https://github.com/chapuni edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101102
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/chapuni edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101102
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
sdesmalen-arm wrote:
> Is this safe enough to reland? Have it lived without a problem in main for a
> bit?
Thanks for checking. The only failures I would have expected are from lit
tests, but the PR was merged on Monday and I've not seen any buildbot failures,
so I believe it is safe.
There
labrinea wrote:
> @labrinea (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in
> the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a
> one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
> release:note label to this PR.
rorth wrote:
I know, that's how I did it for the original PR. However, when it turned out
16e9bb9cd7f50ae2ec7f29a80bc3b95f528bfdbf was necessary too to unbreak the
Solaris/sparcv9 build, I added a separate cherry pick just for that one. I
guess I should just have closed the original PR and
tru wrote:
I am fine with taking a miscompile at this point if @preames agrees and it's
fairly safe.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101124
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
tru wrote:
Is it a regression/bug fix, finishing something unfinished or something
completely new?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101033
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
lukel97 wrote:
It's a miscompile, but it wasn't a regression since it looks like we've had it
since LLVM 16
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101124
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
davemgreen wrote:
Hi - What stage are we in for backports? Is it still OK to get this in if I add
#101144 to it?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101033
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
tru wrote:
@vitalybuka same here ... safe to backport to 19?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101141
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
tru wrote:
@vitalybuka is this safe to backport to 19?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101140
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
tru wrote:
@vitalybuka is this safe to backport to 19?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101137
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
tru wrote:
@vitalybuka is this safe to backport to 19?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101136
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
tru wrote:
@preames should this be backported? Is it a regression fix and what's the
impact of this?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101124
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
tru wrote:
Should this still be merged? I can squash it as I merge it if that's what we
want. I am unsure if this bazel fix is important for the 19 release? What's the
impact of this?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101102
___
tru wrote:
@minglotus-6 can you review this?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101061
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
tru wrote:
Is this still valid to be backported to 19?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101033
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@ldionne (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in
the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a
one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR.
https://github.com/tru closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101345
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
Author: Louis Dionne
Date: 2024-08-01T09:21:02+02:00
New Revision: 0e615206e3b2c5f329cd612c09f3237c6060c06e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0e615206e3b2c5f329cd612c09f3237c6060c06e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/0e615206e3b2c5f329cd612c09f3237c6060c06e.diff
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101345
>From 0e615206e3b2c5f329cd612c09f3237c6060c06e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Louis Dionne
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 10:40:14 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [libc++] Revert "Use GCC type traits builtins for remove_cv
and
tru wrote:
Is this safe enough to reland? Have it lived without a problem in main for a
bit?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101303
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
nikic wrote:
Release note:
> Fixed test failures in llvm/test/DebugInfo/NVPTX on 32-bit and big endian
> architectures.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101145
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@BeMg (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in the
release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a one or
two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR.
nikic wrote:
Release note:
> Fixed compiler-rt rtsan build with glibc 2.40 when `_FORTIFY_SOURCE` is
> enabled.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101150
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/tru closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101320
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
Author: Piyou Chen
Date: 2024-08-01T09:16:47+02:00
New Revision: b14801954e346a3d2f89f4047f0b0bf457bb0194
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b14801954e346a3d2f89f4047f0b0bf457bb0194
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b14801954e346a3d2f89f4047f0b0bf457bb0194.diff
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101320
>From b14801954e346a3d2f89f4047f0b0bf457bb0194 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Piyou Chen
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 00:54:03 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "[compiler-rt][RISCV] Implement
__init_riscv_feature_bits
nikic wrote:
As https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101150 has been merged, this one
shouldn't be needed on the release branch anymore.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100876
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@MaskRay (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in
the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a
one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR.
https://github.com/tru closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101254
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@nikic (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in the
release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a one or
two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR.
Author: Fangrui Song
Date: 2024-08-01T09:14:24+02:00
New Revision: 03ae9f9fc62b0283505d2d363118b04dd5d947a8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/03ae9f9fc62b0283505d2d363118b04dd5d947a8
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/03ae9f9fc62b0283505d2d363118b04dd5d947a8.diff
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101254
>From 03ae9f9fc62b0283505d2d363118b04dd5d947a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fangrui Song
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 14:52:29 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "[MC] Compute fragment offsets eagerly"
This reverts commit
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-compiler-rt-sanitizer
Author: None (llvmbot)
Changes
Backport 155b7a12820ec45095988b6aa6e057afaf2bc892
Requested by: @nikic
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101150.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified)
Author: Nikita Popov
Date: 2024-08-01T09:13:44+02:00
New Revision: 742576dc3b332d0f67e883b445f482a51ea1feec
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/742576dc3b332d0f67e883b445f482a51ea1feec
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/742576dc3b332d0f67e883b445f482a51ea1feec.diff
https://github.com/tru closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101150
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101150
>From 742576dc3b332d0f67e883b445f482a51ea1feec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nikita Popov
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 09:25:03 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [Sanitizers] Avoid overload ambiguity for interceptors
(#100986)
Author: Alexandros Lamprineas
Date: 2024-08-01T09:04:44+02:00
New Revision: 32b786c92f0ae52201888dcfba5c3ac789afbb3a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/32b786c92f0ae52201888dcfba5c3ac789afbb3a
DIFF:
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@labrinea (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in
the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a
one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the
release:note label to this PR.
