http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12881
shaohua...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|acpi_acpica-c...@kernel-|ming.m@intel.com
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12795
--- Comment #26 from shaohua...@intel.com 2009-03-24 20:22 ---
how about not load i801_smbus driver? Since the _L15 method will use smbus,
which might conflict with smbus driver.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userp
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873
--- Comment #20 from shaohua...@intel.com 2009-03-24 20:05 ---
Will you please try the following boot option?
a. acpi_sci=high
b. acpi_sci=edge
c. acpi_sci=edge acpi_sci=high
can you try the boot option as suggested in comm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12731
--- Comment #29 from shaohua...@intel.com 2009-03-24 19:48 ---
how about load the i915 drm driver?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12795
--- Comment #25 from yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-03-24 19:44 ---
Will you please do the test as required in comment #19 and then see whether the
kacpid can work well?
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userpre
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873
--- Comment #19 from yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-03-24 19:12 ---
Hi, Kenney
From the log in comment #18 it seems that the issue also exists on the
2.6.26 kernel. Can the hotkey work after the ACPI IRQ 9 is disabled?
Will you plea
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
--- Comment #33 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-03-24 18:30 ---
Congrats, Pascal. :)
Now you just need to try kernel 2.6.29.
you can get the source code tarball linux-2.6.29.tar.bz2 at
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11953
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|rui.zh...@intel.com |a...@osdl.org
Status|NEE
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10572
--- Comment #59 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-03-24 18:31 ---
okay, 2.6.29 would be a good candidate.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You a
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11953
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|acpi- |rui.zh...@intel.com
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12795
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
--
Configure bugmail: h
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
--
Configure bugmail: h
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12731
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
--
Configure bugmail: h
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12197
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|venkatesh.pallip...@intel.co|rui.zh...@intel.com
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11268
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
--
Configure bugmail: h
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11255
--- Comment #80 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-03-24 18:25 ---
Denys, it looks like a duplicate of bug #12731, doesn't it?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail be
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12878
--- Comment #21 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-03-24 18:19 ---
yes, please. :)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for th
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11750
h...@hmh.eng.br changed:
What|Removed |Added
KernelVersion|2.6.27 |2.6.12 and all later kernels
--
Conf
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12748
--- Comment #11 from h...@hmh.eng.br 2009-03-24 18:06 ---
There you have the partial fix patches.
We still need a much proper connection between power management and ACPI power
resources... enable power resources when devices are ena
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12748
--- Comment #10 from h...@hmh.eng.br 2009-03-24 18:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=20663)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20663&action=view)
Revert band-aid commit
When power resources are properly attached, the PUB
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12748
--- Comment #9 from h...@hmh.eng.br 2009-03-24 18:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=20662)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20662&action=view)
Attach power resources for already-enabled PCI devices
Careful. After this
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11750
h...@hmh.eng.br changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #20511|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9636
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|acpi_power-proces...@kernel-|rui.zh...@intel.com
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9636
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6058
--- Comment #22 from yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-03-24 17:48 ---
Hi, Aljaz
The test results seems weird. Before the custom DSDT is used, the box can
be resumed from S3(in comment #15). But after using the custom DSDT, the box
can't be
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11750
--- Comment #21 from h...@hmh.eng.br 2009-03-24 17:35 ---
Please test the latest thinkpad-acpi beta version, available at:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=117042&package_id=230205
And tell me if it fixes your bri
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6058
--- Comment #21 from prus...@gmail.com 2009-03-24 14:04 ---
Created an attachment (id=20661)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20661&action=view)
before message with custom dsdt
Now it's even weirder. I compiled now the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5471
len.br...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REJECTED|REOPENED
Resolution|INSUFFICI
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12731
--- Comment #28 from gmai...@gmail.com 2009-03-24 13:08 ---
Thanks for still trying to solve this :)
I tried patch and command line argument from comment #27 with released 2.6.29
kernel and got exactly same result as before - it did no
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12920
--- Comment #9 from a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk 2009-03-24 10:57 ---
(pwc has a similar problem btw)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are t
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9636
a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6790
a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6058
a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
KernelVersion|2.6.15.4|2.6.29rc5
--
Configure bugma
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5471
a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12283
astarikovs...@suse.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #19561|application/octet-stream|text/plain
mime type|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12283
astarikovs...@suse.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #19562|application/octet-stream|text/plain
mime type|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12920
--- Comment #8 from mi...@elte.hu 2009-03-24 02:45 ---
testing latest -tip would be useful:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README
in particular the fix below has a chance of resolving it.
