrote: > > > We ran into a tricky problem at run-time (embedded Linux). > > > The app i w

Re: [Gammaray-interest] Thoughts about the problem scanner

Hi, On Wednesday, 6 March 2019 17:59:24 CET Christian Gagneraud wrote: > A few quick random thoughts, sorry for the "dump" style. > > First thing first: > Have you seen the PR "ObjectInspector: Add thread affinity checker" > (https://github.com/KDAB/GammaRay/pull/538/)? > What do you think? Do yo

Re: [Gammaray-interest] Thoughts about the problem scanner

On Tuesday, 19 March 2019 14:29:53 CET Christian Gagneraud wrote: > On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 at 10:43, Volker Krause wrote: > > > Second: > > > Wouldn't it be nice to run the problem scanner in an automated way? > > > The idea would be to use gammaray as an automate

Re: [Gammaray-interest] Thoughts about the problem scanner

On Saturday, 23 March 2019 15:39:54 CET Christian Gagneraud wrote: > On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 at 09:41, Volker Krause wrote: > > > IMHO, some models should contains these dynamic data in a more > > > processed way, eg AbstractConnectionsModel contains static data, while >

Re: [Gammaray-interest] LD_PRELOADing on QNX

Hi, GammaRay on QNX should work, and ARM64 also works, the combination however is untested. Regarding "raw" injection with LD_PRELOAD, while not officially intended that way, it mostly works in practice. The main problem is getting settings to the probe, as the usual channel for that isn't ava

Re: [Gammaray-interest] Gui missing half of the tools

Hi, that sounds like missing (or incompatible) tool plugins, either on the target side (and thus really only the built-in tools existing), or on the host side so that the tools exist on target but there is just no UI for them. Other reasons like issues with the build configuration as you mentio

Re: [Gammaray-interest] Gui missing half of the tools

On Tuesday, 7 May 2019 06:14:38 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote: > On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 02:49, Volker Krause wrote: > > Hi, > > > > that sounds like missing (or incompatible) tool plugins, either on the > > target side (and thus really only the built-in tools existin

Re: [Gammaray-interest] Gui missing half of the tools

to load the plugins... Regards, Volker > On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 20:37, Volker Krause wrote: > > On Tuesday, 7 May 2019 06:14:38 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote: > > > On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 02:49, Volker Krause wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > >

Re: [Gammaray-interest] Thoughts about the problem scanner

On Friday, 10 May 2019 13:53:40 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote: > [some old draft emails, sorry if it doesn't make sense] > > On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 23:09, Volker Krause wrote: > > > > The signal history model is already quite expensive, you certainly > > > &g

Re: [Gammaray-interest] Object connectivity inspector/viewer

On Friday, 10 May 2019 13:55:45 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote: > [another old draft email, sending it in the hope to bring the discussion > back] > > Hi, > > Starting a new thread. > > As i started coding, i'm slowly realising that the signal history > model might not be the right tool to work

Re: [Gammaray-interest] Graph library

On Tuesday, 28 May 2019 08:48:37 CEST Kevin Funk wrote: > On Friday, 24 May 2019 08:20:58 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote: > > On Fri, 24 May 2019 at 05:34, Kevin Funk wrote: > > > At some point you need to bite the bullet and just write code for one > > > use- > > > case; I've tried the too-generi

Re: [Gammaray-interest] Graph library

On Wednesday, 29 May 2019 16:10:37 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote: > On Wed, 29 May 2019 at 02:50, Volker Krause wrote: > > In general, not having to maintain visualization components as part of > > GammaRay would IMHO be preferable, but if we need something that isn't &

Re: [Gammaray-interest] sub-namespacing

On Wednesday, 5 June 2019 00:04:26 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote: > Is there any special requirement for client/server code about namespacing? > I would like to use a sub-namespace for my plugin. But it seems that > no code does that. > Is it allowed/desirable? I don't think there is any requirem

Re: [Gammaray-interest] Getting rid of "Loading..." on client side models

On Thursday, 6 June 2019 14:15:04 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote: > On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 01:54, Christian Gagneraud wrote: > > When programmatically using remote models to build my graphs, i have > > to deal with a very annoying "feature": the lazy loading. > > > > The problem is that i need to

Re: [Gammaray-interest] Getting rid of "Loading..." on client side models

On Friday, 7 June 2019 05:08:37 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote: > On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 at 02:24, Volker Krause wrote: > > On Thursday, 6 June 2019 14:15:04 CEST Christian Gagneraud wrote: > > > On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 01:54, Christian Gagneraud wrote: > > > > When

[frameworks-syntax-highlighting] [Bug 373286] syntax highlighting wrong for latex with alignat

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373286 Volker Krause changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|vkra...@kde.org |kwrite-bugs-n...@kde.org -- You are receiving