https://github.com/tru closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101007
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
Author: Alexandros Lamprineas
Date: 2024-08-01T09:02:41+02:00
New Revision: 196fb42d2ef10cc6b3c9732c2612d2cd2973d340
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/196fb42d2ef10cc6b3c9732c2612d2cd2973d340
DIFF:
Author: Alexandros Lamprineas
Date: 2024-08-01T09:02:41+02:00
New Revision: bb412b723139a7a7f20f768857d9d4c656ac6fbb
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bb412b723139a7a7f20f768857d9d4c656ac6fbb
DIFF:
Author: Alexandros Lamprineas
Date: 2024-08-01T09:02:41+02:00
New Revision: 84de15796052e629a2276bcf1d502d1a8163e32b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/84de15796052e629a2276bcf1d502d1a8163e32b
DIFF:
Author: Alexandros Lamprineas
Date: 2024-08-01T09:02:41+02:00
New Revision: 00d97039a6dacd17beebce32b727e8c23900eeae
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/00d97039a6dacd17beebce32b727e8c23900eeae
DIFF:
Author: Alexandros Lamprineas
Date: 2024-08-01T09:02:41+02:00
New Revision: b9203b6067c868d4305400f0964dbac8e15285db
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b9203b6067c868d4305400f0964dbac8e15285db
DIFF:
https://github.com/tru updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101007
>From b9203b6067c868d4305400f0964dbac8e15285db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexandros Lamprineas
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 19:24:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang][FMV][AArch64] Improve streaming mode
https://github.com/bogner edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100699
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -331,6 +336,249 @@ std::pair
ResourceInfo::getAnnotateProps() const {
return {Word0, Word1};
}
+void ResourceInfo::print(raw_ostream ) const {
+ OS << " Symbol: ";
+ Symbol->printAsOperand(OS);
+ OS << "\n";
+
+ OS << " Name: \"" << Name << "\"\n"
+ << "
https://github.com/aaupov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101270
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/aaupov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101270
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/yuxuanchen1997 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99285
>From 30f8875990935c24b7a3e3111a46d05bc9b902ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yuxuan Chen
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 15:01:39 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] add CoroAnnotationElidePass
Summary:
Test Plan:
https://github.com/yuxuanchen1997 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99283
>From dcd98a941d3edb3e5b96d7feeca50f99ea8309d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yuxuan Chen
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 15:01:39 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Implement noalloc in CoroSplit
---
https://github.com/ivanradanov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101446
>From 26d0051179dec85eb6aee2b48db54964bf042a87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ivan Radanov Ivanov
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 14:44:31 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] [flang] Lower omp.workshare to other omp constructs
https://github.com/ivanradanov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101445
>From 4da93bb2a99ac1d59d4924c518503c94ec81c659 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ivan Radanov Ivanov
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 14:12:34 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] [flang] Introduce ws loop nest generation for HLFIR
https://github.com/ivanradanov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101446
>From 9a51b404ab47c5dd0b27c3f957ee6cefd1470c25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ivan Radanov Ivanov
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 14:44:31 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] [flang] Lower omp.workshare to other omp constructs
ivanradanov wrote:
I am debating introducing a new operation workshare_loop_container which exists
only to "contain" a omp.loop_nest between lowering an elemental to lowering the
omp.workshare it is contained in.
so we would have this state:
```
omp.workshare {
omp.workshare_loop_container
https://github.com/ivanradanov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101445
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
ivanradanov wrote:
Should we have a `-use-experimental-workshare` or similar flag to facilitate
some temporary in-tree development as this may require more moving pieces.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101444
___
llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ivanradanov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101444
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ivanradanov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101445
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ivanradanov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101446
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ivanradanov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101446
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ivanradanov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101445
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ivanradanov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101444
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ivanradanov created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101446
4/4
There are two points which need some discussion in this PR:
1. We need to make a value computed in a omp.single accessible in all threads
of the omp.parallel region. This is achieved by allocating
https://github.com/ivanradanov created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101445
3/4
>From c2cbd7779dc118c6bad507b6babeb7200262caff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ivan Radanov Ivanov
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 14:12:34 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] [flang] Introduce ws loop nest generation for
https://github.com/ivanradanov created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101444
2/4
>From 8068d6036fe84f6c0f22f2c877366eef184292e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ivan Radanov Ivanov
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 14:11:47 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] [flang][omp] Emit omp.workshare in frontend
---
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> > > @ilya-biryukov, could we have another try of this PR on your end?