Ingo
>
>F
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12908
--- Comment #2 from jirisl...@gmail.com 2009-03-24 02:30 ---
No :(:
$ dmesg|grep -i acpi.debug
$
I don't know how to reproduce it, my feeling is that it usually happens after
few days of being turned off (in S4).
--
Configure bugmail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12878
--- Comment #20 from eddy.petrisor+lin...@gmail.com 2009-03-24 01:59
---
2.6.29 was just released. Is OK if I try that kernel with your patch?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12924
Summary: On GM965 KMS enabled kernel X does not draw untill mouse
is moved. Probably IRQ problems.
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.29
Platform: All
OS/Versi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12694
--- Comment #10 from yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-03-23 20:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=20655)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20655&action=view)
use the ioport tool to access the 0xE404 I/O port directly
Will you p
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12748
--- Comment #8 from yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-03-23 20:16 ---
> What I did was just a revert for ff24ba74b6d3befbfbafa142582211b5a6095d45 and
> a
> simple patch to always call the power resource setup, even if the device was
> already
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12283
--- Comment #11 from nekore...@gmail.com 2009-03-23 20:05 ---
Same problem here, on Eee PC 1000HA (BIOS Revision 1803).
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail beca
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12908
--- Comment #1 from ming.m@intel.com 2009-03-23 18:59 ---
The debug patch:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/3/20/9
Jiri, any update?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving thi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12910
len.br...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12840
len.br...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|CLOSED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12243
len.br...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REJECTED|CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: htt
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12243
len.br...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12908
len.br...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jirisl...@gmail.com
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12705
len.br...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|drivers_video-...@kernel- |e...@anholt.net
|b
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12634
--- Comment #21 from r...@sisk.pl 2009-03-23 15:20 ---
On Saturday 21 March 2009, Robert Raitz wrote:
>
> Yes, this bug remains for the i830. I'd like go get it fixed, if at all
> possible.
>
>
> --- On Sat, 3/21/09, Rafael J. Wysoc
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12419
--- Comment #15 from r...@sisk.pl 2009-03-23 15:19 ---
On Monday 23 March 2009, Wang Chen wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki said the following on 2009-3-22 0:28:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of re
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12816
--- Comment #21 from m...@iworks.at 2009-03-23 14:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=20651)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20651&action=view)
kernel messages
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userpref
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12816
--- Comment #20 from m...@iworks.at 2009-03-23 14:03 ---
That definitely does "something" _good_.
Seems that all rfkill device interfaces work. Devices get initialized nicely
and are even available after cold booting Linux. Seems that
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8427
a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8801
a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11268
--- Comment #46 from dieg...@teleline.es 2009-03-23 11:16 ---
No help :/
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12419
a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8549
a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
KernelVersion|2.6.20/2.6.21.1 |2.6.29-rc7
--
Configure bugm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12920
--- Comment #7 from a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk 2009-03-23 10:44 ---
I'd take a bet on this being the PAT/mmap breakage again
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail b
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12840
--- Comment #7 from mr...@gmx.at 2009-03-23 09:45 ---
Sorry for the late response. I've tested now the latest stable kernel
2.6.28.8. Did several suspend to ram/resume cycles. Also one suspend to
disk. The kernel crashes seem to be gone
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12920
--- Comment #1 from avill...@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec 2009-03-23 08:59
---
Created an attachment (id=20642)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20642&action=view)
Kernel configuration which succeeds in 2.6.29-rc5 and fail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9258
a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
KernelVersion|2.6.24-rc1 |2.6.29-rc8
--
Configure bugm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12920
--- Comment #4 from avill...@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec 2009-03-23 09:05
---
Created an attachment (id=20645)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20645&action=view)
strace output that shows EAGAIN as error from mmap2
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12920
--- Comment #6 from avill...@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec 2009-03-23 09:08
---
Sorry for double-posting the attachment.
I attempted to bisect this bug over the weekend. This is what I got so far:
git bisect start
# bad: [fec6c6fec3e20637
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12920
--- Comment #5 from avill...@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec 2009-03-23 09:07
---
Created an attachment (id=20646)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20646&action=view)
strace output that shows EAGAIN as error from mmap2
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12920
--- Comment #3 from avill...@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec 2009-03-23 09:01
---
Created an attachment (id=20644)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20644&action=view)
Full xorg log when bug happens.
--
Configure bugmail: h
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12920
avill...@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #20644|application/octet-stream|text/plain
mim
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12920
--- Comment #2 from avill...@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec 2009-03-23 09:01
---
Created an attachment (id=20643)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20643&action=view)
dmesg output for 2.6.29-rc8 which also shows the bug.
I d
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12920
avill...@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec changed:
What|Removed |Added
Regression|0 |1
--
Configure bugm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12920
Summary: savage: mmap2 of /dev/dri/card0 fails with EAGAIN since
2.6.29-rc6
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.29-rc6
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12917
a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12873
--- Comment #18 from kphilli...@gmail.com 2009-03-23 07:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=20640)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20640&action=view)
Dmesg from 2.6.26 kernel
I believe the regression is all related to t
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11255
--- Comment #79 from denisius.s...@gmail.com 2009-03-23 05:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=20639)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20639&action=view)
dmesg - 2.6.29-rc8 + patch
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11255
--- Comment #78 from denisius.s...@gmail.com 2009-03-23 05:51 ---
I tested... unfortunately it doesn't work as usual :9
Also I attached dmesg before sleep
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12795
--- Comment #24 from m...@iworks.at 2009-03-23 04:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=20638)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20638&action=view)
lspci -vvxxx
sudo lspci -vvxxx after hibernating Windows
--
Configure bu
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12795
--- Comment #23 from m...@iworks.at 2009-03-23 04:36 ---
Sorry, here we go.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12748
--- Comment #7 from h...@hmh.eng.br 2009-03-23 03:13 ---
Sure about it? It will leak pointers like crazy until the rest of the code is
fixed...
What I did was just a revert for ff24ba74b6d3befbfbafa142582211b5a6095d45 and a
simple pat
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11255
--- Comment #77 from denisius.s...@gmail.com 2009-03-23 03:09 ---
You wrote there:
> I checked for bios updates on LG site, but latest version they have is
> A1637IL1
> version 1.63
Please say where you found new bios? maybe there
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
--- Comment #32 from pascal.haeuss...@gmx.net 2009-03-23 02:43 ---
Hi all,
sorry for my late reply. I was (and am) very busy since I became a daddy - my
wife and me got our first child Paul. There was no time for any kernel testing
in
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1752
yakui.z...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||soemr...@xs4all.nl
--- Commen
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11857
yakui.z...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10572
--- Comment #58 from r...@bsdfreaks.nl 2009-03-23 02:23 ---
I will to try to test the latest kernel probably next week.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail beca
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10572
--- Comment #57 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-03-23 02:20 ---
ping Rob.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug,
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11255
--- Comment #76 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-03-23 02:18 ---
please do the same test at http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12731#c27
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are re
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11415
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #27 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-03-23 02:12 ---
ping Vefa.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12748
--- Comment #6 from yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-03-23 02:10 ---
Hi, Henrique
Will you please attach the patch set for this issue?
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #31 from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12901
a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|acpi_power-...@kernel- |a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12731
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #20632|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12878
--- Comment #19 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-03-23 01:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=20633)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20633&action=view)
patch: introduce acpi_sleep=s3_sci_enable
--
Configure bugmail: http
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12878
--- Comment #18 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-03-23 01:46 ---
Linux kernel seems to work perfectly during suspend/resume.
this is probably a BIOS/Hardware issue.
please apply the debug patch attached below on top of 2.6.29-rc8 kernel, r
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12788
--- Comment #29 from yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-03-23 01:30 ---
Hi, James
Will you please add the boot option of "idle=nomwait" on the latest kernel
and see whether this issue still exists after resume?
Thanks.
--
Configure bu
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12901
--- Comment #11 from yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-03-23 01:16 ---
Hi, Alan
From the test it seems that the box can't be rebooted unless it is rebooted
via bios(32bit). Even when the 0xCF9 I/O port reset register is used, it still
can't
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12731
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
--
Configure bugmail: h
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12731
--- Comment #26 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-03-23 01:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=20632)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20632&action=view)
patch: don't re-enable ACPI during resume
please try this debug patch
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12795
--- Comment #22 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-03-23 01:04 ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> Please see http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12816#c6
>
no, this is the lspci -vx
please attach the lspci -vvxxx instead.
--
Configur
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12840
--- Comment #6 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2009-03-23 00:56 ---
ping Martin.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bu
1 - 100 of 23672 matches
Mail list logo