[frameworks-syntax-highlighting] [Bug 373092] Add Krita Dark Syntax Schema

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373092 Volker Krause changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|vkra...@kde.org |kwrite-bugs-n...@kde.org -- You are receiving

[kmail2] [Bug 367598] Kmail needs to force platform xcb on Linux

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367598 Volker Krause changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vkra...@kde.org --- Comment #2 from Volker

[Bug 151831] IMAP resources broken

--- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151831 vkrause kde org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 150790] IMAP resources not working

--- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150790 vkrause kde org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 155223] sieve script is truncated

--- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155223 vkrause kde org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 158681] Remove attachment does not work for some mime structures

--- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158681 vkrause kde org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 158854] kmail deletes wrong attachment

--- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158854 vkrause kde org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug 178916] akonadiserver Doesn't Exit on Logout

http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=178916 Volker Krause vkrause kde org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vkra...@kde.org

[Bug 187633] Akonadi migration error window disappears

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187633 Volker Krause changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kde-b...@ginguppin.de --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 204193] Kmail-Aggregation threading never accepts 'by receiver' as a grouping policy

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204193 --- Comment #5 from Volker Krause 2009-09-15 09:30:44 --- SVN commit 1023662 by vkrause: Merge SVN commit 1012548 by mkoller from trunk: CCBUG: 204193 Fix copy/paste error on GroupBy* enum M +1 -1 aggregation.cpp WebSVN link: http

[Bug 207825] Local-mail resource appears in Kaddressbook

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207825 Volker Krause changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC

[Bug 180713] Kontact crashes when adding a new todo

http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=180713 Volker Krause vkrause kde org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vkra...@kde.org

[Bug 180990] Kontact (kontact) crash on insert a meeting in kalendar

http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=180990 Volker Krause vkrause kde org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vkra...@kde.org

[Bug 172801] akonadi: No Resource Agents found

http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172801 Volker Krause vkrause kde org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vkra...@kde.org

Re: BoF session at the MeeGo conference

On Thursday 26 August 2010 19:19:16 Bart Cerneels wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 15:22, Bart Cerneels wrote: > > Has anyone on this list already send a BoF session proposal? > > > > I was thinking of the following: > > > > We (KDE) and others (Qt) developers have written a lot of Qt code > > alr

Re: Porting KDE code to devices

On Friday 10 September 2010 03:03:50 Alexis Ménard wrote: > There is some packages of kdelibs if you add a kdab repo...check > kdepim-mobile wiki page and you'll get the repo... See http://files.kolab.org/local/maemo for the repositories, package descriptions are in branches/work/komo/packagaing/

Re: Porting KDE code to devices

On Friday 10 September 2010 23:16:48 Aleix Pol wrote: > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Volker Krause wrote: > > On Friday 10 September 2010 03:03:50 Alexis Ménard wrote: > > > There is some packages of kdelibs if you add a kdab repo...check > > > kdepim-mobile wiki p

Re: kdeedu porting to mobile profile (kutils?)

On Tuesday 25 January 2011 18:14:45 Marco Martin wrote: > Hi all, > now the kdeedu packages kinda build on the MeeGo obs, was mostly porting the > kparts usage from the kpart genericfactory to the k plugin factory... > > mostly. > some applications (blinken, kwordquiz, kig, parley) depend on the k

Re: Re: KDE-ify QML all across KDE

On Thursday 27 January 2011 13:39:40 Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote: > Hi Marco, > > I'm am working on Calligra Mobile as an Intern at Nokia. Just remembered > that you had sent this mail. I understand that libkdeclarative is planned to > be *the* way to access essential kdelibs functionality. If so, I

Re: Switching from qt-experimental to qt-stable for Kontact Touch on Maemo

On Tuesday 01 February 2011 14:15:15 Bjoern Ricks wrote: > Hi, > > currently I am thinking about dropping the need of the extras-devel > repository for Kontact Touch on Maemo5. Therefore I have to switch the > packages qt packages and use the official ones (from maemo pr1.3) instead > of the libqt

Re: Akonadi database performance

Hi, On Tuesday 22 February 2011 15:06:59 Bjoern Ricks wrote: > on the kde-mobile-user maillinglist we got feedback about unpleasant > performance of akonadi on Maemo5 (N900) with large account (>=1GB). bad performance during syncing or accessing data? > We at > Intevation thought about how to im

Re: Source

On Saturday 09 April 2011 18:32:53 Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Saturday 9 April 2011 18:12:00 Sascha Manns wrote: > > i want to try to package Kontact Touch for KDE:Active. > > [...] > > Maybe you guys knowing more? > > It's in the kdepim repo like the regular kontact. The current openSUSE > kdepim p

Re: Source

On Sunday 10 April 2011 19:00:36 Sascha Manns wrote: > Hello Mates, > > Volker Krause wrote at Sunday 10 April 2011: > > On Saturday 09 April 2011 18:32:53 Kevin Ottens wrote: > > > On Saturday 9 April 2011 18:12:00 Sascha Manns wrote: > > > > i want

Re: [Kde-mobile-users] New packages for N900?