> >
> >
> > Sorry for missing this, we will rerun the testing and get back to you.
>
> In the meantime, could you rebase the patch on top of current ToT?
Are you saying to rebase on your local branch?
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-compiler-rt-sanitizer
Author: None (llvmbot)
Changes
Backport 3a4c7cc
Requested by: @aemerson
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101432.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) compiler-rt/lib/rtsan/rtsan_interceptors.cpp (+12)
https://github.com/llvmbot milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101432
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/llvmbot created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101432
Backport 3a4c7cc
Requested by: @aemerson
>From 7942172be3fd6fa77a73c08a3f5459feaa7572ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Amara Emerson
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 16:51:45 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Forward declare
https://github.com/aaupov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101270
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/aaupov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101270
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+// Test that missing-annotations detects branches that are hot, but not
annotated
+
+// test diagnostics are issued when profiling data mis-matches annotations
+// RUN: llvm-profdata merge %S/Inputs/missing-annotations-branch.proftext -o
%t.profdata
https://github.com/vitalybuka approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101150
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
vitalybuka wrote:
We usually do cherry-picks this way
https://llvm.org/docs/GitHub.html#backporting-fixes-to-the-release-branches
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101236
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/jdoerfert approved this pull request.
Looks simple and good to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101407
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/shiltian edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101407
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/shiltian edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101407
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Shilei Tian (shiltian)
Changes
---
Patch is 228.66 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101407.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/CodeGen/CGOpenMPRuntime.cpp
https://github.com/shiltian ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101407
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -331,6 +336,249 @@ std::pair
ResourceInfo::getAnnotateProps() const {
return {Word0, Word1};
}
+void ResourceInfo::print(raw_ostream ) const {
+ OS << " Symbol: ";
+ Symbol->printAsOperand(OS);
+ OS << "\n";
+
+ OS << " Name: \"" << Name << "\"\n"
+ << "
overmighty wrote:
The only difference I see between your PR and
be8b2d1ea54f964603b89ab9d4dfad26afebb347 is that you moved the `static_cast`s
into new variables instead of having them inside the `FEnv` function calls
directly. It should be functionally identical.
alexfh wrote:
I'm getting this error when trying to bootstrap Clang:
```
In file included from clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReaderDecl.cpp:15:
clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReaderInternals.h:160:19: error: ISO C++20 considers
use of overloaded operator '==' (with operand types
catull wrote:
@overmighty I am not so sure @MosheBerman's fix does it.
You need both values for `large_value` and `small_value` further down, this is
line 164 and 165.
As for the other change, don't you need to preserve the control and status
words ?
bogner wrote:
Turns out I was wrong and this *does not* effectively avoid the naming
collisions. Tried again here: #101393
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100698
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/bogner closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100698
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/bogner updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100699
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/bogner updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100699
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/bogner updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100700
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/bogner updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100700
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/bharadwajy approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101250
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+// Test that missing-annotations detects branches that are hot, but not
annotated
+
+// test diagnostics are issued when profiling data mis-matches annotations
+// RUN: llvm-profdata merge %S/Inputs/missing-annotations-branch.proftext -o
%t.profdata
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+// Test that missing-annotations detects branches that are hot, but not
annotated
+
+// test diagnostics are issued when profiling data mis-matches annotations
+// RUN: llvm-profdata merge %S/Inputs/missing-annotations-branch.proftext -o
%t.profdata
+// RUN:
@@ -331,6 +336,249 @@ std::pair
ResourceInfo::getAnnotateProps() const {
return {Word0, Word1};
}
+void ResourceInfo::print(raw_ostream ) const {
+ OS << " Symbol: ";
+ Symbol->printAsOperand(OS);
+ OS << "\n";
+
+ OS << " Name: \"" << Name << "\"\n"
+ << "
https://github.com/bogner updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100699
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/bogner updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100699
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/topperc approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101320
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
bogner wrote:
> I do not see the invocation of any of the newly created functions in `class
> DXILOpbuilder` specific to DXIL Ops `create##Name##Op(...)` or
> `tryCreate##Name##Op(...)` (for example `createSinSin13()` or
> `tryCreateSin13()` when lowering `llvm.sin.*`). Are these in
101 - 200 of 23732 matches
Mail list logo