On Friday 27 May 2011 11:40:12 Bernhard Reiter wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 25. Mai 2011 16:29:59 schrieb Rolf Eike Beer: > > It has been rather quiet here. Also the experimental repo doesn't show > > any new packages since a long while. What has happened? The reason that you don't see new packages is th

Re: [solved]: kdelibs packaging broken on MeeGo 1.2

On Wednesday 10 August 2011 15:44:41 Bernhard Reiter wrote: > The riddle is solved: > Someone must explicitely install the package "kdelibs-data", > it contains /usr/share/kde4/services/kfilemodule.desktop > which is a must for the KFileDialog to come up. > This is a packaging defect: A hard depend

Re: Kontact Touch 4.7.0 on MeeGo 1.2 Ideapad, crash

On Friday 19 August 2011 22:02:35 Bernhard Reiter wrote: > I'm getting a crash on my ideapad with MeeGo 1.2 > and Kontact Touch: > Version : 4.7.0 Release : 1.1 > > When trying to open the composer for a new email > from the flap menu. works here, just sent my first mail from the ExoPC wi

Re: again: kdelibs packaging broken on MeeGo 1.2

On Friday 19 August 2011 21:59:14 Bernhard Reiter wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 09:17:18AM +0200, Volker Krause wrote: > > On Wednesday 10 August 2011 15:44:41 Bernhard Reiter wrote: > > > The riddle is solved: > > > Someone must explicitely install the package "

Re: again: kdelibs packaging broken on MeeGo 1.2

On Monday 22 August 2011 10:26:57 Bernhard Reiter wrote: > Am Samstag, 20. August 2011 09:59:59 schrieb Volker Krause: > > > At least with kdelibs* 4.7~git20110817.164121 > > > the situation is worse, because the kdelibs-data packages > > > does not contain kfile

Re: Kontact Touch on exopc (running openSUSE)

On Monday 22 August 2011 14:19:35 Björn Balazs wrote: > Hi all, > > I just wanted to shortly state that I am running Kontact Touch on an exopc > with openSUSE and plasma-active / contour. I do enjoy it, even though it > seems that it is not the latest version running on it - at least I do > remembe

Re: [Kde-mobile-users] Kontact Touch on exopc (running openSUSE)

On Tuesday 23 August 2011 09:32:59 Rolf Eike Beer wrote: > > Anyway, even 4.7.0 is much newer than the latest N900 package we have, > > what differences are you referring to? > > Any chance this will change, i.e. the N900 packages will get regular > builds again? using an N900 myself, I'd love th

Re: Updating Kontact Touch for N900

> komo kdelibs version contains some pachtches for maemo which aren't > backported to master. are you sure? I thought I had merged all Maemo5-related patches at least, the only remaining stuff in there should be WinCE hacks. Volker > On Thursday 25 August 2011 08:51:50 Volker K

Re: Packaging Development KDEPIM Versions for N900 Fremantle

On Friday 26 August 2011 10:11:23 Andre Heinecke wrote: > Hi, > > I'm taking this discussion from kde-mobile-users to kde-mobile as i am now > starting the trunk packager again for the new targets. great, thanks! > Initial Targets will be: > Attica-0.2.0 (unchanged) > automoc 0.9.88 (unchanged)

Re: Packaging Development KDEPIM Versions for N900 Fremantle

On Monday 29 August 2011 09:54:18 Andre Heinecke wrote: > Hi, > > On Saturday 27 August 2011 10:40:48 Volker Krause wrote: > > On Friday 26 August 2011 10:11:23 Andre Heinecke wrote: > > > Initial Targets will be: > > > Attica-0.2.0 (unchanged) > > >

Re: Packaging Development KDEPIM Versions for N900 Fremantle

On Wednesday 31 August 2011 11:15:51 Bjoern Ricks wrote: > On Wednesday 31 August 2011 11:05:56 Andre Heinecke wrote: > > Kdelibs 4.7 is failing as > > early as applying the the patches (which were made for 4.6-komo branch) ( > > http://websvn.kde.org/branches/work/komo/packaging-master/maemo/kdeli

Re: Packaging Development KDEPIM Versions for N900 Fremantle

On Wednesday 31 August 2011 16:31:44 Volker Krause wrote: > On Wednesday 31 August 2011 11:15:51 Bjoern Ricks wrote: > > On Wednesday 31 August 2011 11:05:56 Andre Heinecke wrote: > > > Kdelibs 4.7 is failing as > > > early as applying the the patches (which we

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >